unlikely am really: no scree just honesty; if wrong math piled up for half a millennia; is wrong to presume something is rigged

Better writing will make you a better mathematician too. From the Common Core standards of mathematical practice, standard 6: "Attend to precision:
Mathematically proficient students try to communicate precisely to others. They try to use clear definitions in discussion with others and in their own reasoning. "

Are you are accusing one iota of plagiarism in any of my submissions? BTW would you understand a well written published journal article. I seriously doubt or you would not be here. I DO APPRECIATE THE CONSIDERATION YOU'VE GIVEN TO REPLY AND SO PITIFULLY APOLOGIZE FOR METAPHORICALLY BITING A HAND THAT IS ATTEMPTING TO FEED ME. C-a-n y-o-u f-i-n-d a b-e-t-t-e-r f-o-o-d s-o-u-r-c-e o-r s-o-m-e-n-e q-u-a-l-i-f-i-e-d t-o g-r-ow i-t. m-y f-a-t-h-e-r u-s-e-d t-o s-a-y o-u-r f-a-m-l-y-'-s s-c-o-l-a-r-s-h-i-p [sorry: un-intentional pun-mixing the metaphors] w-a-s a r-a-n-c-h. n-o-w i f-e-a-r w-e a-r-e b-e-c-o-m-e t-he l-i-v-e-s-t-o-c-k.

Of course, I'm not accusing you (or any letter of the Greek alphabet) of plagiarism. Plagiarism means copying someone else's work, and I imagine it would be hard to find published work to copy in this messy form.

I'm encouraging you to frame your thinking in clear and concise ways.

I actually read the entire farrago of text on this meme; I'd lay good odds no one else will. And not because you're an outsider genius (which may or may not be true -- I don't have the material to judge), but because it is NOT WELL WRITTEN. I promise you, great cascades of text neither make your point better nor show better thinking.

And, yes: I would understand a well-written published journal article in general, despite my lack of a college math degree. However, before you get to publishing articles in journals, you'll need to write clear SENTENCES.

In conclusion: you are getting feedback that you should really consider, if your dream is being published, being read, being taken seriously as a thinker. Communication skills count.

But your implicature DID IT AGAIN! 'hard to find published work to copy in this messy form.' It's not hard to find it's impossible. These theorems do not exist elsewhere as a mess or as the pristine translated visions of God's own imaginings. So stop being so silly with your intimations. ICNRAW [I cannot read another word].

It's impossible because the editors of any math journal, or any professional journal, would laugh themselves silly at the poor writing skills.

"implicature" --> implication

I did not mean to talk to you like an adult. Take some time, learn all you can, see how tough original thought can be, maybe be compassionate towards elders, and then revisit these mad writings. No one else may understand them either when/if re-shared by yourself.

Mirror talk

Using large words incorrectly does not help your case. Implicature "the action of implying a meaning beyond the literal sense of what is explicitly stated" does not apply when it was extremely direct.

What? "BTW would you understand a well written published journal article. I seriously doubt or you would not be here" would also apply to you.

"You are responsible for your own communication and for being understood. "