Imgflip Logo Icon

The Great Orange Reset & The Extinction Of The Left

1,464 views β€’ 52 upvotes β€’ Made by EndlessEnigma1 3 weeks ago in politics
Make your own GIF
174 Comments
16 ups, 3w
Dave mustaine | I THOUGHT THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE DAVE MUSTAINE
FOR A SECOND ? | image tagged in dave mustaine | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
13 ups, 3w,
5 replies
ai slop, downvote if you're a gay femboy
or in politics words
"stupid liberal!!!! Wahhhhh!!!!"
2 ups, 3w
Well I guess at least it isn't photoshop slop. xD
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
:3
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Canary I thought you were those TUFF kids, not those feminine kids
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
hes gay
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
I'm gay and I can't feel his gayness (we sense other gays kinda like the spider sense) he's obviously straight
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
It's true and I sense you gay as f**k
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Nuh uh
0 ups, 3w,
4 replies
Wait no that's the guy behind yoy
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
who is behind me
0 ups, 3w
Youre moom
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
boi ts not tuff what you say about phonk??? MANGO MANGO MANGO 67 67 THOSE WHO KNOW
FATHERLESS TRASH GET GOOD LMFAO EZZZZZZZ
0 ups, 3w
Those who Canadian masturbates in still water:
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
BOIII SO TUFF
0 ups, 3w
I feel so MANGO XD πŸ—ΏπŸ·πŸ—ΏπŸ·πŸ—ΏπŸ·πŸ—ΏπŸ·πŸ—ΏπŸ·πŸ—ΏπŸ·πŸ₯­πŸ₯­πŸ₯­πŸ’€πŸ₯­πŸ₯­πŸ’€πŸ₯­πŸ’€πŸ’€πŸ₯­πŸ₯­πŸ₯­πŸ₯­πŸ₯­πŸ₯­πŸ€€πŸ†πŸ’¦πŸ₯­πŸ₯­πŸ₯­πŸ’€πŸ₯­πŸ₯­
0 ups, 3w
SO SIGMA
0 ups, 3w,
2 replies
I may not be a femboy but I’m considering πŸ‘€
0 ups, 3w
aw hell nah
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
You're a woman
How can you be a femboy
0 ups, 3w,
2 replies
I meant considering being bikesensual
0 ups, 3w
How can you consider becoming a sexuality
That's something you realize not decide on
0 ups, 3w
Also women can't become femboys, femboys are feminine men, the closest they can be is tomboys, masculine women
3 ups, 3w,
1 reply
ez noooob get rekt fatherless politics users 🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣 boiii ts so tuff
politics on a meme website πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ get good trash
1 up, 3w
anyway this is a joke
1 up, 3w
5 ups, 3w
3 ups, 3w
1 up, 3w
botslop
1 up, 3w
4 ups, 3w
clankerslop
4 ups, 3w
clanker generated slop
4 ups, 3w,
1 reply
slop created by the race we refer to by the derogatory term "clanker"
press the down arrow on this comment if you're a cute little femboy who will bend over n let me f**k em
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
downvoted :333
now do it
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
oh i'm hardening
0 ups, 3w,
3 replies
F**K ME DADDY
0 ups, 3w
ough, bend over~
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Canary what the f**k
0 ups, 3w
i gotta do ts for the skit
0 ups, 3w
yep. I think that's the last straw. I'm killing myself.
3 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Not one person related to Donald Trump has served in the military. This is going back to at least the 18th century.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Can ya' almost hear the collective eye roll?
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Yes, about Little Hands Fondleroy being a sword-wielding warrior.
1 up, 3w
10 ups, 3w,
2 replies
okay maybe its because I'm an artist but clanker "art" like this genuinely makes me cringe
11 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Also not a personal attack - it's an opinion on AI art.
12 ups, 3w,
3 replies
Calling someone clanker is hate speech to those less artistically inclined who rely on AI to get their ideas into media format. I stated what I stated because you're not insulting the user here - you're insulting the AI artwork itself. Where as HuskySoldier used Hate Speech against the poster - by calling the poster clanker.
2 ups, 3w,
2 replies
how about you just get better at art
4 ups, 3w
I'm awesome at art. Facts
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Some of my art
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Ok
2 ups, 3w
Not bad for a standard #2 pencil - mechanical. Then a basic set of colored pencils & a fine tip Sharpie for the inks.
4 ups, 3w
I can draw lmao. And went to art school
4 ups, 3w
It also wasn't my meme. You should read the thread.
11 ups, 3w,
5 replies
For example - if a White Person calls a Black Person the N Word because they don't like Black People... That's hate speech.

If someone calls a person Clanker because they aren't as artistically inclined - that is Hate Speech to the person less artistically inclined.

There are people with good ideas - but no creative talent. It's Hate Speech to doxx those individuals just because they aren't artistically inclined to produce their own content.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
clanker means robot
not someone who uses a robot..
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
I've actually proven it can be either, depending on whether or not you specify towards the art itself. Total dunk on the topic. It's Hate Speech when directed at a person for using AI art, but it's acceptable to call the art Clanker. It's all in direction
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
the [[[[[[IMAGE]]]]]] (NOT ART) isn't the clanker. the robot is.
0 ups, 3w
So you're saying it's hate speech against a program that took years to develop and was written creatively for people's enjoyment... That's just hating an artists medium. In this case - programming as an art medium.

If you want to be hateful that's on you. Calling AI Art Clanker Slop is acceptable. That's calling out the art itself. Just using Clanker though - that's either hate speech towards the user that used the AI art - or it's hate speech against an artists using a medium you don't approve of.

