Imgflip Logo Icon
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
48 views 1 upvote Made by DeadFredTrump 5 days ago in politics
12 Comments
5 ups, 4d,
1 reply
LOL -- altogether now leftists -- "Fer sure, we-ums got Trump this time!"

It's already known that Jack Smith applied for work with the DNC before they assigned him to persecute Trump for strictly leftist political reasons. It's also known that a leftist activist judge worked with Smith to illegally authorize listening in on conservative legislators. So good luck with the latest leftist generated political lawfare efforts to 'get' Trump.
3 ups, 4d,
1 reply
It's weird that in the opinion of the Left's collective, because a person writes in a more or less educated fashion he or she MUST be foreign born and educated. Considering that the left has almost exclusively controlled education in the United States for the past several decades, this is very telling.
0 ups, 4d,
1 reply
I never made any claims about such a person being educated.

Besides, an educated person would never claim as factual "Jack Smith applied for work with the DNC before they assigned him to persecute Trump for strictly leftist political reasons. It's also known that a leftist activist judge worked with Smith to illegally authorize listening in on conservative legislators."
2 ups, 4d,
1 reply
So you are now saying that leftist media outlets are lying? Nice!
0 ups, 4d,
1 reply
You can't back up your own claims with evidence.
1 up, 4d,
1 reply
I did yesterday and you rejected it because it did not reinforce your incorrect political narrative; and so what's the point?
0 ups, 4d
❌ No evidence Jack Smith applied for or worked for the DNC
❌ No evidence of illegal wiretapping of conservative legislators
❌ No court finding of judicial misconduct in Smith’s cases
✅ Smith is a career prosecutor appointed through DOJ procedure
✅ Courts — including Trump-appointed judges — are overseeing the cases

You’re absolutely free to believe the prosecutions are politically motivated — that’s a legitimate opinion. But the specific factual claims you quoted do not hold up under scrutiny.
1 up, 4d
The courts did that

imgflip.com/i/9blr62
4 ups, 4d
2 ups, 4d,
1 reply
0 ups, 4d
Clinton “sold 20% of U.S. uranium to Russia”
False / Misleading — uranium markets are global; no direct transfer like this occurred.

Russian government paid $145 M to Clinton Foundation
False — most money came from Canadian investors; not directly from Russia.

Clinton personally approved the Uranium One transaction
Misleading — she was one of many officials in the review, with no unilateral authority.

The sale was a quid-pro-quo bribe
No evidence supports this.

The meme combines partial truths with unsupported conclusions:
1. It correctly references the public reporting that donations and the deal timeline overlapped.
2. It incorrectly implies Clinton controlled the outcome or approved the deal for pay-to-play reasons — which is not supported by the facts.

This kind of framing is common in politically charged memes: it grabs on to real events but distorts causation and authority. Fact-checkers have consistently rated the broader claims about bribery or quid pro quo mostly false or exaggerated.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator