5 point Calvinism not Calvinism entirely. The extreme interpretation which is more hyper is what I speak of. Guys like MacArthur, Sproul, Piper etc present a creed only nuanced Gnostic subtly catholic lie. Limited atonement is the big issue and is false. Just like 5 point Arminians are legalistic and semi-Palagian 5 point Calvinists are semi-Gnostic. Gnostics believe in spiritual Gnosis but they find it by discovering the divine spark within. We are made in His image & have the attributes from the Fall but not enough to "do it ourselves" but man is still human & can receive Christ. God didn't "make some for glory & others for destruction" which is just a "God designed" Gnosticism but so subtle that even the elect would be deceived if possible. I believe predestination, free will & God's knowledge of counterfactuals all come together for a more divine and more human truly Biblical context. I go to Him alone & pastors mostly teach heresy or Pharisee. I fault Calvin's successor Theodore Beza not Calvin for the twists. Catholic twists are canons, catechisms, confessions & filtering scripture through man's expository instead of the other way around.