Crikey so if abortion is a human right, so is the option of murdering your kids, right?

99hwp5.jpg (click to show) - BUT A NON CHOICE .... IS STILL A CHOICE

choose to close your legs 🗣️🗣️🔥🔥

Apparentley according to some the gazillion birth control methods are "not available" to them.imgflip.com/i/9a5wgt?nerp=1731557166#com34135354

most abortion cases are for 3 reasons
1. the mother can’t support the child
the child would have to live a very poor life or be adopted, they are basically saving the child and themselves from poverty
2. cp pregnancy
some pedos will r*** children and then the child will be pregnant, no 11 year old should be a mother
3. risk to mother’s life
in these cases, not doing abortion is worse, since the fetus will die either way

A seed isn't a plant
An egg is t a frog
A fetus isn't a person

A seed might be a plant. There are more than plant seeds.
An egg might be a frog, as many animals lay eggs.
A fetus might be a human. There are many life form that go through this developmental stage.

These things don't digivolve to magically become something completely different.

*A fetus WILL be a human

No, a human fetus is human. That's a tautological, so it's true no matter how you try to look at it. The big ethical question is when it becomes a person and thus has rights. It's also a legal question as persons have a constitutional right to life as well and an inherent moral right to life, Liberals like to skip over answering this question and frame the argument to avoid thinking about the moral and legal question.

Any amount of questioning, and it becomes clear that they lack any coherent morals

Liberals tend not to believe in objective facts, that's why the dismiss facts they don't like and argue based on feelings. It's also why the use word play and framing to change the argument to avoid issues they don't want to be true.

They also try to use extreme cases to justify everything hat doesn't fit that description

That's to invoke emotion. If you look at the extreme cases they usually aren't even what they are presented to be. Even the news misrepresents these so you have to be diligent and double check everything.

A fetus is a parasite and a woman has every right to remove a parasite she doesn't want.

You are a parasite. A fetus is an unborn child.

Fetus can't live without woman's nutrients. Woman has the right to get rid of it if she thinks it is taking too much

Just like how I have the right to stop working if I think my boss is taking too much from me

A 2-week old baby can't live without the mother's nutrients, should we allow mothers to kill their newborn children?

No because a fetus is not a baby. It's a parasite who is part of the woman. A woman's body is her choice

Should abortion be allowed in the ninth month?

Being an unwanted kid is a terrible life

Yeah, you would know, wouldn't you. Also not what i asked.

A fetus is not a part of the mother's body, as evidenced by the fact that they have different DNA

Disfranchising humanity of a human is an old tactic to justify killing them.

killing a plant is not a crime
killing a frog is not a crime
killing a person is a crime

Of course, I don't expect a communist to believe in the value of human life anyway

Communists do believe in the value of human life. I just think a woman shouldn't lose her rights to an unborn baby because she might be tired of carrying it.

Why should an unborn baby lose their life because their mother is tired of carrying them?

Because the mother is living and has a life more important. The fetus can barely feel it anyway.

In the vast majority of cases, the mother will not die if her child is born. Coma patients can't feel pain either, should we kill them?

Even if the woman doesn't die, it might still give her pain. Also removing the fetus is better than killing the baby after it's born. And being an unwanted kid is far worse than being aborted

There is a waiting list to adopt newborns. Do you wish you had been aborted?

Communists believe in human life so much that they murdered hundreds of millions of people.

LOL Commies believe in the value of life! Maybe ask the tens of millions of Russians and Chinese about that onw, or even the Ukrainians!

I hate saying this, but you're thinking of stage capitalism. State capitalism and communism are very different

Well certainly Nazi Germany, China, Russia, North Korea etc cannot argue with that.

If a fetus isn't a person, then why would if a man kills a pregnant woman get double homicide; if a woman does crack and the 'fetus' dies gets involuntary manslaughter?
But don't worry, bad orange man isn't taking away your right to kill babies, just giving the decision to the state and the people.

Difference is if the woman wants the baby

choose to close your legs 🗣️🗣️🔥🔥

Maybe all men should just get vasectomies if their woman doesn't want kids

Or, **don't have sex if you don't want kids**

c o n d o m

don't act surprised if it breaks

i am literally asexual i have no need for one

good for you

What if the father wants to keep his baby?

divorce and adoption

It's the woman's choice

So of a woman decides to keep the child the father should not have to pay child support because it was her choice.

If the father wants the kid too he should pay

If he doesn't he's getting a divorce

Why? If it’s strictly the mother’s choice?