Imgflip Logo Icon

Picard Wtf

Picard Wtf Meme | WHY THE HELL DO KILLERS GET AN APPEAL PROCESS. . . AND UNBORN BABIES GET NONE | image tagged in memes,picard wtf | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
3,601 views 81 upvotes Made by Invicta103 9 years ago in fun
Picard Wtf memeCaption this Meme
63 Comments
[deleted]
7 ups, 9y,
1 reply
One Does Not Simply Meme | BECAUSE THERE'S A CHANCE THAT KILLERS WERE FALSELY CONVICTED. UNBORN CHILDREN ARE GUILTY BEFORE PROVEN INNOCENT. | image tagged in memes,one does not simply | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1 up, 9y
Perfect reply meme brother!! Drives it home!
4 ups, 9y,
1 reply
Matrix Morpheus Meme | BECAUSE CONVICTED KILLERS WILL LIKELY VOTE DEMOCRAT IF THEY WIN THEIR APPEAL | image tagged in memes,matrix morpheus | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1 up, 9y
Of course! I wish convicted felons forfeited all rights,.. voting, SS,.. no fly list,.. firearms,.. for the small % that reform,.. screw it.
1 up, 9y,
2 replies
That's a very good point. And why do they not have to have father's signature ... or fingerprint?
"Abortion should be legal because before women would have to go to "butchers" to murder their babies. And sometimes those women died."
I have always found that argument mind boggling. If you can get it out with a coat hanger ... that is your choice. And also, I need better locks on my house and car.
3 ups, 9y,
2 replies
Obama - Mar 29, 2008 - "Look, I got two daughters — 9 years old and 6 years old," he said. ... but if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby.
2 ups, 9y,
1 reply
He is the most unbelievable president in the history. And yet, people DO believe he is president. They keep letting him in the oval office and everything.
4 ups, 9y,
2 replies
I guess he thought his unmarried mother was punished with him? And his kids are part of that punishment? Liberal logic! That's our punishment! ;)
2 ups, 9y,
1 reply
(Debbie Downer moment ahead)
I think America is being judged. He is part of that judgment. But as long as there is breath there is hope.
1 up, 9y
I see hope in the users here...! Memes can be funny.. But they also send messages. I see a lot of conservative users here uniting.. if only we could do that in the non meme world. ;)
[deleted]
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
If he's a punishment to his mother and he's here as a burden, then he needs to step in front of a sniper.
1 up, 9y
2 ups, 9y,
1 reply
What about the individual within your organ? They have rights too and are separate from you. Why not give the baby up for adoption instead of killing it too? Did your small minded arrogance ever consider that? :{
0 ups, 9y,
1 reply
Legally, they do not have rights. We have orphans as it is; how are you going to find homes/parents for an additional one million children a year? Have you considered that?
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
The military could always take them. The military's budget in America alone could remove a fraction of itself to fund a national training facility to house and raise orphans until they are adopted or reach maturity. And there's plenty of women in the military to have both a male and female present. As for the people who would be responsible for the children, that could be a great job for testing the adults as well. Something all military members should be able to interact with children and know what it means to protect them.

See? Problem solved. But that's only one way.

We have so many prisons in the country that we could turn some of them into national orphanages and have teachers train there before going to work at schools.

See how I'm not just taking the immoral route and killing a child? I'd rather not have parents than to never live. And I'm pretty sure the child being aborted would say the same thing.

Have you ever even considered any other alternatives besides abortion? Have you ever thought of how to deal with the increased orphan population instead of answering it with abortion?

I bet you only ever though "I'll just abort it" is the answer. There are numerous answers for how to deal with the extra lives. .

And people should be more responsible with sex is a better answer than murdering millions a year. You'd make a great doctor with how you don't actually try to fix the problems.

You can throw that bullshit argument of where will the orphaned children live as if it's actually a valid point all you want kid. It's still better than killing them. Any other argument to justify abortion is just as spurious. :{
0 ups, 9y,
1 reply
So, you admit to rejecting any argument for reproductive freedom before even hearing it? You have no idea what a hungry, abused orphan would prefer. Besides, aborted fetuses don't know they're aborted any more than eggs know they're not fertilized. Your "solutions" are completely impractical on the scale that would be needed. We all know "pro-lifers" will never consent to one dime being spent on a fetus after it's born.
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
[image deleted]It's not a right that women have in the first place. No human has the right to kill another person without being attacked by that person.

