Trying to minimize double mastectomies on 13- to 17-year-old girls as "no big deal" because it’s "only top surgery" is absurd. Slicing off healthy body tissue, severing nerves, and causing permanent loss of lactation on a child is irreversible surgical harm, no matter how you try to package it.
And saying "well, bottom surgery isn't legal for teens in those states"-big deal. Something being legal doesn't make it morally right. I don't give a shit what's legal or not; history is full of horrific things that were completely legal under the law.
Besides, in blue "sanctuary" states, there are zero statutory laws explicitly prohibiting these procedures on minors with parental consent. But legal or not, putting kids on puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and cutting off healthy breasts leaves real young adults living with permanent physical scarring, bone density loss, and infertility before they're even old enough to vote.
Biological sex is an immutable, created reality (Genesis 1:27). Pointing out the actual physical damage being inflicted on confused kids isn't "psychosis"- it's standing up for basic human ethics and protecting children who aren't old enough to give informed consent for lifetime body alterations.