“Well he established the rules to make the universe make sense a simple by product of creation the designed it specifically, and guided it to form us.”
And how exactly do you know this? Another “ad hoc” argument?
“Also in the which God category flying spaghetti is a human creation because the religion doesn’t come from the original creators of spaghetti,”
The point was not about spaghetti, thou most enlightened, most prudent, wise and astute sage. The point was this, that even if we could prove somehow the existence of a creator, how the f**k do you know that it is YOUR god, and not some other entity? Do you not realise that these “arguments”, if they really worked, could as well be used to demonstrate the existence of Zeus, or Odin, or any other god/goddess/supernatural being whatsoever? Also, for what f**king reason should there be only one creator? Why not a thousand of them?
“however our undesigned coincidence form a completed puzzle”
What “undesigned coincidence”? Are we to accept every stupid, senseless story just because some pieces of information seemingly coincide? If this is the case, we should also believe the ancient Greek or Roman myths, or any similar stuff. What about those pieces which contradict each other in a most erroneous way? What about the four TOTALLY DIFFERENT resurrection stories? BTW, I asked the very same question a few days ago, and you didn’t even make an attempt at answering it. It is not difficult to see why. “A completed puzzle”, of course. It’s so complete, that you f**king christians can’t even agree which books are contained in your Bible (or should I say Bibles?), and even if you could, you still don’t agree on how to interpret it “properly”.
Caption this Meme
