"The only freedoms trump is for is freedom that he agrees with. Speech /choice / protest etc...."
That has got to be one of the most ill-informed things you've ever written here yolo. Unbelievable...
"he "love letters" with trump went nowhere."
Yeah, it turned out that way, but if Trump had remained in office, who knows? After all, every other president who took the traditional approach to dealing with them ahs been so successful, that there was no point in trying, right? (that's sarcasm yolo... I feel I must point that out.)
"Ok so to be clear.... you would be in favor of the US directly attacking Russia?"
I certainly won't answer that for LucotIC, but I will say that you have got to have some sort of comprehension malfunction if that is your take on what was posted. Trump intimidated these guys for the simple fact that he might do something to them that they absolutely would not like, and yes, that includes them having the fear that we would attack them directly. Although based on how he used force, I'd say the odds of Trump getting us into a shooting war are quite small compared to what HRC likely would have done, and certain way smaller than what bumblin', stumblin' Dementia Joe and his multiple gaffes have done when it comes to foreign policy.