Sudden Clarity Clarence

This is exactly why I hate feminism. It's not about equality. It's about sexism. And I really hate sexism. Egalitarian is the way to go.

I didn't really describe either :P

Well yeah, the female gender has only really been behind. When it's equal (which to be honest it pretty much is) then they won't need to advance either gender. If men were behind then feminists would be about the advancement of men.

"If men were behind then feminists would be about the advancement of men."
-Men are only 40% of college graduates, and dropping.
-Boys are legally able to be circumcised as infants; girls aren't.
-Women are safe from conscription; men aren't.
-Men are 3% of alimony recipients in spite of being 25% of non-bread winners in marriages.
-Men are penalized harder for the same crimes than women, even after adjusting for past records/repeat offenses, etc.
-Men don't have full control over their own reproductive rights because they have no say in whether to abort or adopt out a child, and are subsequently forced to pay for a child regardless of whether the pregnancy was intentional.

This list just goes on forever, dude, and feminism doesn't do shyte about it.

When you say men are penalised harder does that just take the average jail time for both genders because that wouldn't work, the best example would probably be that the amount of rapists that are male would definately tip the scale.

The other ones are unfair though but there's probably a list just of big as un equality against women that feminists aren't doing shyte about either.

Dude, did you note read what I said?
"even after adjusting for past records/repeat offenses, etc."
The "etc." includes adjusting for the same crime.

https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx

And the fact you would even mention rape as a tipping point just goes to show how oblivious you are... There are 11x more men behind bars than women, and rape is a gross minority of those crimes.

You could have chosen a much more common crime, like theft, if you really wanted to argue a crime disparity being a "tipping point" because of crime averages, but no, you wanted to use this argument as a center stage to bring up rape, after the grossly uneducated assumption that I was not including adjustment for the same crimes.

Eh rape just came to mind as a crime men do a lot more than women.

Also "etc" could really mean anything.

In this case, "etc" referred to adjustments to crimes, so in context, it specifically refers to that, but I just recalled that I actually already noted that it was also adjusted to the same crime prior to saying etc.

Legally circumcised? That isn't stopping people in other countries from doing it to their daughters.

Why are you concerned about over there? Are you moving there to become a missionary? Are you a regular financial contributor to those campaigns?
No? Then work on raising awareness at home where the voter can actually make a difference. And so you know, those same countries that circumcise girls do the same to boys, and the mortality rate is just as high for boys as girls there, because they're both cut with unclean equipment in bush settings with dirty water and no trained medical professionals. Bleeding out and infection rates are similar for both.

Because I care about people in other countries and not just my own.

Correction: you care about women, specifically and exclusively, wherever they may be. You didn't seem to have jack or shyte to say about the male circumcision mortality rate, or even be aware of it.

Yes because just because I care about women and I don't say something about men I MUST hate them.

Gold.

Egalitarianism

It was basically the same... in 1900s

wow the controversy

Either way, humanism is already the name of a worldview.

I agree with the gist of it, but it deserves a down vote because sudden clarity Clarence is supposed to make statements, not ask questions.