Creepy Condescending Wonka

Because the definition of "assault rifle" is ambiguous. Automatic weapons are already banned. Current attempts to ban "assault rifles" focus on cosmetic features that have nothing to do with functionality. Essentially they want to add costly bureaucracy without actually improving public safety.

Shame on you! People can't be responsible for themselves! That's why we need big government! **SARCASM**

And because this is a meme site and I'm not writing a paper about it, this is over-simplified. :)

Looks to me that you got several good answers. The real question now is "Will you accept the truth?"

Ban Islam in America and you'll get to the real root of the problem.

That I cannot agree with. Not all muslims are terrorists. We DO have a First Amendment, too.

The First Amendment applies "Freedom of Religion", not "Freedom of Death Cults bent on world conquest through political and violent means, masquerading as a religion to recruit and finance their Satan worshiping agenda." Islam is a religion like cancer is a body organ.

That's like saying all white men are racist.

The majority of muslims are non-violent. Most of them sincerely believe that the radical jihadists are evil.

And before you start to question me, as a white male Christian, I believe muslims are following a false prophet, but as an American, I believe they have the right to follow whomever they choose.

No, it's not like saying all white men are racist. It's like saying all KKK members are racist. Because when you belong to a barbarian cult that believes in killing homosexuals, systematic degrading of women, slavery, pedophilia, etc etc and the subjugation of the entire world, that is not a religion. If you had a brain bigger than a housefly, you could connect the dots.

You are now officially not a debater.

You are a hater.

You are nothing.

Thank you for proving my estimation of your intelligence 100% correct. If anything is invalid, it is your pathetic attempt to divert the argument away (when the bodies aren't even cold yet) with a childish, politically correct ploy. Your Progressive professors must be so proud of you, a brainwashed drone. In the meantime, people are dying and more will die, thanks to you and your ilk putting their heads in the sand.

Never went to college. I'm a Libertarian. You are ignorant (not name-calling, a fact based on the evidence of your statements).

And I voted for Trump.

I started a local Libertarian chapter and folded it a year later because of the pinheads that came out of the woodwork who thought eliminating Social Security, taking all regulations off machine guns and legalizing all drugs were viable political positions, not a suicide mission. None of this has anything to do with your ignorance of what atrocities every day so called "moderate" Muslims support fully. Go read some foreign press (Daily Mail for starters) and see what you have been missing or turning a blind eye. You understand nothing of the backwards death cult of Islam, so shut your pie hole already.

imgflip.com/i/1466ct

In my debate league in school, a debate was halted as soon as name-calling occurred, and the name-caller was automatically declared the loser of the debate. This was heavily ingrained in me with regards to debating. I should have stopped trying to reason with you then, because you refuse to be reasonable. By these standards...

You lose.

News flash: You're not in school anymore. It's the real world out here, where people die and pinheads like you can't handle reality. Go crying back to your Progressive professors and chalk off a safe space for yourself.

You still haven't addressed even one of my points or answered even one of my direct questions. Tell me how a (supposed Libertarian, in love with the Constitution) can justify Sharia law in even ONE municipality in the US, which is EXACTLY what your beloved (mythical) Muslim moderates are pushing for every day. Go right ahead. Islam is a Satanic death cult, bent on world conquest thru any means necessary and in no way deserves the protections afforded a real religion.

If you would actually read what I wrote, you would see that I DID answer you. **Pats you on the head** You just keep making your assumptions instead of doing any actual reading.

Read this.

imgflip.com/i/1466ct

And I made this meme a while ago... Tell me again how you know so much about me?

Damn reply limits...

You try awful hard to portray me as something I'm not. You also try to attribute to me words I have never said.

Apparently, based on later statements, you stopped reading the above reply (the one with the broad brush meme) after the first sentence. Here's what you didn't read:
"And before you start to question me, AS A WHITE MALE CHRISTIAN, I BELIEVE MUSLIMS ARE FOLLOWING A FALSE PROPHET[emphasis added], but as an American, I believe they have the right to follow whomever they choose."
If you don't read (or listen to) everything your debate opponent says, you just make yourself look ignorant. First you tried to paint me as a progressive. When I corrected your assumption, you made fun of me and assumed you know my political beliefs.Then you tried portraying me as a "...Libertarian leaning Muslim..." All of this you did after I ALREADY TOLD YOU what I am.

You say I "...understand nothing of the backwards death cult of Islam..." My question to you still stands. How can you claim to know ANYTHING about Islam if you HAVEN'T read the Qu'ran? Or do you just believe everything you read on the internet? Do you even KNOW any muslims?

I never said "...putting Sharia law into the United States, even on a very limited basis is a great idea and in no way endangers anyone's rights under the Constitution..." I don't want anyone dictating how I live my life or what religious beliefs I hold.

I never said I "...agree with [the Qu'ran], the killing of homosexuals..." In point of fact, I SUPPORT gay marriage.

Name-calling is the fallback an ignorant person and a bad debater use when they can't present a reasonable and logical statement to support their position. I present this challenge to you: Do your research, actually read what I have said, and try to respond to it without name-calling. Prove to me that you DO have the ability to use logic and reason. Or not.

You sure get hung up on the name calling. Why don't you try just owning the fact that you are a pinhead and try addressing the very real arguments I put forward, the ones you apparently can't see right in front of your face?

Go ahead and tell me how in your urge to be hip, trendy and cool, that allowing a little bit of a societal and political cancer (like the death cult of Islam) is a good thing. Tell me how allowing these mythical "moderates" to set up their own caliphate in even one US community (in defiance of US Constitutional protections of rights) is okay. Tell me how a little bit of cancer won't still kill you.

You don't understand Islam or it's history. You don't understand the Constitution. But most of all you don't understand the copious volume of what you don't know.

NOTE: I also never said that there weren't atrocities committed in the name of Islam. I DO know what is going on in the world.

And yet you conveniently ignore the atrocities, as though they never happened, because you buy into the Big Lie that Islam is a religion, the same as being Jewish, Protestant or Catholic. It is a political movement, based on conquest, violence and subjugation.

You know nothing of what I know. I have read the Qu'ran. Have you?

You read the Quran. Sure you did. Yes, please tell me how putting Sharia law into the United States, even on a very limited basis is a great idea and in no way endangers anyone's rights under the Constitution, "Mr. Wave the Constitution Around Libertarian". Because ALL Muslims support Sharia Law, financially, in spirit, in reality, in practice. But you go ahead and tell me how Dearborn Michigan is such a hotbed of Libertarian leaning Muslims. You are a real piece of work. "I read the Quran" what a joke. What part did you agree with, the killing of homosexuals? Go f**k yourself, you moron.

I never said I support sharia law. You said that I did.

You made a big deal about the fact that I'm in Michigan. Up until 9 months ago, and for 7 years before that, I lived in Taft, Oklahoma, a historically black town. It was the first town to elect a black woman for mayor. My last boss was her daughter. I worked with a lot of black people who, like Muhammad Ali, were disenfranchised by Christianity and converted to Islam. They were just as scornful of extremists, jihadists, and terrorists as anybody. They HATED ISIS, because when all is said and done, they may publicly and gruesomely kill westerners and Christians, but ISIS kills more Muslims than all other religions combined.

As to my knowledge of atrocities, I suggest you read Ted Dekker's "Blink". It graphically portrays the atrocities that Muslim girls face every day in the Middle East. It's about a Muslim princess's escape to the U.S. with the help of an American.

Look, we agree on about 90% of this issue. My ONLY disagreement is in saying that ALL Muslims are bad people.

Just out of curiosity, are you a Christian?