Don't care whether you like it or not, do your d--- job.

Reports say it is more wide spread than first thought.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14069059/fema-worker-marni-washington-fired-breaks-silence-trump-voting-hurricane-victims.html

Honestly, on the one hand, you do your job. On the other hand, the Trump-cult has this bad habit of falling for internet bullshit then coming out guns blazing. On the third hand, I get the potential motivating factor but still, you do your job.

So you understand why aid workers would avoid demographics with "bad habits"

So we agree that the Trump-cult is a pack of armed, gullible dumbasses?

All I'm saying is that making sweeping statements about entire demographics is not a road you want to continue on

It just so happens that one demographic commits 355.6% more homicides than the general population

That doesn't even qualify as a whataboutism.

Soooo... first you advise against against making sweeping statements about entire demographics and then you make sweeping statements about an entire demographic? Really? Pick a f---ing lane, bro.

And completely totally not even remotely related to the subject at hand, no less.

I'm simply warning you of the logical conclusion of the "Trump-cult has this bad habit" logic

"What then, in your opinion, is the difference between a Trump voter and a 'Trump cultist'?"

My opinion on the matter is irrelevant; the difference between cultists -regardless of flavor- and non-cultists is the cultists' rejection of objective fact in favor of the cult leadership's propaganda.

"Rejection of objective fact"

"Ignoring the months of continuous BLM riots over a fentanyl overdose, the firebombing of pregnancy resource centers, and assaults against random Trump supporters, your argument hinges entirely on an incident where a crowd was coaxed into entering the Capitol."

So you shoot yourself in the foot and then immediately change the subject to a strawman tropic that's already been addressed...

"As for your headline, I never said the Trump-cult has the dangerous-&-crazy market cornered."

Oopsie. 😄

If it weren't for Ray Epps and his friends in the federal government, the Left would have a complete monopoly on political violence.

"If it weren't for Ray Epps and his friends in the federal government, the Left would have a complete monopoly on political violence."

Show me your proof Ray Epps is what you imply. And keep in mind I said proof, not allegations, not insinuations -PROOF. If you can't do that, you should probably take some time do a bit of contemplative reflecting on what separates cultists from rational people.

The media denounced the J6 protesters as "traitors" that tried to "overthrow democracy", then came out to defend the guy seen in multiple videos explicitly telling people to "overthrow democracy". There is zero chance that he's just some regular Trump supporter.

"If you make the assumption that Trump voters are 'a dangerous pack of armed morons too stupid and gullible to be trusted to discern fact from fiction or make rational choices' really, you either have to maintain a double standard, or continue to discriminate against entire demographics"

First off, don't think I didn't notice you disingenuously trying to change the context from Trump-cultists to Trump voters -those two things aren't necessarily synonymous.

Second, the picture speaks for itself.

As for your headline, I never said the Trump-cult has the dangerous-&-crazy market cornered. Again, you have to stop paying attention to what you think someone said and pay attention to what was actually said. Thanks for demonstrating you're operating on your imagination rather than what's happening externally though -it really goes a long way toward supporting my argument. 🙂

What then, in your opinion, is the difference between a Trump voter and a "Trump cultist"?

Ignoring the months of continuous BLM riots over a fentanyl overdose, the firebombing of pregnancy resource centers, and assaults against random Trump supporters, your argument hinges entirely on an incident where a crowd was coaxed into entering the Capitol.

So we do agree that the Trump-cult is a dangerous pack of armed morons too stupid and gullible to be trusted to discern fact from fiction or make rational choices. That's refreshing.

Also, Careful there... you're getting dangerously close to making what is reasonably construable as a threat over the internet. I mean... you could keep going... if you want to gamble on receiving a pardon...

If you make the assumption that Trump voters are "a dangerous pack of armed morons too stupid and gullible to be trusted to discern fact from fiction or make rational choices" based on jack shit really, you either have to maintain a double standard, or continue to discriminate against entire demographics

Speaking of "armed morons too stupid and gullible to be trusted to discern fact from fiction or make rational choices"...

What else ya got?