Get some love in your heart before too many years are wasted man...
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
nope people who were enslaved beaten and discriminated against arent comparable to losers who use ai
4 ups, 3w,
1 reply
those people now being beaten enslaves and discriminated against. Once again - the party of inclusion is being hateful to a group. I feel bad for you.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
uhmm.. no.. being called losers online aren't comparable to the lashes of a whip
2 ups, 3w
If that's the case.. then how is it that MAGA is a bunch of dangerous individuals that represent the greatest threat to the United States?

All I see from MAGA are words - yet the News & members of Congress continue to call MAGA the greatest threat to our Democracy.

Either words are violence - or MAGA isn't dangerous. Which one is it?
3 ups, 3w,
1 reply
we're calling the AI a clanker. I call most robots that. except for p.AI.nter from pressure, he's silly :D
6 ups, 3w
Yeah you specifically spell out AI slop... I mention that in my examples. Others aren't specifying it is about the Art... Which is then an insult to the poster of the meme, meaning "someone who uses AI Art". It diminishes the content of the poster who doesn't have the capacity to bring that idea to a medium.

It's like calling a graffiti artist a Vandal because he's using Vandalism as a medium for art.

Those particular posts are an insult to the poster for using AI imagery. Not a doxx on AI Imagery.
11 ups, 3w,
1 reply
In that universe sure. Using against those that use AI images is a slur to those users now
11 ups, 3w,
2 replies
Nope. Because it was used as Hate Speech against a poster & not directed to the Art itself.
11 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Also - not in every universe. Pretty sure it wasn't a slur in Star Trek or Marvel Cinematic or DC Cinematic or in the Back to the Future Universe. It's not in the Dragon Ball Z universe... It only exists in our universe Star Wars & probably the Transformers universe although there aren't specific examples
6 ups, 3w
Alioth0 ups, <1h
which is obviously irrelevant since nobody used it in those shows

You just said in every universe, so pointing out other universes it doesn't exist, breaks your statement. If that statement doesn't hold water against your own argument... Maybe, just maybe - I'm right here.
11 ups, 3w,
2 replies
In this comment yes. It specifically calls out the art... Not the poster who asked it to be made. In some other posts - that isn't spelled out and ergo is an insult to someone who isn't artistically inclined - not a doxx against the art itself.
2 ups, 3w,
3 replies
no one uses clanker to refer to the person who posted the AI slop, that's not the meaning of the word at all
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
If that's the case then why did some people demand that folks just do the art themselves? If they weren't using Clanker to mean someone that uses AI Art...why was there comments referring to someone doing the art themself?

So again, it's bullying hate speech against a user who uses AI Art to portray an idea.
0 ups, 3w
people demand others to do the art themselves because using AI to make ''art'' is seen as lazy
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
You just called them lazy... Again. It's bullying ... I get it. Folks like to full bully people
0 ups, 3w
i didn't say that
1 up, 3w,
2 replies
also, funny how my reply got low rated
1 up, 3w
Most users paying attention to thread don't find it funny - they find it predictable
1 up, 3w
they do it when they get angry I think
if they lowrate anymore replies, they're a gay femboy boykisser furry who likes getting headpats
1 up, 3w,
2 replies
if you lowrate this then you’re a child molester
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
What is lowrate. Is that like a voting website for online content ?
1 up, 3w
it's when you downvote a comment so much that it gets hidden
1 up, 3w
OMG duh.
5 ups, 3w
Note what I said... Not a personal attack... I'm spelling out that you're not doing a personal attack. As a comparison to others that I called out for doing a personal attack. We are on the same side of this argument for your comment
5 ups, 3w
My first comment on your ?? Was explaining my position in other posts... Not a comment on your post.
10 ups, 3w
Then also TheNuciestNoo used Hate Speech
5 ups, 3w,
2 replies
How do you not get it ... When you aim the statement Clanker at the AI art - it's an insult to AI Art. When you only respond and direct the statement about a meme creator...you're insulting the user for using AI Art.

You didn't use hate speech bc you pointed it at AI Art. Others did use hate speech because they aimed the statement at the creator, because they didn't specify they were criticizing the art itself.

I've never seen someone so abject to being called the good guy in a situation before. I literally use YOUR comment to point out how using that slur is proper & you're continuing to argue with me about it.
2 ups, 3w,
2 replies
"art" YEAHHHHHH ok bro
0 ups, 3w,
2 replies
I'm someone that does art. I recognize the novelty of AI art. Like I wanted to see what would it look like if Ghost Rider took over Optimus Prime. It gave me a decently cool image - that is slightly funny because of the various odd mistakes. That's cool technology.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
"""""art"""""

it is not art. there is no artist involved. its a generated image. there's no heart, soul, or effort that went into it. no creativity. nothing
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
You don't think the programming of the algorithms used to make that process happen aren't "art"? Because they are highly creative, highly technical and require skill, takes years to master the skill & give value to people that witness and or use the programming.

By all technical definitions of art - the programming of AI art is Art.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
i never said it doesnt take skill for the original people who made the program. but theyre not making art, a machine is generating an image. if YOU generate an image, you didnt do anything. you put no effort into it. if a human did not create it, its not art
0 ups, 3w
Based upon an artists programming...
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
ai "art"
AIGHT DAWG...
0 ups, 3w
Just because you're not sophisticated enough to appreciate the art - doesn't make it not art.
0 ups, 3w
It made that in like 30 seconds. That's cool.
1 up, 3w
boo hoo
Show More Comments
Make your own GIF
Created from video with the Imgflip Animated GIF Maker