Ongoing Scrutiny - is evidence of animus against Trump, not any kind of evidence of improper conduct.
The "evidence presented in public discourse" - all seems to date back to the 1990's, at which point Jeffrey Epstein hadn't been convicted of any kind of crime. So that would be evidence of 'free association', which, aside from being protected by the 1st amendment - is fairly understandable, when you understand that they both travelled in the circles of the rich and famous.
Trump was there because of who he was known to be, and what he had accomplished/accumulated in business amd entertainment. Epstein appears to have been there because he was operating a Zionist Empire Intelligence Operation - compromising wealthy and powerful individuals, with a fairly standard Blackmail/Honeypot tactics.
