You provided a source from 'scientific american' saying transgenderism is real
I provided a source showing the editor that article was written under was fired and had a history of faking science to support transgenderism
Your source isn't a scientific opinion, its an agenda opinion peace intentionally being passed off as science
If a man believes he's a woman, that doesn't make him a woman. A system that "affirms" men who believe they're women is not only nonsensical, but also endangers women by opening their spaces to predators who claim to be trans
If a man goes into a women's bathroom, he'll get arrested on charges of voyeurism. According to trans "logic", however, if that same man identifies as a woman, it's no longer a crime. How does that make sense?
I honestly think if they are just pretending to be a woman to get into women's bathrooms, they shouldn't be allowed in any public bathrooms including men's But maybe we should have those gender neutral bathrooms I've been seeing
As much as there is controversial stuff, their is an easy solution. Give them their own separate bathrooms and sport leagues. Besides that, they’d shouldn’t have any specialties and should be treated like everyone else.
While it is real(as in they exist) they aren’t biologically real and should be kept out of sports and bathrooms. Personally they should have their own leagues and bathrooms to prevent conflicts.
If People Who Call
Themselves Trans
Think Feelings Determine
or Supersede Reality,
Why Do They Get
Offended When
Non-Transers
Feel Impelled to
Mock Their Pronouns,
Laugh at Their Getups,
or Ask Them If It's
Narcissism or Predation
That Has Them Taking
Male Parts into
Female Spaces? OzwinEVCG
Caption this Meme