A biological gender they immediately demand that everyone ignore

"The media denounced the J6 protesters as 'traitors' that tried to 'overthrow democracy', then came out to defend the guy seen in multiple videos explicitly telling people to 'overthrow democracy'. There is zero chance that he's just some regular Trump supporter."

None of that is proof; it's just you pushing assumptive insinuation. If you have a link to a video of Epps rather than Jack Posobiec pushing people to "overthrow democracy," cough it up.

But okay, I'm your huckleberry -let's apply your displayed evidentiary standard of proof to another situation:

Elon Musk is known to have had direct contact with Vladimir Putin, publicly advocated (you know, like Epps when he stated "we need to go into the Capitol") for giving Putin what he wants in Ukraine, wants to force de-centralized, tele-working federal employees back into the office where they're sitting ducks for... let's say a hostile foreign power to take out in one fell swoop with minimal expenditure.

Vivek Ramaswamy is a known Putin apologist who promised to fire federal workers across the board based on an alphabetical system without consideration for the importance of the jobs those workers perform -a move that would throw the U.S. government into a state of dysfunctional vulnerability equivalent to the aftermath of violent overthrow, creating a window of opportunity for a hostile foreign government to move in, strike a killing/crippling blow.

Donald Trump employs the Russian "firehose of lies" technique, has spent the last eight years misleading the U.S., sowing division, stoking distrust and hatred, was criminally indicted for theft of NDI, national security secrets, known to have attempted to set up an unmonitored back channel with the Kremlin, sided with Putin over our own intelligence agencies and wants to give Musk and Ramaswamy the opportunity to put their plans in action.

Under your evidentiary standard of proof, there's no way they're not all agents of the Kremlin working to hand the U.S. to Putin on a silver platter.

https://youtu.be/GazSTh7dzIM?t=33

"https://youtu.be/GazSTh7dzIM?t=33"

Skipping over the fact that your link goes to a clip from a tabloid podcast posted by a known tabloid scandal rag, where in the clip does Ray Epps say "overthrow democracy"? I mean... you did actually watch the thing you pointed to, right?

Epps tells people to go into the Capitol, which, if you believe the media and top Democrats, was an attempt to overthrow democracy

"A biological gender they immediately demand that everyone ignore"

And rightwing Christian militants demand that everyone accept Jesus as their Lord and Savior. What's your point?

My point is that trans ideology is built on the rejection of objective fact

"Epps tells people to go into the Capitol, which, if you believe the media and top Democrats, was an attempt to overthrow democracy"

Okay, so now that you've admitted Epps didn't say the thing you claimed, is it your assertion that the Capitol wouldn't have been breached if not for Epps telling a crowd "we need to go into the Capitol"?

Unless you're willfully obtuse, it's pretty clear I wasn't quoting Epps in that sentence.
Do you believe Trump incited the riot?

"Unless you're willfully obtuse, it's pretty clear I wasn't quoting Epps in that sentence."

Really? So why did you say this about Ray Epps?

"The media denounced the J6 protesters as 'traitors' that tried to 'overthrow democracy', then came out to defend the guy seen in multiple videos explicitly telling people to 'overthrow democracy'. There is zero chance that he's just some regular Trump supporter."

Now that you've effectively proven you're a liar, what's your next move? The smart gambit would be to claim ignorance of definition re: "explicitly". But then that opens the door to discounting every argument you've made from the beginning because, as your claim of ignorance would be supported, re-inforced by your earlier displayed lack of knowledge vis-a-vis "trans", there's no way for a reader to accept anything you say as meaningful specifically due to your demonstrated use of words without understanding their meaning.

"Do you believe Trump incited the riot?"

If a single incident involving Ray Epps advocating criminal behavior before a small group of people to the tune of "we need to go into the Capitol" the night before 1/6 (although being discounted as "FED!! FED!! FED!!") is sufficient to motivate thousands of people to violate the law, then yes, Trump spending two months claiming that the election was stolen, calling the mob the D.C., exhorting the 1/6 mob to move en masse to the Capitol, telling them to "fight like hell or you're not going to have a country anymore" places him in the primary position of culpability for the events of 1/6/21.

"My point is that trans ideology is built on the rejection of objective fact"

Was the 2020 election stolen?

The idea that the claims of fraud are "baseless" is not objective