We are all children within the love of God.

i have no idea

An honest answer, have an upvote.

Absolutely nothing, the Bible doesn’t revolve around politics, and she honestly trashed her church with liberal ideology

How is it liberal to show empathy? Ben Garrett, a Deacon from Utah, called her a "Deceiver." and went on to say "Do not commit the sin of Empathy." Then, he later wrote "She hates God and His people, you need to properly hate in response." That's the sort of vibe I am getting from you right now.

Cool that u googled a random bad pastor, fun fact there’s a lot of them, it was wrong to accuse trump of causing fear, she wasn’t showing empathy, she was making accusations against trump, also if a pastor says we should hate people, they are stripped of the title God gave them

What accusation did she make?

Simply that trump is to blame for lgbtq fear

When did she say that?

She implied that lgbtq was afraid of trump becoming president

How is that assigning blame to him? That's not an accusation, that's a statement of fact. People are afraid whether she makes the accusation or not. As President, the leader of the USA, is it not his job to know when his people are afraid?

I read your comment again and deleted my comment in response. The original is above this message. I just wanted to add that you state she didn't even directly say it... but she implied it. Are we working with what we *think* people are saying now? Because the whole premise of Trumps 1/6 impeachment was (as MAGA Republicans would say) about what Democrats *thought* he said.

"2.9 BILLION Reasons Catholic Bishops Loved Biden But Hate Trump

For the past four years, many Catholics have been perplexed as to why most Catholic bishops have refused to condemn Joe Biden’s heinous anti-Catholic policies. Additionally, these bishops have openly welcomed Biden to receive Holy Communion, in spite of Canon 915 stating Catholics who “obstinately persist in manifest grave sin, are not to be admitted to Holy Communion.” It will be of little surprise if Biden goes-down in history as America’s most radical anti-Catholic president.

The Biden administration granted Catholic NGOs nearly $2.9 billion in immigration-related funding over the past four years. That’s more than TRIPLE the level of funding under Trump’s first administration and nearly DOUBLE the amount awarded under the Obama administration over the course of EIGHT YEARS!
"
FROM THE "ALMIGHTY GOD" .....TO THE "ALMIGHTY DOLLAR"...."

Lol.

LOL... mock all you want... but these are the facts...

The Biden administration granted Catholic NGOs nearly $2.9 billion in immigration-related funding over the past four years. That’s more than TRIPLE the level of funding under Trump’s first administration and nearly DOUBLE the amount awarded under the Obama administration over the course of EIGHT YEARS!

You think circling the word "opinion" is "mocking?" ROFL

The numbers are not opinions... ROFL...

You're absolutely right, the numbers themselves aren't opinions—no one's disputing that. What's opinionated is how those numbers are framed and interpreted. The article you cited explicitly calls Biden 'America’s most radical anti-Catholic president' and implies the funding was some kind of payoff to Catholic NGOs. That's not a fact—it's editorialized speculation. If you're going to rely on a source that frames its arguments with such blatant bias, it doesn't matter how many numbers it throws around; you're still promoting an agenda disguised as analysis. ROFL.

Biden gave 2.9 Billion over 4 years
That's more than 3 times what Trump gave in 4 years.
That's almost double what 0bama awarded in 8 years...

LOL

Not opinion...

Biden’s administration had significantly increased funding for Catholic NGOs involved in immigration efforts, showing a commitment to humanitarian aid and faith-based outreach. At $2.9 billion over four years, this funding has helped religious organizations provide food, shelter, and legal support for migrants, aligning with Catholic teachings on compassion and charity. Compared to Trump’s administration, which reduced funding for such programs, Biden’s policy reinforced the role of faith-based organizations in addressing global crises and supporting vulnerable communities.

Imagine that, a Christian living up to his values from a place of power.

Imagine... taking an oath to protect America and then letting in all those criminal illegal aliens... even funding their entry...

The funding in question wasn’t for ‘letting in’ anyone—it went to Catholic NGOs that provide food, shelter, and legal support to migrants already in the system. Immigration policy has been a challenge under every administration, and aid organizations have long played a role in addressing humanitarian needs. If the concern is about border security, that’s a separate discussion from whether faith-based groups should be involved in humanitarian efforts. Do you think churches should not be involved in providing humanitarian aid?