You're clearly the one who is ignoring reason.

YOU have no idea what a person would prefer.

So if you were asleep I could kill you? You would be asleep and wouldn't know you were being killed just like the fetus. Right? That's your own logic. You ignorant berk.

Homeless/starving people should be euthanized too just because their life is difficult. Right?

You should try giving solutions that don't involve murder for once.

See that's where you expose your real intent. You seem to think that pro-lifers are as immorally unsound as you and your camp. The people against abortion would be the first to say that we could divert the funds from DOD spending to help raise the orphans.

You're just another punk who wants to claim it as a right, when really you're just a lazy twat. :{
0 ups, 9y,
1 reply
Fetuses do not have the same rights as born people, this is a legal fact. Abortion is not murder, also a legal fact. And you are wrong about your fellow "pro-lifers." They consistently oppose funding to feed, house and provide medical care to children. And the military is the last thing they'd consent to cutting.
1 up, 9y
No, abortion is murder, but in 1973 it was legalized, unconstitutionally and further enforced by oath breakers and immoral people like you.

So no, it's not a legal fact like you claim.

"They consistently oppose funding to feed, house and provide medical care to children. And the military is the last thing they'd consent to cutting." This is your already biased opinion of pro-lifers speaking though, and not a factual statement.

You are talking out of your ass and you're trying to justify killing an innocent individual with false claims. :{
1 up, 9y
Why are you trolling my memes?
1 up, 9y,
3 replies
How pro-life of you. Thousands of mothers, daughters, sisters and wives dead annually so you can feel morally righteous. Tough shit I guess?
4 ups, 9y,
2 replies
1 up, 9y
This,.. or a variation is worth posting,.. ! I really like this!
2 ups, 9y,
1 reply
1 up, 9y
I did. Thank you for the correction.
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
ROFL! You think that matters next to billions having babies just fine?

See how easy it is for you to justify murder when bearing a child merely inconveniences you and poses a less that 0.0001% chance you'll die?

Just give the baby up for adoption. Stop condoning murder. :{
0 ups, 9y,
1 reply
Who is going to raise the additional one million children annually?
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
[image deleted]I answered this for you above somewhere but:

So that justifies killing an innocent person? Not having parents? Again, the military, forming a new job class of Orphan rearing individuals who are contracted by the military, education, or prison industry would be one of many non lethal solutions.

Are you this ignorant about all your beliefs?

You probably just think it inconveniences a person to have to bear the child instead of getting to take the immoral route of killing it. :{
0 ups, 9y,
1 reply
It is only your opinion that abortion is immoral. I disagree. Forcing women to carry pregnancies against their will is immoral. Forcing women to give birth to children with severe physical deformities is immoral. Forcing children to be born without the resources needed to care for them is immoral. My definition of immoral is as valid as yours.
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
No it's a fact. Murder is evil/wrong/unlawful. So, no matter how you try and spin it, abortion is immoral.

Killing an unborn human is forcing death on them against their will. Your argument is invalid before you even utter it.

Murdering a human because you don't have enough resources is still immoral.

And you seem to think the definition of immoral is subjective when it's definitive.

Immoral = not conforming to accepted standards of morality. It is immoral to kill an innocent person in all countries. It is unanimously immoral to kill an innocent so your argument is again invalid before you even make it.

You have chosen to be immoral by condoning/supporting the practice of abortion.

You cannot justify your stance.

Stop pretending to be morally sound when you're condoning killing innocent people. And that you do so for fear of lack of resources and unfounded claims of rights violations makes you look that much more inept morally. :{
0 ups, 9y,
1 reply
Abortion constituting murder is your opinion, one not shared by most Americans, nor endorsed by the US legal system. So, by your definition, abortion is not immoral.
1 up, 9y
[image deleted]Abortion is by definition murder. It's not a matter of opinion OR morals.

Murder = premeditated killing of one human by another.
Human = anything of, or pertaining to humans.

Thus killing a human embryo is murder.

And I've already explained how it's only "legal" so long as it is unconstitutionally enforced by oath breakers and immoral people like you.

And again, it's not a matter of opinion that abortion is murder OR immoral.

