And do you want to know the irony? He still hasnt unbanned us, as i tried to reply to him.

can i have the kidney?

Oh really, because you don't act like such

1. I did not know you were a girl, because it is a meme generator, and what if I was a girl? You don't know that. Also, stupidity does not discriminate. Also, you shouldn't be talking when you have no memes to your name, especially when your only here to troll, man, the entire circus clowns are here looks like

You know your rage bait was working fine yk

I take it that you posted this on your pro genocide stream with the hopes that I wouldn’t come across it, given that unlike what you claim in your post, you made 0 effort to reach out to me. Unluckily for you, someone notified me of your “response” to my comment. And you didn’t even include my post and two other comments that just so happen to show sources undeniably proving my point, which is quite an interesting choice, to say the least.

For those who want the full context, here it is btw: imgflip.com/i/9gvshu

On a side note, it’s kind of cute seeing that half your posts are basically just stalking our stream and shitting on us. Tbh I kind of forgot about this stream and never knew you guys still did this. It’s good to see y’all’s still thinking about us, even when we aren’t as active anymore <3

Anyway, I may as well respond to this, even though there isn’t too much to talk about. It’s not like I have anything better to do at the moment.

First of all, the main argument here is basically just whataboutism incarnate. I showed the very real instance in which “Israel” broke a ceasefire to continue airstriking civilians that just happened recently, and instead of responding to it, you make up a headcanon about Hamas having done the same before. If anything, if what you say is true and Hamas has also done this, then you should be condemning such a thing since it’s what you deem something that terrorists would do.

Second of all, I pointed out a very real instance in which “Israel” continued to air strike civilians after a ceasefire was announced, thus breaking it. You’ve mentioned 0 instances and showed 0 sources of the Palestinian resistance doing the same thing.

And third of all, if you want “Hamas” to be eradicated, then maybe “Israel” should consider stop fuсking airstriking civilians. Maybe then people wouldn’t feel the need to join Hamas. Ever thought of that?

1st of all, i did post this meme, in the intent you came across this meme, actually, hell, there are over a hundred memes in this pro "Genocide" stream, when its really not, but in fact, you moderate the actual pro Genocide stream, that i wanted you to come across, you only saw the tip of the iceberg my friend. "Made 0 efforts to reach out to me", proceeds to ignore the fact that you guy still have me banned, for having a different, you seem to not be helping your own argument here, and yet you claim that i don't have a solid argument. Wow. "And you didn’t even include my post and two other comments that just so happen to show sources undeniably proving my point, which is quite an interesting choice, to say the least." I didn't include the rest because 1, the words on the bottom already answered all your question, 2. it debunked your previous claims. So i didn't need to borrow the rest. " it’s kind of cute seeing that half your posts are basically just stalking our stream and shitting on us." Also the lst time i checked, debunking Jihad propaganda, that guys post, is not, "shitting" on you. We are providing the truth, sorry your allergic to such. "Tbh I kind of forgot about this stream and never knew you guys still did this. It’s good to see y’all’s still thinking about us, even when we aren’t as active anymore <3" You know, you act is if we give any f**ks about what you think of this stream.
Now im going to debunk your counter argument, as it is just going to be very easy, as its not hard to debunk brin dead arguments.
1. You showed a very real Jihad propaganda outlet trying to accuse Israel of breaking a ceasefire when in reality, it was delayed because of Hamas, who wouldn't disclose the reason. When the IDF asked for its hostages back, Hamas stated they had to wait, for reasons again, they wouldn't disclose. Heres the proof if you want. https://www.yahoo.com/news/fighting-halts-gaza-ceasefire-deal-145700656.html
Im condemning that actually happened, not the Lala scenario, the Jihad wants you to think. Also, your second of all, is just, your first of all, but with more detail, you could`ve just explained that, in your first of all. "You’ve mentioned 0 instances and showed 0 sources of the Palestinian resistance doing the same thing." If you really were updated with this, when your really not, you can tell a lot of instances Palestine has done the same, hell, their is one day, everyone knows. Also, you wanted proof? I now gave you my source.

