While the deletions in Conservatives seemed a tad biased and maybe overly sensitive, they did make sense in terms of the stream's rules. Surely more fair and logical than what I've witnessed from some of the other streams.
I got a timer yesterday from Poli for posting a screenshot of someone's profile who was mocking someone with ye olde "the left can't meme." He's made 15 memes in 3 months, and that's including meme comments. I got a timer for posting actual fact, his insult aimed at the OP and a large swath of memers is still there.
This was the regular Politics stream, mind you. His bogus insult stays, his hypocritical truth is gone. At least Conservatives is, by intent, design, and mission statement, biased in favor of its namesake. Regular Poli is supposedly not supposed to be so weighted. So given its stated conditions, I'd say Conservatives is far more fair. I may not like the deletions, but they make sense.
- Except for the perma-ban one, I should have checked to see if they had added a new mod then, because not only were the 2 deletions a bit surprising, they BOTH came with the whole stream rules thing about posting printed in my notifs plus some add'l rant or whatev (I didn't read the whole thing, so...) That was the only time I got that from that stream. They did give me 48 the other day but minus the overboard wrapping.
"either our beliefs can stand up to the challenge or they can be disproven and we can change our minds"
Views rarely, if ever, change during discussions or anything, for that matter. It's a basic psychological fact that arguments convince no one but...... the believers (confirmation bias). Otherwise they don't persuade dissenters.
As long as they're framed as "either" and "our" and "beliefs" no one will change their minds, nor will they strengthen anyone else's, as points are reduced to mere high fiving with extra padding simply for aesthetic purposes.
Beliefs tend to be built on flimsy latticework anyways. That's why people get so aggravated about them. They know how fragile they are and how much of their ego's well being they have invested in them.
It might prove preferable to bypass them (as they basically function as mere middlemen) and sticking to simple facts - facts, by nature, being the real root of truths.