I'm assuming you meant to type rigged... Not "braided". So I'm responding as if you said rigged...
You stated that you think no one will vote for him with your statement of "no one will vote him...we'll rig the election like in 2020".
I responded that there isn't enough fake ballots to rig it that hard against Vance (in the 2028 election).
Then you said "so you admit it wasn't braided/rigged." (rigged that got autocorrected to braided).
Let's break this down:
You actually admitted it was rigged - when you said we'll rig it like in 2020. I affirmed that it was rigged in 2020 - by saying there aren't enough fake ballots. To which , through some unknown impossible logic flow chart... You conclude that I admitted (somehow) that the election wasn't rigged, when I affirmed it was rigged, by making the point that there's not enough fake ballots to allow it to be rigged. Meaning JD Vance is such a sure thing, that there's no possible way to rig it with fake ballots this go around.
There is no logical flow chart in the universe that should land you at that thought point - that I somehow said I think the 2020 election was legit.
It's potentially the most flawed conclusion ever in the history of politics on ImgFlip. Everybody that has walked into the comments and has read our responses - is now dumber for having to read that you came to that conclusion, with the given information.
