Imgflip Logo Icon

SOCIAL ENGINEERING COJECTURE: spirit designs mathematicians to regard humbuggery as treasurable

SOCIAL ENGINEERING COJECTURE: spirit designs mathematicians to regard humbuggery as treasurable | AWESOME A LENGTHY TEMPLATE FOR THE TEXT THAT ANOTHER POPULAR MATH STREAM CALLS A 'RAFT OF WORDS'. IN OUR HUMBLE OPINION THEY SEEM TO BE TOO PROUD TO GET IN A JET BOAT WHEN OFFERED A RIDE. ANYWAY. SINCE APPARENTLY WE'VE BEEN RELEGATED TO THE JUST FOR FUN STREAM, WHY NOT HAVE FUN. I DO NOT MEAN EITHER ROASTING MORE CONDUITS FOR MATH. ————————————————— I MEAN INSTEAD -THE CLOCK IS TICKING ON THESE LARGE INSPIRED TEXT BLOCKS AS MY WRISTS TIGHTEN UP- WHY NOT SHARE WHAT'S GOING ON. SURE THERE HAVE BEEN A HUNDRED FEATURES WITH A FEW REJECTS. THERE HAVE BEEN MANY HUNDREDS OF UN-DOCUMENTED PROOFS THIS YEAR. WE KNOW WE ARE IN THE RIGHT AND THE KNOWN POPULAR OVER REACHING IDEAS ON MATHS ARE WRONG. ————————————————— NO JUDGEMENT. I MEAN LOOK AT DYSON. OR ROWLINGS. OR ME. WHAT IS TOUGHER TO SELL. MUSH? THE MOON ITSELF. SO I CANNOT GET UPSET ANYMORE. THOUGH IT IS PROBABLY THE CASE THE FOUNTAIN WILL BECOME UNUSABLE FROM DISUSE. GOD THAT OTHER MOD WAS COMPARING PRODUCTIVE EFFORT TO PUPPIES AND SMILING CHILDREN. WHAT CAN YOU DO. ————————————————— ANYWAY I REALIZED OUR LATEST CATCH EARLIER THIS HOUR. IT WAS REVISITING A PREVIOUS RARELY RE-USED APPROACH. WHO AM I KIDDING. NO ONE IS LISTENING. IT DOES NOT MATTER WHEN I COMPARE A FOUNDATIONAL LOGIC/ALGEBRA TO A INFINITE STRING OF ADVERBIAL MODIFIED PRIMITIVE 'NO-INGS' PUN INNAPLICABLE. ME WAITING FOR COLLEAGUES TO BE AWARE WE ARE NOT INEPT; ALL THE WHILE WE HOLD FAST TO OUR PREFERENCE FOR INEPTITUDE; THIS STREAM IS CREDITED ELSEWHERE, IN THAT OTHER STREAM, WITH ACCEPTING LOGICAL TREATISE. YET CAN FEEDBACK BE GIVEN. CAN CHANGE BE CONCEIVED. WE HOPE. SO IF ZERO IS EXCLUSIVELY ZERO-ISH THEN BEING SO PLAIN SPOKEN WE ARE SURE RO BE ACCUSED OF BLASPHEMY IN 'MATHS'? ————————————————— WELL IT'S NOT BECAUSE ZERO IS AN ACT OF ESTABLISHING THAT IS JUST AS MUCH AT A CONTRAY DISADVANTAGE AS ADJECTIVIALLY CHARATERIZING ZERO ITSELF AS 'IS-EMPTY' OR 'IS-NOT-EMPTY'. WHY THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN ADVERBIAL AND ADJECTIVIAL MODIFICATION? WELL BECAUSE THE LATER DOES PRESUME AXIOMATIC ZERO. THIS THEN DENIES A DECONSTRUCTION OF A PARADOXICAL FOUNDING. ————————————————— THAT IS AN INFINITE TREE OF (IS)(IS-NOT) MODIFIERS TO (NOT__FULL_STOP) ITSELF HAS NO INTRIGUING DIAGONALIZATION. ON THE OTHER HAND AN INFINITE TREE OF (ISLY)(IS-NOTLY) MODIFIES TO (ISING,ISN'TING) IS INTRIGUING. THERE CAN BE AN UNLOGICALLY ENUMERATED ABSOLUTELY REPETIOUSLY EVALUATED EMPTINESS OR NON-EMPTINESS. ————————————————— THAT'S THE SPANNER IN THE WORKS -'ROD'- WE MUST REMOVE. SO OF COURSE WE IN OUR NATIVE TONGUE OF A FEW YEARS, WAILING IN THE WINDS OF CHRIST'S, PUN INTENDED AFTERMATH, DE- AXIOMATIZE NON-EMPTINESS. THEN AS NECESSARY WE DID SOME HEAVY LIFTING TO EXPUNGE THOSE MINUS ZERO'S FROM OUR INSTANTIATED MATH REAL, AKA REDO PARADIGM! | image tagged in memes,waiting skeleton,uncle,just uncle,literally uncle,so tragically objectively uncle | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Waiting Skeleton memeCaption this Meme
4 Comments
Lyoll M
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Ring galaxy | BUT STILL SEEK CLARITY | image tagged in ring galaxy | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Approved, despite "contray" and "zero's" as a plural.
TheseSharesAreAboutNotSharing
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Are you daft. In the words of Seth Rogen who I know through an acquaintance of a business partner of a family member, in his movie shtick for 'Knocked Up': 'Who gives a rat's ass?!' If I generously choose to poorly draft/sketch over and over iNvAlUaBlE theorems on some deflated website that is dust, why make it worse with trollish apologetics. Why throw it all back in my face what is giving. That is not going to help drive the project. Why not share my junk and maybe someone else besides yourself will comprehend. Can you learn to read what the symbols and words I am using are stating. That might help to change ANYTHING, otherwise, nicely I ask again, hyt [hold your tongue].
Lyoll M
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
I'm not daft, I just care a lot about how math is communicated. It is, among other things, what I get paid to do.