Apparently, BBC is now considered a Jihad source in the most moral stream in the imgflip world. Because the source shown in the image was this: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crke088e27lo

I’d say it’s anything but a Jihad source, but ok.

But anyway, at least you gave proof of… something. Honestly, for someone like you, that’s a huge step up. So good for you on that. But let’s break this source apart first, shall we?

In the very short yahoo article that you linked me, it stated that “Israel” was the one who blamed Hamas for the ceasefire holdup.

If you knew even the smallest of details on the Gaza ceasefire, then you would know that it was actually “Israel” which stated that the ceasefire would not begin until the hostages that Hamas would release would have their names released. This might seem fair at first… until you recall that “Israel” continued to air strike civilian targets until this happened.

It even said in the article that you linked the following: “A Palestinian source said continued Israeli air and ground bombardments made it physically difficult to send the list to mediators.” This is supposed to prove your point how?

Later in the article, it said that “Israel” was actually carrying out artillery strikes against what it called “terror targets.” Whatever the fuсk that means.

This statement coming from “Israel” holds no water at all when you realize they have a history of what can only be described as lying. Like when they bombed hospitals and claimed that it was actually hiding Hamas weapons… only for it to be disproven in an investigation. Unless The Guardian is now also somehow a Jihad source.

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2024/dec/11/claims-of-hamas-fighters-in-gaza-hospitals-may-have-been-exaggerated-says-senior-icc-prosecutor

Everyone already trashes BBC with propaganda already, we are just joining the party. In that article it stated "Israeli air strikes are continuing in Gaza ahead of the ceasefire agreement and hostage deal with Hamas, which comes into effect on Sunday, subject to the Israeli cabinet's approval." It states, it comes into affect in Sunday, the airstrike was before it came into affect. As in WW1 while the cease fire agreement were to happen in November 11th, but it wouldn't take effect until 11:00am. I have been giving proof, you refuse to acknowledge something, because you know that it instantly debunks your claims. While yes, Israel was to state that, no ceasefire until Hamas brought bake the hostages, but you refuse to acknowledge is that Hamas delayed the agreement, which would mean, it is not fitting on Israels requirements. You know, you really need to start using what god gave you, but then again, people like you never want to use your brains. And as i said, when Hamas delayed the ceasefire, obviously, it wouldn't take place, so Israel continued to bomb Hamas targets, not civilian, this is reality, not Jihad lala land. Also, what happened to you claiming that my sources are Pro Israel sources, when here you are admitting it was claimed by a Pro Palestinian source? Also, cutting off water was an attempt to dry out Hamas terrorists, now i dont have much more time, but please considere what i said, and educate yourself.

If you need the source which states that “Israel” was the one that would not begin the ceasefire until the hostage names were released, then here it is:

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-pm-netanyahu-says-gaza-ceasefire-will-not-begin-until-hostage-names-2025-01-19/

What, is Reuters also a Jihad source now? Deal with it.

Im continuing where i left off, as Imgflip for some reason has a word limit.

Following the "Also, you wanted proof? I now gave you my source."
Oh but you will just call it propaganda, as always, so were just going to be in a standstill, just calling both our sources propaganda.
Israel is not air striking children, sorry to break the news for you, they are air striking Hamas bases. Hamas has been very good at converting civilian building and areas into their bases. Hospitals, schools, Mosques and Churched are in the question for Hamas. As we seen it in history, but you repel it as much as possible. The only reason why Jihadists like you want to join Hamas is because you are being lied to, and you are being mislead into the path of terrorism. Ever thought of that? No, you haven't, you think the world is your, LaLa land, where everything is what you want it to be, when it is not, their is a saying, everyone loves the sweet lie, everyone hates the bitter truth. Describes Jihadists like you perfectly.

“So we’re just going to be in a standstill, calling both of our sources propaganda”

Oh you fuсking wish. See, the difference between you and I is that I actually understand what sources I’m linking and have a good understanding of what I’m talking about. You’re just linking whatever sources you think will support your viewpoint.

