Imgflip Logo Icon

But then…. I’m informed.

But then….  I’m informed. | I’m not shocked.  Are You shocked? I’m not shocked; Marko | image tagged in memes,killshot,kills people,not at all shocking unless ur a dumbocrat,progressives leftists fjb voters kissmyass | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
11 Comments
2 ups, 8mo
discord mod | image tagged in discord mod | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2 ups, 8mo
Oh no anyway | image tagged in oh no anyway | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Some easily duped people were removed from rhe gene pool?
1 up, 8mo,
1 reply
i am shocked. that ur using a dumbass website full of shit. try using a website other than this that says the same. i guarantee u will find none
2 ups, 7mo,
1 reply
Dang… you got me there. 92% is the claim in other sources
https://www.biznews.com/health/2023/03/28/covid-deaths

https://www.biznews.com/health/2023/02/23/vaccine-malhotra

I suppose you rely on VALID sources, like CNN MSNBC BBC 😆😂
And, let’s not forget the GAMED DEFINITION OF VAXXED & BS COUNTING SYSTEM.
“Unvaccinated” if it’s been longer than x weeks after your last injection.
“Unvaccinated” if you haven’t had your 3rd booster yet.

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/pdfs/mm7104e2-H.pdf

You don’t like stats that throw shade on the Death Cult Anti-Baptism? Then let me rub this in your face:
100% of VAX ADVERSE EVENTS occurred in the VACCINATED.
ZERO PERCENT occurred in the UNVACCINATED
0 ups, 7mo,
1 reply
jesus christ thats a lot of yap
1 up, 7mo,
1 reply
What a well thought out rebuttal. I also resort to mockery when I am losing an argument.
0 ups, 7mo,
1 reply
You want a rebuttal? fine. You are relying on pure numberage, not percentages. Of course less non vaccinated individuals are dying, because there are less non vaccinated individual. And yes, i do think that you should rely on credible sources, like like the Office for National Statistics (ONS), UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), and World Health Organization (WHO). Classifying someone as "unvaccinated" if it's been less than two weeks after vaccination is standard practice because it takes time for immunity to develop. This is consistent across vaccine studies and isn't manipulation—it reflects biological reality. And you claim that Dr Aseem Malhotra is a valid source, because you see that he is a doctor, and your brain goes into overdrive. He did not become a doctor for yap about vaccines being evil, it was for medicine and cardiology. In college, he was pro vaccine. And "Ever Vaccinated" is not a proper statistic, since vaccines do not claim to solve the problem permanently, due to viral mutation. Also, your "different sources" are still one, far right website that is anti vax. I am yet to find a neutral website that claims vaccines are evil poison. It’s obvious that 100% of vaccine side effects occur in vaccinated people because unvaccinated individuals didn’t receive the vaccine. The definion of side effect is something that occurs because of how the vaccine works. You should really think about the info in your argument before posting it.
0 ups, 7mo,
1 reply
LOL
Maybe you should take a look at who you're replying to, and slow down a little. I didn't make the comment above your previous one. If you have a point to make, then make it like you just did. The dismissive comment I replied to didn't help your case. It just smacks of butthurt.
0 ups, 7mo,
1 reply
i know that was not yours, but you said i did not have a rebuttal. I simply wrote a rebuttal to replace the other one. You really need to learn when you are not being talked to.
0 ups, 7mo,
1 reply
If you wanted to replace the other comment, then why not put it under the other comment? Instead, you put it under my comment. No, you need to learn to address your comments directly to who you're talking to.
0 ups, 7mo
i was informing you of the fact i wrote a rebuttal. The other guy won't care, he went into hysterics.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
I’m not shocked. Are You shocked? I’m not shocked; Marko