Again, I suggest to you that your problem in communicating is not that the infinity symbol or any of the other math symbols you are using are difficult: it is that you are not communicating your ideas well.
TheseSharesAreAboutNotSharing
0 ups, 3w
Sorry. Deleted rambling comments to max-char limit of text fields, as conciliatory gesture (after screen captures for sentimental back up). I am aware of the direction the effort is being guided in. Scholarly work in a scholarly place of work for scholars whom do scholarly work in those places.

That said. Tried one more time with submission. Am completely ok with your final decision to feature OR not. Really am so passionate it's not easy to stop sharing math.

I appreciate your encouragement that I keep trying. However I think positive re-enforcement is triggering a demotivational response.
Waiting Skeleton memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
AWESOME A LENGTHY TEMPLATE FOR THE TEXT THAT ANOTHER POPULAR MATH STREAM CALLS A 'RAFT OF WORDS'. IN OUR HUMBLE OPINION THEY SEEM TO BE TOO PROUD TO GET IN A JET BOAT WHEN OFFERED A RIDE. ANYWAY. SINCE APPARENTLY WE'VE BEEN RELEGATED TO THE JUST FOR FUN STREAM, WHY NOT HAVE FUN. I DO NOT MEAN EITHER ROASTING MORE CONDUITS FOR MATH. ————————————————— I MEAN INSTEAD -THE CLOCK IS TICKING ON THESE LARGE INSPIRED TEXT BLOCKS AS MY WRISTS TIGHTEN UP- WHY NOT SHARE WHAT'S GOING ON. SURE THERE HAVE BEEN A HUNDRED FEATURES WITH A FEW REJECTS. THERE HAVE BEEN MANY HUNDREDS OF UN-DOCUMENTED PROOFS THIS YEAR. WE KNOW WE ARE IN THE RIGHT AND THE KNOWN POPULAR OVER REACHING IDEAS ON MATHS ARE WRONG. ————————————————— NO JUDGEMENT. I MEAN LOOK AT DYSON. OR ROWLINGS. OR ME. WHAT IS TOUGHER TO SELL. MUSH? THE MOON ITSELF. SO I CANNOT GET UPSET ANYMORE. THOUGH IT IS PROBABLY THE CASE THE FOUNTAIN WILL BECOME UNUSABLE FROM DISUSE. GOD THAT OTHER MOD WAS COMPARING PRODUCTIVE EFFORT TO PUPPIES AND SMILING CHILDREN. WHAT CAN YOU DO. ————————————————— ANYWAY I REALIZED OUR LATEST CATCH EARLIER THIS HOUR. IT WAS REVISITING A PREVIOUS RARELY RE-USED APPROACH. WHO AM I KIDDING. NO ONE IS LISTENING. IT DOES NOT MATTER WHEN I COMPARE A FOUNDATIONAL LOGIC/ALGEBRA TO A INFINITE STRING OF ADVERBIAL MODIFIED PRIMITIVE 'NO-INGS' PUN INNAPLICABLE. ME WAITING FOR COLLEAGUES TO BE AWARE WE ARE NOT INEPT; ALL THE WHILE WE HOLD FAST TO OUR PREFERENCE FOR INEPTITUDE; THIS STREAM IS CREDITED ELSEWHERE, IN THAT OTHER STREAM, WITH ACCEPTING LOGICAL TREATISE. YET CAN FEEDBACK BE GIVEN. CAN CHANGE BE CONCEIVED. WE HOPE. SO IF ZERO IS EXCLUSIVELY ZERO-ISH THEN BEING SO PLAIN SPOKEN WE ARE SURE RO BE ACCUSED OF BLASPHEMY IN 'MATHS'? ————————————————— WELL IT'S NOT BECAUSE ZERO IS AN ACT OF ESTABLISHING THAT IS JUST AS MUCH AT A CONTRAY DISADVANTAGE AS ADJECTIVIALLY CHARATERIZING ZERO ITSELF AS 'IS-EMPTY' OR 'IS-NOT-EMPTY'. WHY THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN ADVERBIAL AND ADJECTIVIAL MODIFICATION? WELL BECAUSE THE LATER DOES PRESUME AXIOMATIC ZERO. THIS THEN DENIES A DECONSTRUCTION OF A PARADOXICAL FOUNDING. ————————————————— THAT IS AN INFINITE TREE OF (IS)(IS-NOT) MODIFIERS TO (NOT__FULL_STOP) ITSELF HAS NO INTRIGUING DIAGONALIZATION. ON THE OTHER HAND AN INFINITE TREE OF (ISLY)(IS-NOTLY) MODIFIES TO (ISING,ISN'TING) IS INTRIGUING. THERE CAN BE AN UNLOGICALLY ENUMERATED ABSOLUTELY REPETIOUSLY EVALUATED EMPTINESS OR NON-EMPTINESS. ————————————————— THAT'S THE SPANNER IN THE WORKS -'ROD'- WE MUST REMOVE. SO OF COURSE WE IN OUR NATIVE TONGUE OF A FEW YEARS, WAILING IN THE WINDS OF CHRIST'S, PUN INTENDED AFTERMATH, DE- AXIOMATIZE NON-EMPTINESS. THEN AS NECESSARY WE DID SOME HEAVY LIFTING TO EXPUNGE THOSE MINUS ZERO'S FROM OUR INSTANTIATED MATH REAL, AKA REDO PARADIGM!