"And the men [women] who hold high places must be the one's to start, to mold a new mentality closer to the heart.'~Rush

SMALLEST PRIME THAT IS SUM OF PRIMES, 2 WAYS; IS THIS IMPORTANT. WELL WE COULD MAKE A BIJECTIVE FOR SUMS IN N WAYS. THAT IS THERE SHOULD BE AS MANY PRIMES AS THERE NUMBERS THAT ARE SUMS OF TWO PRIMES IN HOWEVER MAY WAYS. THEN THREE IN HOWEVER MANY WAYS. THEN FOUR AND SO ON. HOWEVER AT INFINITY THE NUMBER OF WAYS WOULD BE JUST ONE. SO APPARENTLY OUR BIJECTIVE WOULD HAVE TO INVOLVE ORDERED SETS OR PERMUTATIONS. THAT IS THERE ARE AS MANY PRIMES AS ORDERED PAIRS OF PRIMES, ORDERED TRIPLETS. QUADRUPLETS, ETC. YET THEN HEY WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE ARE FACED WITH ORDERING BASED UPON SIMILAR DIGIT SEQUENCES. PRESUME CONJECTURALLY THAT SOME SET OF INFINITE PRIMES HAS A TRAILING BIT SEQUENCE OF ALTERNATING ONE'S AND ZERO'S: ".....010101010101". THERE'S NO WAY TO ORDER THIS SET BASED UPON THE LEADING WHATEVER BIT SEQUENCE AT INFINITY SUCH AS: "11100101110000.....". PERHAPS THEN IT WOULD BE REASONABLE TO CONCLUDE THAT OUR BIJECTIVE WAS ONLY POSSIBLE WITH RESPECT TO PRIMES THAT HAVE INFINITELY DISORDERED BIT SEQUENCES. THAT MAKES THESE PRIMES ESSENTIALLY REAL IN NATURE. SO IF WE HOPED TO MAKE A BIJECTIVE BETWEEN PRIMES AND REALS FOR INFINITE ACCOUNTING WE'D BE BACK AT SQUARE ONE. YET WHY STOP THERE. ISN'T IT BEST TO COUNT DISORDERLY REAL STRINGS WITH DISORDERLY INTEGER STRINGS GENERALLY. SO TAKING THE ISOMORPHICALLY REVERSE PERSPECTIVE IT'S BEST TO NOT COUNT INFINITELY WITH ORDERLY STRINGS. THEREFORE WE ASK IF THE REAL BITSTRING: '0.11111111......." IS MORE ORDERLY THAN THE INTEGER BITSTRING: "111111.....111111. IT IS BECAUSE INFORMATION THEORY TELLS US THE GREATER UNIFORMITY OF A STRING THE LESS INFORMATION IT CONTAINS. YET THIS INTEGER INFINITY TIMES THE REAL HAS A SUM OF ITSELF PLUS THE INTEGER STRING. WHEREAS INFINITY TIMES THE INTEGER STRING HAS MERELY A DUPLICATE OF ITS BITSTRING. COPIES OF THINGS WE PRESUME PROVIDE EXTRA INFORMATION. THEREFORE IF OUR CONCEPT OF COUNTING ORDERLY THINGS WITH EQUIVALENT ORDERLINESS (OF THINGS) HAS ANY VALIDITY. THEN IT CANNOT MAKE SENSE IN THE FIRST PLACE TO SUGGEST THAT EVERY DISTINCT INTEGER CAN COUNT EACH DISTINCT REAL. THERE'S NOT ENOUGH INFO IN WHAT WE TERM A VENOMOUSLY ENDLESS STRING OF ONE'S TO COUNT IT'S VENOMOUSLY ENDLESS STRING OF DECIMAL ONE'S. SO THEN WE THOUGHT HOW TO COUNT RATIO'S OF REALS OVER THEMSELVES OR ZERO POWERS WHICH MUST ALL PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION THEN MERE UNIT DIGIT ONE BECAUSE UNIT DIGIT ONE COULD BE DEFINED AS THE RATION OF A ZERO POWER OF THE VENOMOUS INTEGER. I MEAN WE THOUGHT THAT CLEARLY WITH THIS PROOF. SO TO PROVIDE THAT INFO THESE THEMSELVES BECOME VENOMOUS RATIO'S. WE CAN MODEL AS STEP-WISE COUNTS OF REALS THAT ARE IRRATIONAL AND POSITIVE OR STEP WISE THAT ARE TRANSCENDENTAL AND NEGATIVE. WHY DOES THE RATIO OF TRANSCENDENTALS TO THEMSELVES CONTAIN EVEN MORE INFORMATION. PRETTY MUCH THEIR DEFINITION WHICH MAKES THEM UNDEFINABLE AS POLYNOMIALS. SO NEGATIVE INTEGER ONE'S STRINGS ALSO HAVE MORE INFO THAN POSITIVE. LET'S NOT MAKE A CONVOLUTED PROOF. THERE'S A EXTRA SYMBOL IN THE FORM OF THE NEGATIVE SIGN THAT IS DIS- UNIFORM WITH RESPECT TO THE ONE'S SYMBOLS. THAT IN TURN MAKES ZERO POWERS OF TRANSCENDENTALS HAVE NO OTHER MORE-INFORMATIVE OPTION! WE ARE UNSURE YET IF THE GOLDEN RATIO AND SILVER RATIO ZERO POWERS ARE ANOTHER HIGHLY SPECIALLY ULTRA- LESS UNINFORMATIVE REALS. WHATEVER THE POINT IS THAT WHILE NEITHER THE POSITIVE NOR NEGATIVE INFORMATIONLESS VALUES, VENOMOUS AND RAVENOUS, RESPECTIVELY ARE EXPECTED TO FULFILL THEIR COUNTING OBJECTIVES FOR INFINITE STRINGS?? THE NEGATIVE ZERO REAL IS THE SPANNER IN THE WORKS [R.STEWART...KIDDING]. IT DOES NOT NEED TO BE COUNTED AT ALL. YET ITS INFORMATION DEFICIT IS NULL. NEG ZERO NEVER NEEDED AS NULL VALUE TO BE COUNTED BY INFINITE STRINGS. SO AS ANOTHER PRESUMPTION -NOT ASSUMPTION, WE KNOW OUR MESS- TO MOVE THINGS ALONG. THE FINITE INTEGERS CONSTITUTE COLLECTIVELY THE FULL INFORMATION DEFICIT WITH RESPECT TO REAL COUNTS. AND THAT DEFICIT FOR POS AND NEG FINITE INTEGERS IS MORE THAN SUFFICIENT TO COUNT POSITIVE ZERO. MIC DROP. 7