Darth Maul deserves another star wars appearance!

... except for the poor republican trooper bastards at the beginning of EpIV, some Jawas and supposedly Beru and Owen Lars. But yeah, the fear of these suckers wears off as soon as guys get to swing a lightsaber :)

They killed some ewoks and Unlce owen and Aunt Beru. Not to mention severl Rebel soldiers. :{

Yea, that's true. But no one cares about any of them, anyway. :)

"Yea, that's true. But no one cares about any of them, anyway. :)" Really dude? Really? :{

What does that even mean? I was just hitting on the joke that stormtroopers never hit anything.
And by saying- "Yea, that's true. But no one cares about any of them, anyway", I was simply implying that none of them were that crucial to the plot line of star wars.

Darth Maul had the best light saber skills true he didn't have the strongest force powers

Ok ok I made a mistake darth maul was the first to kill Liam

Have you seen Michael Collins? ;)

And he was killed on the original TV series Miami Vice in the 80's...Although Crockett shared the kill with a woman.

But that was a tv show though. I commented earlier and said I made a mistake that Darth Maul killed liam first

Common killed Liam in "run all night"

Batman kills him in "Batman Begins" too

:)

Ah yes, ancient proto-democrats... :)

lol!

Let's not forget "Next of Kin" where he is killed by Joey (Adam Baldwin).

Killed his body sure. Became 'one who has returned from the netherworld of the force'

But you got to admit the way they killed off darth maul was stupid he was the only redeeming factor in the phantom menace.

It did leave a lot to be desired :(

According to starwars.wikia.com he survived and went into exile in the Outer Rim. There, he gained a set of spider-like legs, allowing him to walk again.

That assertion on the bottom of the meme sounds cool, but actually that's not true ;) Liam Neeson was killed in at least one movie I watched ("Michael Collins", Neeson played M.Collins who was shot by a republican rifleman in an ambush during the Irish Civil War in 1922). Still a funny meme though. And sorry for the necro ^^

i not sure of darth maul being the coolest one, general grievous was pretty epic as well (but that's me liking robots/cyborgs)

To each his own, In the books he survives. I just wish we could see at least one more light saber duel with darth maul before the star wars franchise decides to call it quits

if Darth Maul was to return would they only have to pay him 1/2 the salary?

well, star wars VIII and IX will be made, so there's still hope for you!

Let's hope so. I need to write a letter to jj abrams and disney!

you watched epic rap battles of history hitler vs. darth vader 1-3?

Yes I sure have

They took lazy route. Those bastards

How is Darth Maul the "coolest" SW villain ever? He's the Sith version of Boba Fett. Film wise, he dies like a bitch just like Fett, but because he looks cool, the EU kept him around longer. lol I like Maul, don't get me wrong, but you're supposed to want him to die. He's meant to look evil and represent the Devil. I'm glad Obi Wan showed him what his insides look like. :)

They did fett wrong too. Villains are cooler than heroes by default. Those are the rules!

This is going to sound harsh, but comes from a well of compassion:

Uh, no. Heroes are always cooler than villains. Villains represent the things in our world that are wrong/f**ked up. To think they are somehow "cooler" than the characters meant to embody all that's good in our world is an obvious mental instability.

Fett is great in the EU. But on screen, he's a bitch. Same with Maul. They just LOOK cool. If you like something/someone solely on its appearance, that's just more of that instability.

Also, Liam Neeson isn't some indestructible actor and has been killed on screen numerous times before and after Maul.

It's great that you like SW and all, but your love of the villain over the hero makes me think you've got problems. :l

Once again I made a mistake with Liam being killed on screen I prematurely made this meme without doing proper research, but what is wrong with favoring the villains over the heros? It's just a movie, especially a star wars movie where points of views are emphasized even more so. From the siths view the jedi are evil and vice versa, I know I'm supposed to like the heroes more because we have been conditioned to like them more. To say I have mental problems is not at all accurate. I said the villains are cooler yes but I never said I didn't like the heroes, I like mace windu and ewan McGregor as obi wan, the heroes always win right? That gets boring and predictable.

"what is wrong with favoring the villains over the heros?" Well for one thing it's "heroes". lol All grammar/spelling Nazi stuff aside, it's like rooting for the antichrist or the devil while reading the Bible. It's OBVIOUSLY wrong.

And the excuse "it's just a movie" is the most naive response a person can give. You do know they call TV shows television PROGRAMMING for a reason?

No where in Star Wars do they ever EVER say that the Sith's point of view is understandable. In ROTS, when Anakin says "from my perspective the Jedi are evil" it's to clearly illustrate how crazy he is. GL also said of the Emperor that evil people always THINK they're doing good when they do great evil.

