3. The CSP Constitution
You’ve characterized the passage of the CSP Constitution as somehow devious when in reality it was anything but. Debates were held. Provisions were posted for all to see, several times I believe. OP considered multiple perspectives when putting it together, including none other than the old RUP constitution, and got the buy-in of most parties and a supermajority of a properly, proportionally-allocated Congress. The provision on irrevocability was even separately voted on, as I recall.
Yes, by its own terms, this Constitution is irrevocable. Which in real life, all Constitutions purport to be.
That said — if you really, really, *really* wanted to replace the CSP Constitution, *and* you got Scar to agree to nullify its durability clause, *and* you got a supermajority of the current Congress to pass a new Constitution, then you could still undo it.
Problem is you know you can’t do that — since Conservative Party relations with other parties are abysmal. You may have “won” the election, but Conservative Party is still a minority in Congress. You simply don’t have the votes to muscle through proposals the way you used to be able to under the old system where the elected President, VP, and HOC all got to handpick their favorite Congresspeople, with just a couple of seats set aside for the runners-up, which was always a strange system that didn’t exactly respect the voters’ true wishes, not to mention the concept of separation of powers. Imagine President Biden picking progressive Democratic congresspeople to represent rural Mississippi, or President Trump picking Republican congresspeople for San Francisco — that’s what the old system was like.
Well, impeaching the drafter of the CSP constitution out of spite is not a viable substitute for actually drafting, and actually creating the political consensus to pass, your own Constitution.
Passing the constitution wasn’t in any way devious let alone “treasonous” as you at one point hyperbolically described it. It was passed properly and as a matter of substance actually contains a lot of *drumroll please*… Common Sense. Yep! You guessed it!
So look at it again with unbiased eyes. Scale your ambitions back, consider amending the Constitution in some way if you really have a problem with it. I don’t think I ever heard you spell out what exactly you found objectionable about it. TBH, your idea to replace the Constitution was simply a power-grab, and it was received as such.