A couple of similar studies, proving these same points - were delivered to the FDA/CDC and NIH, by November of 2021 & ignored

COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals

This study aimed to evaluate the risk of adverse events of special interest (AESI) following COVID-19 vaccination from 10 sites across eight countries.

This multi-country analysis confirmed pre-established safety signals for myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Other potential safety signals that require further investigation were identified.

The study found that the most significant excess mortality event during the pandemic period was not caused by Covid at all. Excess deaths spiked due to people dying from the flu after they received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24001270?via%3Dihub

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/lessons-learned-paper-6-dead-for every life even potentially "saved" from Covid1984

Executive summary

Recently, I tried to locate a paper I co-authored and despite lots of effort, I couldn’t locate it. You just get links to the retracted paper in Cureus. You can’t find the republished version.

Here are the links to the papers which have been republished in a non-corrupt medical journal (that is not indexed by PubMed):

COVID-19 Modified mRNA “Vaccines”: Lessons Learned from Clinical Trials, Mass Vaccination, and the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex, Part 1 and Part 2

Hopefully, people will now be able to find these important papers since my Substack is indexed in Google.

I’ve also submitted the two papers to the React19 science page which has 3,751 papers with COVID side effects, but not these two papers.

And to save you the time of reading the papers, here is everything you need to know:

“For every life theoretically saved, there would be approximately 6 times (7.2 – 1 = 6.2) more deaths caused by the modmRNA injections.”

Czech data confirms no benefits
There is only one publicly available dispositive data source with record level data where you can see for yourself exactly what happened. That’s the Czech Republic dataset.

See: The Czech Republic record level data can be used to prove that the COVID vaccines had mortality benefits for the details.

Summary
The bottom line is:

All cause mortality during non-COVID periods skyrocketed after the COVID vaccines were rolled out to a population. This highly suggests the vaccines made people more likely to die.

Vaccinated vs. unvaccinated cohorts appear to do proportionally equally worse during COVID waves suggesting no beneficial effect of the vaccine against COVID.

The evidence is so overwhelming and yet the Covid cult will continue to deny... smh

https://substack.com/@anotherworldviewispossible/note/c-100871744

https://youtu.be/E05mJAmi_8s

Jimmy Dore - "Doctors 'Baffled'"

https://youtu.be/xVRQ6swpES0

Jimmy Dore - who was injured by the Experimental, Synthetic mRNA, Gene Therapy, Lethal Injections - speaks with his OWN Doctor, who did a couple of similar studies, proving these same points - which werr delivered to the FDA/CDC and NIH, by November of 2021 - but which were refused publication, without any peer-review. The Biden/Fauci FDA wasn't interested.

Congress made crucial change to vaccine definition weeks before COVID-19

The US government’s definition of ‘biological product’ up until December 2019 may have prohibited the mRNA COVID-19 products from being labeled as vaccines.

Without a quiet change to federal law just before the onset of COVID-19, the experimental, mRNA COVID jabs may never have been labelled as vaccines.

The December 2019 change to the definition of “biological product” is found in the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020

SEC. 605. BIOLOGICAL PRODUCT DEFINITION.

Section 351(i)(1) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262(i)(1)) is amended by striking “(except any chemically synthesized polypeptide).”

KIND OF A HEAD SCRATCHER.....COINCIDENCE? OR PLANNED?

Climate change is a hoax. How many official temperature collection points are near large swaths of asphalt? In the middle of cities where there is next to zero unpaved ground?
No, that data is corrupted by the environment in which it is collected.

I believe that the Earth's climate has always fluctuated. Scientists say that New York was under thousands of feet of ice just a few millennia ago. Are we supposed to believe that cavemen caused the Earth to warm up and melt that ice? Or is it possible that the Earth, on it's wobbly, elliptical path around the Sun has ALWAYS had a variable climate that has nothing to do with anything that anyone living here did to cause that change?

More taxes are sure to change that. 🤪

yes, the temperature of the earth has always been fluctuating, but recently, there has been an enormous spike. that is climate change. if you don't believe me, then go to a bleached coral reef and ask yourself how such a large amount of biodiversity has been destroyed

Bleached coral reefs are a byproduct of ocean acidity - not temperatures.