Imgflip Logo Icon

It's only acceptable if a Democrat does it. Right??? Republicans are not allowed to accomplish what Dems fail to do.

It's only acceptable if a Democrat does it.  Right???  Republicans are not allowed to accomplish what Dems fail to do. | Did Democrats know
President Harry Truman (D)
offered Denmark
$100 million to purchase Greenland? Of course not.  They're too obsessed with race to care about history, unless that history has to do with race. | image tagged in dems hate america,dems want to destroy america | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
246 views 20 upvotes Made by AdamSmithsInvisibleHand 3 days ago in politics
23 Comments
4 ups, 3d,
3 replies
Most libs on here couldn’t find Greenland on a map,
2 ups, 3d
🤣🤣🤣 So true.
0 ups, 2d
Ask me about any country in Europe
3 ups, 3d,
2 replies
If we owned or just came to a agreement with Greenland, it would go a very long way to preventing China and Russia from attacking us.

Let me word this in terms that Democrats will understand. Xi Zinping and Vladimir Putin hate LGBT+, African-Americans and people who illegally immigrated to America. There is a very strong possibility that they might use their white and white-adjacent privilege to launch nukes to target LGBT+, African-Americans and Illegal Immigrants. If we could own or, at least, have an agreement with Greenland we could put an end to racism.
2 ups, 2d
If we were able to directly deal with Greenland then things would be a lot easier.

Here's the rub about this. These countries that are bitching today about Trump and Greenland are the same countries that did worse when steamrolling places like any African countries like the Congo. They are also doing the same crap to the Inuits that the US government is still doing to Indian tribes - saying they 'own the land' while keeping them trapped there under the guise of 'protection' or 'preservation of culture'.

It's just a way to keep Tribes and Inuit down without having to do the nastiness of a trail of tears.
1 up, 2d,
1 reply
Who tf is talking about Xi Jinping and white-adjacent privilege in the same sentence
1 up, 1d,
1 reply
Leftists.

It wasn't in the same sentence.

I didn't invent "white privilege" and I don't call Asians "white adjacent". I don't invent strange ideas to label people with. I also am not racist against whites or Asians (or anyone else).

I was trying to use the left's "newspeak" so they would understand it what I the point I am trying to make.
0 ups, 18h,
1 reply
"so they would understand what I the point I am trying to make"
0 ups, 17h,
1 reply
"so they would understand what I the point I am trying to make" What part of that lead you to think that I am the point?

The original point I was trying to make is we need Greenland to protect us from Russia and China. I just reworded my original point into "newspeak" so libs could better understand it. But I guess I was wrong. You got hung up on the minutia. Oh yeah. Of course you would. Libs are always scrutinizing over every word a conservative writes, looking for ways to turn it into a racist statement. Here, let me save you the time and the headache. There was nothing racist in what I said.
0 ups, 17h,
1 reply
What racism?
0 ups, 17h,
1 reply
Did you understand my original point? If so then why all the questions?
0 ups, 8h,
1 reply
Why would Russia and China be using "white adjacent privilege" to launch nukes at areas with minorities
0 ups, 4h
Get over it. It was a parody. The only point I was trying to make was about how Greenland was necessary for our survival.

Libs have a real problem with understanding or even caring about our survival. They have a death wish.

The parody was to use liberal buzzwords so that liberals can understand what I was talking about.

There no such thing as white privilege. No one is using what does not exist.
1 up, 2d,
1 reply
You think offering money to buy it is the same as threatening to take it by force?
2 ups, 2d,
1 reply
I think the left thinks Trump wants to take it by force. But the reality is that Trump is trying to negotiate a deal to either purchase Greenland or an arraignment where our military can use Greenland to block any potential threats from Russia or China.

The left does not want to be protected from anyone. They want the destruction of this nation because of how much they hate it.
1 up, 2d,
1 reply
Well I don't think all of that tariff bs is going to help with diplomacy
1 up, 1d,
1 reply
Do you know why Trump is using tariffs? It is all about diplomacy in this case. But overall it's because the rest of the world has been abusing us in the marketplace. A a result we've almost lost our manufacturing base.

I know this is a difficult concept to grasp but Trump is trying to bring the United States back up to the major exporter that we used to be so that there are more Americans with jobs. The more products made in America the more jobs for Americans.