The funding was to finance illegals into the US... oops

"It's not US Taxpayers burden to inform them [immigrants] of anything."

I see your frustration. No one likes their tax dollars funding things they don’t support. But justice isn’t about personal preference. Rights exist for everyone, not just the people we like. If we start deciding who deserves them, then they don’t mean anything.

A truly moral society treats everyone with fairness and dignity, especially the vulnerable. Justice isn’t real if it only applies to certain people. Helping those in need doesn’t weaken a country—it strengthens it. And if we claim this is a nation of religious values, we have to actually follow them, even when it’s hard.

Sure, Biden's spending is nearly half of what was spent on the Catholic Church in the previous 16 years. I don't deny that and I'm not defending it. Rather than being critical of Biden and how he spent federal money. Perhaps instead, your ire should be directed at the Catholic Church, and scrutiny should be levied at their budget and how it was spent.

The N in NGO is a lie.

I can see why you would think that it's a government organization for receiving a lot of funding from the Biden Administration.

"The funding was to finance illegals into the US... oops"

The funding was allocated to Catholic NGOs for humanitarian aid, not to 'finance illegal entry.' These organizations assist with food, shelter, and legal processing for migrants, many of whom are asylum seekers or part of legal proceedings. If you have evidence that this funding was used to actively bring people across the border unlawfully, feel free to provide it. Otherwise, this is just misrepresentation of what actually happened.

"A Catholic charity that receives billions in government funding has stirred controversy for a video teaching migrants in the country illegally how to evade US immigration law."

oops

I found the article you quoted from the New York Post, a tabloid-style, conservative-leaning news outlet that often blends sensationalism with hard news and opinion pieces. It becomes clear why you think as you do. Unfortunately, your claim is still misleading at best.

What this video (provided by NYP), is teaching isn't 'how to evade the law'—it's informing people of their constitutional rights, which apply to all individuals in the U.S., regardless of immigration status. The right to remain silent (Fifth Amendment) and the right to refuse unwarranted searches or detainment (Fourth Amendment) are well-established legal principles.

Advising people not to panic, to calmly ask if they are free to leave, and to invoke their right to remain silent is not the same as 'financing illegal entry'—it’s ensuring that due process is followed. The U.S. legal system recognizes that even undocumented individuals have rights under the Constitution.

Are you suggesting that people should not know their rights?

Sure... they were the first to report the story about Hunter's laptop too...

LOL

I see, by "Sure" you agree that people shouldn't know their rights. Is that correct? Or were you dodging the question?

Why can't you answer this easy, American-Friendly question?
I guess you're more concerned with pointing fingers than advocating for humans to know their rights.

There's rules for immigrating to the US... illegal entry is illegal... What's so hard to understand about that?

And even undocumented immigrants have rights. Why are you so aversed to speaking on whether or not you support undocumented immigrants knowing their rights?

It's not the US taxpayer's burden to inform them of anything...

Her church has been infected by the libertarian heresy

And what libertarian heresy is that?

https://youtu.be/D8s2TDoSc00?si=LgTKButDsFemxRLQ

Interesting video... Though, I do have some thoughts on that...
"Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them."
(Matthew 7:15-16a)
"Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You give a tenth of your spices—mint, dill, and cumin. But you have neglected the more important matters of the law—justice, mercy, and faithfulness. You should have practiced the latter, without neglecting the former."
(Matthew 23:23)
"You blind guides! You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel."
(Matthew 23:24)
"A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another."
(John 13:34-35)
"For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways," declares the Lord. "As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts."
(Isaiah 55:8-9)

With that, in what way has her libertarian Heresy manifested through her interaction with Trump in this way, in which she only asks for mercy, and kindness? What about her request do you think Jesus would not agree with?

Ah yes it is merciful to let the dude into the girls bathroom

You're conflating issues that have nothing to do with the discussion at hand. The topic was about showing mercy and kindness, which Jesus explicitly taught, not about bathrooms. If you have a point, at least engage with the argument instead of strawmanning it.

I do honestly apologize for my comments, they were unfounded and abrupt.

Oh wait I thought we were talking about LGTBQ+?

Where?

Nvm

So, what's this libertarian heresy stuff about the meme though? I'm confused.

I thought we were talking about something else but lol I was wrong

No worries. You had just thoroughly confused me. Wanted to make sure we gucci. Peace brother.