Extraordinary claims require proportionate evidence. You go around claiming all sorts of things about the Laws of Physics, then want all those laws suspended so you can coddle the delusion between your ears.
An event being unlikely doesn’t make it supernatural. Miracle claims require evidence stronger than the laws they supposedly break, and modern medical literature treats surprising recoveries as unexplained, not "divine". Unless the claim is independently verified, repeatable, and better explained by a supernatural cause than by chance, error, or unknown natural processes, calling it a ‘miracle’ is just labeling ignorance. And you've provided NOTHING.
So unless you can produce a peer-reviewed paper showing a suspension of natural law instead of ‘something surprising happened once,’ you’re not arguing for miracles ... you’re just repackaging statistical ignorance as theology.
You showed nothing but ignorance. Pure stupidity actually. There are no miracles so I officially publicly blaspheme your stupid god. F U C K your dumbass buybull god. If I could do it any worse, I would. Now let's see if I get struck by lightening ... nope. Still here ... ITS A MIRACLE!!!