Right now American manufacturing just cannot complete with Chinese slave labor. So Trump issued tariffs on Chinese imports so that American manufacturing can complete. China has responder by lowering the price of their exports even further but that is not sustainable and China's economy will collapse if they keep that up.

China, basically speaking, hates us. They, just like the left, wants to see us collapse.

Trump wants to restore the US back to want we used to be, economically speaking. That is why liberals are being told that Trump is trying to destroy America. It's not America he is destroying, it's the left's goal of self-destruction, that he is destroying.
0 ups, 18h,
2 replies
The counter-tariffs are going to kill exports from the US. The entire world can go on just fine without the US, and if we can go on just fine without the world, then it would be amazing. But isolating ourselves and pissing off pretty much every single other country in the world while doing so does not sound like a good idea for the future.
0 ups, 17h
Do you know what happens to countries that impose unreasonable counter-tariffs? We just increase our tariffs. In fact that is exactly what Trump said he would do and those nations backed down.

Do you actually think the world would be better off without us? Think about that for a minute. Let that sink in. What happens to you without the United States? What happens to freedom without the United States? Do you think your life will be better or worse without the United States? If better then why are you still living here? Move. Go find that utopia you think is out there.

Do you think so little of our country to think the world could do fine without us? Is the world at the pinnacle of technological advancement to where they can no longer advance? So you think we've learned all we need to learn, we've cured every illness, we have invented every tool to benefit mankind?

95% of all of the major life changing advancements in the world today came from the United States.

Why the United States? Because of freedom. The left has killed a lot of freedoms over the years and has put a severe stranglehold on innovation these days, but we are still the freest country in the world. Before Steve Jobs died, he referred to when he started Apple compared to all of the regulations that the government imposed on business towards the end of his life. He said if he had to build Apple before he died, he couldn't do it. There's just too much red tape in the way now.

Regardless we still have some freedom comes innovation, more than any other nation. The free market rewards innovation. Socialism punishes innovation.

Now all of that innovation is being sent, mostly, to China to be built because Chinese slave labor is less expensive than paying Americans to build it. We still innovate but because it is impossible to turn that innovation into an affordable product, we send it to China do be made. Because of that we have made China technologically our equals at the expense of the United States. Had we not done that China would still be 100 years or more behind us.

"isolating ourselves and pissing off pretty much every single other country in the world while doing so does not sound like a good idea for the future."
0 ups, 17h,
1 reply
Except for the fact that we are NOT isolating ourselves. Why does the left always call it isolationist to actually try to make America better? That's idiotic. We still export goods and services, we'll just have more goods to export.

We haven't shut off any foreign travel. We're not doing anything to isolate ourselves. So why does the left scream isolationist. Trump actually means it when he says let's Make America Great Again. Just like when Reagan said, lets Make America Great. What is wrong with putting people to work? What is wrong with getting raises? What is wrong with making the economy sound? What is wrong with helping ourselves for a change?

We are NOT citizens of the world. We do not want the New World Order. We do not want The Great Reset. We do not want the left's Global One World Fascist Government.
0 ups, 8h,
1 reply
We'll have more goods to export, we just won't be exporting as many
0 ups, 4h
Says who? If we make products that are in demand internationally then we will export them. Since we started producing our own oil again, we are one of the top exporters of oil now.

Stupid Biden ended that. There was absolutely no logical reason for making us dependent one oil from countries who hate us. But that's what Biden did after Trump allowed oil companies to start drilling for domestic oil.

That's always the goal of any business is to make products that are in demand. If there is no demand than it doesn't get made.

That's how businesses have always worked outside of socialism, communism, nazism and fascism. Under those regimes government decides what gets made, even if there is no demand for it.

You're belief that the world hates us because of Trump is very myopic. The leftists around the world hate Trump but who cares about them. They are not the only people outside of this country. There's a lot more people who like Trump than who hates Trump. The only difference is the Trump haters have a microphone and everyone else has no voice at all.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • black guy pointing at head
  • the more you know
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    Did Democrats know President Harry Truman (D) offered Denmark $100 million to purchase Greenland? Of course not. They're too obsessed with race to care about history, unless that history has to do with race.