Sam Elliott special kind of stupid

Nice whataboutism.

Disnit ?

Rotflmao

Spelling all you got? I don't have the luxery of a full keyboard when i consume my imgflip...have fun in your moms basement! Oh ypu are doing at work...nice wage theft!

No, it's not in the context of fraud. No fraud is shown here at all or even alleged in that funding. Further it was not well known that SAID committed fraud all over the place at the time.
https://www.mercurynews.com/2025/02/07/melania-and-ivanka-trump-praised-usaid-for-funding-their-white-house-proje

But nice further whataboutisms. Trump's tariffs where to get negation leverage on Mexico and Canada to get them to help secure the boarders of the USA and they worked. Being of a completely different context. So you're once again giving me falsehood to reinforce your TDS.

So melania wasnt fruadulent? DONNY HAS MORE MONEY THAN GOD DONT YOU KNOW?

Yep, another whataboutism and dropping the context. You failed to even try to show fraud in the aid to Africa.

Fraud is fraud, right? Why not use my example as an agreement as to seeing how much fraud there was? Double down on calling me wrong! Hilarious

You still haven't even tried to show fraud in the aid to Africa.

That is not my soapbox.....i fully understand there was fraud...the fact that MAGA cannot even see Melania as fraud is what is so hilarious!

Dude you need to understand....i am conservative...live and let live. If you want to have your wife peg you on a saturday night while you wearing a pink wig concerns me not. I care about whether you are capable of self support, and not relying on my tax dollars to survive.

That stands for US citizens. Now my take on other nations. I would rather pay $10 a year to keep them in their country, than $1400 a year if they are here.

Please recall, the person you voted for Congress has been funding this nonsense for all time.....so your outrage is delayed.

Nothing like being woken up, huh?

You still haven't even tried to show fraud in the African aid. It's a necessary part of your argument to do so. But thanks for the insults to cover your lack of support of your point.

Dude which part I don't have to because it is inherent dont you understand?

And in perfect play, you still can't admit Melania was fraud.

So, i agree there was waste and abuse, you cannot!

You still haven't even tried to show fraud in the African aid. Your making the assumption that this part of the USAID action held fraud instead of showing it and thus are talking in a circle to bypass the need to prove your position.

"Circular reasoning is a logical fallacy that occurs when the evidence used to support a claim is the same as the claim itself. It's also known as a circular argument.
Explanation
Circular reasoning is a pragmatic flaw in an argument.
It's a type of informal logical fallacy.
It's logically invalid because it doesn't justify the conclusion.
It can be convincing because repeating the same thing makes it seem self-evident.
Examples
"Our boss is the best person for the job because they were promoted to boss"
"People have free will because they can choose what to do"
"There is irrefutable proof of alien abductions, so it's clear that humans have made contact with aliens"
"Chickens hatch from eggs, but an egg does not exist unless a chicken lays it, and yet a chicken must hatch from an egg"
Similar fallacy
Begging the question is similar to circular reasoning, but it occurs when you assume what you are trying to prove."

So you want to shift the goalpost from a specific instance to in general? Properties don't carry over from the general to every part.

Ok. Get well.

Rotflmao