Since you barely even provided an argument, it wasn’t even that hard to respond to you. So I may as well also touch on another claim made in this post. “Says the one who bans anyone with a slight counter argument.” Oh really now? You wanna put your left kidney on it?

Here are examples of 2 posts from Zionists on our stream that we allowed to remain without banning them, you can even look at them right now:

imgflip.com/i/9azqy0

imgflip.com/i/9e9vxg

The difference? They were posting in good faith and were looking to actually engage in debate.

The reason we banned you guys is because you were less concerned with having a genuine discussion and more about brigading our stream to spread Zionist propaganda, leaving us with no choice but to ban you all. If we did the same, then you would’ve also banned us. We’re not deathly afraid of counterarguments, we just don’t want our stream to be overrun with bad-faith Zionist shills.

And I’d like to reiterate once again from my previous comment that you made no effort in reaching out to me, so stop with your bs about you trying to reply to me.

"Since you barely even provided an argument, it wasn’t even that hard to respond to you. So I may as well also touch on another claim made in this post. “Says the one who bans anyone with a slight counter argument.” Oh really now? You wanna put your left kidney on it?" Since you barely described a valid argument, but rather blaint false accusations that are easy to debunk, i would bet both my lungs that you have still banned us, because you couldn't tolerate someone who had a different opinion than you. And i am not wrong. We don't even ban you, for having a different opinion, we encourage a different opinion, so that we can argue and debunk propaganda.
Also, about those 2 Zionist posts, you only allowed, because you yourself, and another moderator you know admitted that your stream was dying, and not because they were in good faith. Here are the quotes, you guys stated yourself.
Definatly_not_with_the_Hamas: "Wow, 5 days without an answer is kinda crazy ngl. It's on us for that tbh, this stream's becoming more dead by the month"
Acollectionofcellsthatmakesmemes:"Well, we are trying to convince people to join our side, and it's not like this stream has had much activity ever since it peaked, so I guess I'll allow this. Definitely_not_with_the_hamas approved another Zionist post asking someone anyway, so why not."
And do you know what else backs this up. I once submitted a meme, that was clearly a Pro Israeli Meme, and you guys still accepted it. Goes to show the fact of how desperate you are.
"The reason we banned you guys is because you were less concerned with having a genuine discussion and more about brigading our stream to spread Zionist propaganda," You guys literally raiding our stream, with a little form of a valid argument, and we didn't ban, we raided your stream with valid arguments, and we were not insulting you and you still banned us. I can understand if we were troll accounts, but were not. So please just accept the fact you guys banned us because you couldn't tolerate a different opinion, and you guys will most certainty lose this argument. Alo, your reasoning tht, we were spreading "Zionist propaganda", is just us describing our POV about the conflict, like you guy are doing right now. That is no reason to ban someone. To your eyes, anyone who is a Zionist, is in bad faith, so you know, to me, and Pro Palestinian Jihadist is a person with bad faith.

“I once submitted a meme, that was clearly a Pro Israeli Meme, and you guys still accepted it.”

Yes, we did, thank you for proving our point. It’s almost like if the post is in good-faith, then we will accept it.

And while it’s true that our stream is becoming more and more inactive, we would rather have no new activity for a year than become a Zionist stream. The reason I mentioned our lack of activity was to provide the reason for why no one responded to the post for 5 days. And the reason Acollectionofcellsthatmakesmemes did it was as an off handed remark, as it was clear that the major reason in his comment was because he’s trying to get people on our side.

It’s also strange to make the assertion that we only approved Zionist posts because our stream was dying, when there are examples of us approving posts that were pro-israel because we believed it was in good faith, BEFORE our stream was on the decline. Case in point, we had previously approved this post and still kept it up to this day:

imgflip.com/i/912eul

And I’d like to reiterate that no, you were absolutely not posting in good-faith by raiding our stream and calling us terrorist while not offering any real counter argument to our ideology, which is why we had to ban you. The only real reason why you haven’t banned us is because we rarely ever interact with this stream, with a few exceptions here and there (such as me right now). If we were stalking this stream every day of the week (which is what you lot are clearly doing considering half your posts are “responses” to ours), then you would’ve had to ban us as well.