25 pages reviewed and I find only this lone image that IS NOT either 1)mildly repulsive 2)averagely repulsive 3)extremely repulsive in it's representation of women. (This from someone who uses all kinds of raunchy porn.) I'm not going to ask why you post the way you do. On the whole you seem descent. At least you are consistently bi-polar. I enjoy the gifs of yours in various streams and again the Dunst image I hope you found enjoyable too. It would be stupid of me to block your account because I might forget and then comment. Yet we certainly are not friends the way we were. WHY would suggest that my posting of a tasteful modeling shot of a popular actress was part of a discussion about denigration. Or when I backed off from the wrath I sensed and equivocated with 'unpleasant.' If not cruel it was dumb. 9rppg3.jpg (click to show) Bye.

I'm not hearing: 'I'm sorry for a cruelly sarcastic comment.' It was hurtful on so many levels to see you use the Dunst image the way you did!

We were such friend online. What have I done. AND what have you done in reply? That was the meanest thing anyone has posted to me in my life. Apologize or you will be blocked.

I really did collect or capture and house reptiles for most of my youth. The other thought is now how the opposite happens. I am disconnected from wild reptiles and think of them as media representations of ideas. A reptile, metaphorically or as they say these days, a trope, is often a cold hearted lackey such as found in 'Jupiter Ascending'.

It's late. Can I list all the memes with unpleasantly presented women tomorrow?