Imgflip Logo Icon

Natureal diversity is a good thing, forced destroys nations, leads to poverty, social rejection, charity, and everything that ke

Natureal diversity is a good thing, forced destroys nations, leads to poverty, social rejection, charity, and everything that ke | FROM 2007  SURE, BUT TRUE NONETHELESS, I BEEN SAYING THIS FOR DECADES, OVER DIVERSIFYING A NATION LEADS TO ITS DOWNFALL. | image tagged in diversity,broken,stupid liberals,the truth,political meme,donald trump approves | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
7 Comments
1 up, 1mo,
2 replies
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Sumer and other Mesopotamian Empires, Egypt, Rome, the Incas, Aztecs, Great Mali... you name it, were ethnically, even racially mixed from early on. The people who lived in territories that they spread out into simply didn't disappear to get replaced, they became part of the empires. Same with the Spanish and British empires in more recent centuries, as well as the United States of America.

China and Iran - the world's two oldest countries - have been religiously, ethnically, and racially mixed since their beginnings. Cyrus the Great didn't become the first - and only Gentile -Messiah of the Judeans because there was an opening for the gig.

As for volunteerism and charity in more diverse communities, for one thing they tend to be larger. The larger the population, the less likely for individuals to want to get directly involved. They also tend to be more transitional - waves of ever newer migrates keep arriving, they settle in, then their children radiate outwards to other communities. They might have caught some flack upon arrival from more established inhabitants as well, and that tends to instill something of a lesser drive for more altruistic endeavors regarding the larger population. There's also the notion that there already are sizable established charitable and other organizations geared to helping, so it might be perceived that there's less need to.

But yeah, you compare 20 million people in metropolitan New York to some unknown Hamlet in Scotland where people can trace their roots back to Neolithic times, and yes, there will be something of a pronounced difference in community involvement. Even simple things like PTA meetings and the homecoming HS game. People in small towns are more likely to do PTA, and they even have parades for the homecoming game.

My high school, Fordham Prep, in comparison, couldn't pay people to go to the annual homecoming game against Xavier. Sure, we'd have a rally the day before, and they'd beg students to go, and some do go, but the vast majority couldn't be bothered.

Now if you look at Fordham, the students live in a widespread area, some commuting by rail from farther out in Westchester, as well as Queens, etc. That's a bit of a trek for a measly game, and people have busier lives that don't have a need for football culture becoming as big as it does in Tumbleweed towns.

Meanwhile, as for the dedicated citizenry in smaller towns, they're basically moving out. Economic opportunities are great if....

tbc
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
TLDR
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Oh yes you did, Syd.
0 ups, 1mo
na, I don't read ultra long ridiculous posts form a user that bases his existance on beign annoying, Todd.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
...
Economic opportunities out in Iowa are great if you don't mind looking out the window at illegal aliens busting their backs and knees tending the strawberries while you play on your Xbox all day, but opportunities look far better in larger and more economically sound - you guessed it - mixed cities. So they pack up and move out to Big City, and lend their hand in not giving a crap for total strangers. Heck, if it wasn't for the local church back home with everybody else looking over your shoulder, they wouldn't be giving to charity and volunteering either.

Don't get me wrong, sure, the fact is if they do more, they're doing more. But a big part of that inspiration comes from community pressure as well as simply trying to fit in. Oh, and sheer boredom. There's only so much a continuous supply of six packs of Bud Light and Mountain Dew can do for someone in a day.

You still can't discount the outcome. They do get more involved for whatever reason, and bottom line, that's what counts.

But they're also departing, and moving to areas that are growing, both economically and population-wise. Southern Appalachia may be more homogeneous than the New York Metropolitan Area, but Food Stamps had to be invented for them for a reason. And they're still broke. But at least they got shoes on their feet and aren't restricted to one room wooden shacks with corrugated tin roofs. And as long as you have the diverse population of New York City to pay for it, those people down South won't have to do without.

Plus they get to play with all the gadgets we invent for them over here. Sure, the invention of the Cotton Gin was a BIG deal, but really, how many other inventions have you noticed coming out of the less mixed areas of the Grande South and elsewhere? Why do you have to go all the way west to Southern California to pick up on the slack on the invention front there?

Don't get me wrong, there are countries that started at homogeneous and stayed homogeneous. And none of them ever became empires. None. Because math is a thing.
0 ups, 1mo
TLDR
0 ups, 1mo
That keeps a nation from being united. Is what the rest of that title said.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
FROM 2007 SURE, BUT TRUE NONETHELESS, I BEEN SAYING THIS FOR DECADES, OVER DIVERSIFYING A NATION LEADS TO ITS DOWNFALL.