I don’t have access to the mod logs here, but I don’t doubt what you say is true. And an astute observation. If it is, it’s evidence of mod abuse that should be pointed out, put into a meme and potentially brought before Congress if you wanted to.
However!
I believe unilaterally unmodding IG and deleting several of his comments was acting with a heavy hand in the context of this roleplay and bound to provoke the reaction we saw.
This is a tricky stream to mod, no doubt. But unless serious abuses (like site TOS abuses) are occurring, I believe the owner ought to leave the interpretation and enforcement of laws to the elected government.
I certainly disagree with the LGBTQ NSFW law. That’s not how we mod the LGBTQ stream — marking all the memes in the stream NSFW would be burdensome and silly and wrong for its userbase. I disagree with the idea that sexuality topics (without sexual content or curse words) are inherently NSFW. If I were in Congress, I would have voted against the law.
But I’m not in Congress. And the decision to mark sexuality-related content NSFW doesn’t strike me as a big enough deal to cause a rift. Don’t like it? Run for government and change the law!
Absent your intervention, perhaps no one here would have ever been astute enough to discover that IG was marking his own memes SFW when they arguably should have NSFW. If there are no enterprising “lawyers” monitoring the stream for such things. Or perhaps they are and they would have found it. After all, whether a meme is marked SFW is publicly available information (although who did the marking isn’t - you have to see the mod logs to know).
And perhaps that would have been okay, either way.