And no, you're not being conditioned to like the hero, the hero is just an admirable character that is supposed to show you good from evil. The stuff HW is putting out IS conditioning you though. What you don't get though is that SW has been outside of HW up until Disney bought it. That's why TFA will have conditioning in it to make you understand Kylo no matter what he does and it's obviously why they chose to have a black main character. They didn't do it because they feel for the black perspective, they did it for monetary gain and to program us.

And again, no, the heroes don't always win. Mace gets killed, Obi Wan has to sacrifice himself and Anakin gets corrupted by the dark side. Luke is the only hero who necessarily won in the films. Hell, Biggs, Prokins, Red Leader, Dack, etc. Tons of heroes died in SW.

The reason why you have good guys vs bad guys is to help show kids right from wrong. Adults are supposed to already have a grasp on it. So if you choose to identify with villains it says something about your character.

You said it all with this: "I prematurely made this meme without doing proper research". You clearly didn't. It's great that you have opinions and express them, but mental instability is the reason for people associating good qualities in villainous/evil characters. . :l

Ok I see your point. What I meant about the good guys always winning was the good side always wins not that individual heroes' didn't die. I think maybe a more understandable example would be vegetta from dbz, he has a very rough and dark upbringing that I think many people could relate to. He eventually becomes a hero thanks to goku's mercy and forgiveness but that's a different conversation

Vegeta isn't a bad guy forever though and was only likeable once he joined Goku's team. So no, that isn't a good example. While he was a villain, he was completely unlikeable. Once he was forgiven and chose to fight for good(or at least stick around Goku) he became a good guy and was likeable. Same with Piccolo's character in a way too. The bad guy is only cool once he's redeemed himself(or herself).

Th SW equivalent is Darth Vader. But he starts off as good, corrupts, is evil, but then redeems himself. While he's Vader and hunting the Jedi and completely under the Emperor's influence, he's a piece of shit. Once he kills Palpatine and tells Luke he was right, he was redeemed. :l

Vegeta was a likeable character even before he was a z fighter. He had an interesting backstory, he was the prince of all sayiens, his dad was killed by frieza, was manipulated by frieza, watched his home planet be blown up by frieza, watched damn near the entire saiyen race be obliterated by frieza and after all that still had to work for frieza. You can still like the bad guy. Like I said earlier I get your point, heroes' are the ones' you're supposed to root for.

He was an arrogant and murderous bastard. How is that likeable? Now he's just and arrogant bastard who only murders other murderers. He though he was honorable before being on Goku's team, but now that he's on it, he actually is honorable. Still arrogant, but that's just his competition with Goku mainly.

The point isn't that your "supposed" to root for them, it's that you shouldn't root for a villain. If you are, something's clearly wrong. You must be mad at something or carrying angst to relate to pre-Z-fighter Vegeta or Vader before he killed the Emperor.

You can have a "great" villain in a film that's only great because it is a perfect example of a villain, but there's no such thing as a good bad guy. Good and evil aren't relative terms. They're specific.

It's your opinion though. I just feel badly for how it may affect you in the future. :l

Did you read my comment? Because your meme comment would suggest otherwise. And no, if you like the villain something's wrong. Sorry. :l

Spawn is different though. Same with Punisher and Wolverine types. But getting a tat of a fictional icon or symbol is childish. As an older adult you'll be judged accordingly. People will see that you were willing to mutilate your body for pop culture references.

It's your body though kid. I would warn against any tattoo of ANY pop-culture icons because it looks lame and childish in hindsight. You should get something more meaningful or artistic in my opinion. What if a day form now, a year, or even a decade form now, you regret the choice in tats? Yes, they're easier to remove now, but there will always be a mark.

I have a tattoo of a yin yang that I got because of what the symbol means to me. God's balance of the universe. I regret it every now and then. You probably feel or have felt the same way before if you have tattoos.

And again, I would suggest a less satanic character. Spawn is an anti-devil character and is a better choice, but is still a pop culture icon and is geared more towards young men and women than adults. I'm assuming you have the Spawn symbol and not the character? Why not just add some of Spawn's chains? Less is more sometimes.

I definitely wouldn't go with a minor SW character like Maul though. The only SW tats I'd ever consider getting would either be the Rebel's symbol or Fett's Mandoa symbol on his shoulder pads. Other than that, there's literally nothing in SW no matter how much I like it(pre-Disney mind you) that would get etched into my skin. :l

I have the spawn character etched already. I might get a jawa too. When my skin is old and wrinkly will it really matter if I have tattoos or not? I won't look good regardless.

You aren't really reading what I'm saying are you?

I wasn't saying that you shouldn't get a tat because when you're old your skin changes. I was saying that other adults will perceive you as immature possibly. Based on what tats you get of course.

A Jawa is a representation of materialism, theft, and poverty. Why would you want that on your body?

Again, it's your choice. I'm just trying to have your best interests at heart and attempt to sway you out of getting something done that you may regret or may cause you harm later in life. If you have friends and family they should be telling you something similar too. If not, they don't have your best interests at heart. :l