I will only apologise for the Marvel ef-up, because I actually knew, but was too lazy to correct it. Now... Where do I start to completely tear up your rhetoric...?
My definition of cross wind is actually accurate, as I even started that being parallel with it the "wind shear" should pose no problem. Cross winds are only called cross winds on landing or take off. I'm not a commercial pilot, but I've flown the occasional Boeing.
Man I was going to do the 1,2,3 stuff but I guess I already screwed that up.
So, 2) helicopters have problems in mountainous areas due to the thin air. Not cross winds (which by definition don't occur) or shear winds. Physics 101 imho
3) I haven't seen the structural plans of aTie but wind is not their biggest problem, the fact they can't fly at all is. Unless they use a gravity engine, popularly and wrongly called anti-gravity engine, we are discussing the degree of flatness of this planet.
Here we go, 4) what you call aerodynamic, I call the opposite. Let me use this opportunity to show off ;) because there are not many conversations where one can simply mention they constructed an F1 testing wind tunnel. (Marsdorf, Germany) so thanks ;)
Right, 5) You have absolutely dazzled me. Kr(36) is real, and therefore I assume superman, not the Marvel one, is real too. To be honest, I would have lost a bet on that... Krypton ...
6) I'm not shiny, but I'm brilliant.
So basically, you are right on most points, apart from the Tie stuff. But that's ok. You tried. (Just lol'ing.)
I'm sure there's a 7... Oh yes. 7)