You're trying to justify murdering an innocent individual. You have no moral high ground from any perspective. :{
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
Mothers, daughters and sisters having abortions because killing a baby is easier than birthing and giving up for adoption. Got it.
0 ups, 9y,
1 reply
Babies aren't aborted. Who is going to raise the additional one million children annually?
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
You've obviously never saw those PP videos that got leaked. And you are obviously uninformed in general if you think that terminating a pregnancy isn't the same as killing a person. :{
0 ups, 9y,
1 reply
The ones with photos and videos from various places, some having no relation to PP at all? I watched like the first 6, saw nothing illegal, got bored and quit.
1 up, 9y
[image deleted]lol You're still trying to justify that murder aren't you kid?

The videos I'm speaking of were in PP facilities. They showed what PP does with people they murdered. Nice try kid. ut you're obviously uninformed. And immoral if you're going to keep trying to justify murdering innocent people. :{
1 up, 9y
imgflip.com/i/vkrs7 You gave me the idea for this one
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
That says volumes of society Invicta. We'd extend the life of murders and rapists before we would an innocent unborn child.

This is what I mean by you have great points. I would have never thought of that. And this concept in your meme is what a lot of people really need to hear before condoning abortion.

I bet God is proud of you for sharing that one. :{
1 up, 9y
Thank you.. notice advocates to kill, butcher, slice and dice a baby, will protest baby seal hunts, or harvesting sea turtle eggs?
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
1 up, 9y,
2 replies
Why dont we let the babies live,.. and let planned parenthood harvest convicted killer's organs..?
1 up, 9y
I've been saying that since I cemented my stance on this about 25 years ago.
0 ups, 9y
How many children have you adopted?
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
Honestly? Because liberals do not see them as full humans that deserve any rights whatsoever.
2 ups, 9y,
1 reply
Its a "blob" of tissue to them,.... but they go crazy on endangered butterflies or seals,.. or convicted felons on death row
1 up, 9y
well yeah, because animals are more than 'blobs of tissue'
3 ups, 9y,
1 reply
If you believe that a fetus is not a human life until it is born, that is the point you need to try and make. It has nothing, NOTHING!! To do with attempting to "regulate internal organs". Those who are anti abortion firmly believe that a fetus is a human life, and thus is deserving of legal protection.
2 ups, 9y,
1 reply
Good comment to the troll!
1 up, 9y,
2 replies
Funny thing is, I'm not even very pro-life. I just get extremely annoyed that pro-choice zealots talk about "regulating women's bodies" when that's not the position at all. If you believe that the fetus is a human life (a philosophical issue that I don't have a firm position on) it makes sense to try and protect it. And I would expect there to be disagreement on that issue. The argument that you are attempting to "regulate women's bodies" feels like a lazy deflection to me, because they are not prepared to defend the position that a fetus is not a human life.
1 up, 9y
This a typical strategy to deflect from an issue,... but you made a good comment. And,.. one can at least be respectful of an opinion. ;)
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
I'd upvote this comment 10,000 times if I could. The control the uterus argument is a farce.
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
To be fair, they normally get the anatomy wrong as well. Usually it's "regulating va**nas" not uteruses.
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
Lmao
BTW, it edits va**nas? That's not a bad word. That's the scientific name. Pussy, now that's a bad word.
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
Lol, va**na gets zapped and pussy doesn't. Too funny!
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
I don't think I want my va**na "zapped". Sounds painful.
1 up, 9y
Thanks to the internet, I now know that some people like that, but I sure wouldn't ...if I had one.
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
That's exactly what you're doing when you abort another individual. The clump of cells IS another person. What about the aborted child's internal organs you selfish twat?

You just want to justify murder because of your perceived inconvenience and slight risk of death.

Just STFU about this. You obviously don't have any logic or reasoning within you to even know what individual's rights are but then yell at the top of your lungs for yours. ROFL! ROFL! Indeed! :{
1 up, 9y,
1 reply
My bro! That moron is talking about "organ regulation". WTF? THE TROLL may as well of started talking about regulating how much lighter fluid can be used to start a BBQ grill,.. so far off point.
1 up, 9y
lol Totally. That's how these type of people argue though. They have no info other than a few talking points the TV gave them and expect to win against people who actually do the homework? ROFL! :{
Picard Wtf memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
WHY THE HELL DO KILLERS GET AN APPEAL PROCESS. . . AND UNBORN BABIES GET NONE