The left may as well be video projectors... emphasis on the projectors

The whole bear vs man thing was never about men. It's the idea that you'd rather be assaulted by an animal who doesn't understand what it means when you say no versus a person who just chooses to ignore when you tell them to stop.

So all men are rapists, but all them in the woman's locker room.

I never said all men were rapists. I'm saying that men should know better but an animal doesn't, so it's better to be attacked by an animal

Your argument depend on the man automatically being willing to attack, therefore all men are rapists is a logical inference.

No, that's your argument, if it could even be called that.
The poster said no such thing, you did.

Logical inference is a reasoning process that uses available information to make conclusions or judgments. It can be used to fill in missing information and understand the relationships between different statements.
Here are some steps you can take to make a logical inference:
Identify the premise
Ask a question about what is happening
Look for clues
List relevant details
Narrow down the choices
Make your inference
Some examples of logical inference include:
If you see someone make a face after eating a new food, you can infer that they don't like it.
If someone slams a door, you can infer that they are upset.
If you know that cricket is a sport, you can infer that it requires physical effort and usually has a winner.
Logical inference is a fundamental part of mathematics, philosophy, and computer science. A valid argument is when the conclusion is true if all the beliefs are true. An invalid argument is called a fallacy.

Logical fallacy is a reasoning process that is, by definition, a fallacy,,,

Your strawman is a logical fallacy. By definition.

No it's a logical inference that men are likely to rape. The comment makes no sense without that implicit premise. So it isn't my fallacy, the the hasty generalization about men that is the fallacy.

"An implicit premise is an unstated assumption or claim that is used to support a conclusion in an argument. People often leave out implicit premises because they assume the audience will accept them as obvious. However, it's important to identify implicit premises so that you can evaluate the argument's premises as true or false. "

That's how you're interpreting it.

Which raises the question........ How come?

Not all men will attack but it's okay to be scared of people. You'd be scared of a man in a forest too.

It's better to get from a man, than be eaten by a bear. Your fear has reached the phobic level.

there are fates worse than death

It's help or death that are the likely outcomes. I find that you're a sexist bigot due to your phobia.