Some things to think about.

... as opposed to democrats, who never let a tragedy go to waste if it'll help them crack down on the 2nd Amendment

well fortunately for the 2nd amendment, the republicans have pointed out the importance of max guns over human lives every time.

Unfortunately for human lives, Kamala wants to "demilitarize" schools by getting rid of resource officers

whereas you believe that more guns are the answer? because knowing that schools are protected by guns will discourage shooters from trying? your guess is wrong. banks and jewelry stores are protected by guns, but criminals still try. any solution that accepts a mix of kids and guns is not smart, to put it mildly. a carzy person will always have an advantage in a guns + kids situation. so, better security? yes. guns, no.

your interpretation of better security is self-servingly inaccurate, but in the spirit of compromise, i offer the reasonable second tactic of rational gun control.

Please define and provide details of the "offering" described
as reasonable and rational:

thanks for asking. i don't like telling people what to do since it can hamper creativity and motivation, but here are a few ideas to get the ball rolling. i'm sure you can find others online.

rational: the means of control should be practical, meaning easily put in place, have low cost, be non-onerous to gun owners, and they should have a logical impact on the goal of saving lives.

reasonable: i'd start by looking at the known chief parameters relating to the perpetrators and weapons of choice in mass shootings, and in school shootings in particular. most school shooters are teenagers, many have easy access to weapons, and all have one or more mental health issues. a logical approach would consider things like raising the legal age of gun ownership, adding laws that require very secure storage of weapons when not in use, and creating a more proactive nationwide approach to good mental health in teens. this should be enough guidance to get you started. i'd be happy to look over anything more detailed that you come up with.

Key word offered is "Ownership"
The property of others, including legal items purchased are none of your business,
especially in the privacy of someone's home.

Just because a teenager gets themselves Hypnotized by immersion into violent first person shooter simulator video games, then "graduates" from their at home repetition training program, by using their developed skills in reality at a shopping mall, religious building, or school.... .

...does not mean the STATE has the Right to confiscate the simulator tool, ie; the PlayStation or X-Box or PC game machine, "Loaded" with first person shooter software,
...as that is personal property that could be loaded with other software "blanks" that doesn't "simulate mass shooting training", that allegedly actually trained and inspired the unfortunate actions, by contributing to dementing the teens mind into the bad mental health.

To advocate otherwise is impractical.

And then there's that other pesky Amendment specific to the individual property:

"The Right To Keep & Bare First Person Shooter Video Simulation Games of Mass Shootings SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ML55uumQgzA

Anderson Cooper is enamored with "Brain Hacking"

What if the teen mental health issue is not just too much time on their phone,
yet that they've been programmed to do what they individually do, based upon their susceptibility and are being USED in the USA as a Weapon for the longterm Progressive Euro Goals of neoMarxism; that of
UN, WTO, WEF, NATO
Agenda 2030 ???

A Military Weapon more dangerous than anything protected by the Bill of Rights.

The expressed perception of accuracy deserves an upgrade, from the spirit of hubris

you could be more empathetic to people just trying to get by in the shadow of your towering intellect.

Says the Saul Alinsky tactic.
My empathy setting is at the correct volume dial setting at the moment,
thank you very much.
Excuse me for the moment, as one Best check the mirror as objects only seem closer than they appear to some driving down the road....

oh, and try contributing to solutions instead of problems.

One can only refer you to the OWNERSHIP REPLY in consideration of the
Property protections within the 4th and 5th amendments of the Bill of Rights.... and then the 1st amendment prior to any necessary discussion about any others...

First of all, there's a financial incentive to rob a bank or a jewelry store, so the people that attempt to do so are radically different from those that perpetrate school shootings.
Second, as in the case of Audrey Hale, she was stopped when police entered the building and shot her. Do you seriously believe the Covenant school would not have been safer if there were officers inside to begin with?

you're right. school shooters are even less rational than robbers. and one example where armed defense prevented loss of innocent lives does not make the tactic generally safe.

It's not safe to have cops in schools?

police carry guns, confrontations lead to shooting, shooting leads eventually to innocent lives being lost. even if data showed that police in schools led to a decrease in school shootings, that can't be the long-term solution. it addresses the violence instead of the causes of the violence. until the causes are addressed, the violence will continue.

"police carry guns, confrontations lead to shooting, shooting leads eventually to innocent lives being lost" this is the same bullshit logic BLM operated under
"until the causes are addressed, the violence will continue" I couldn't agree more. What do you think those causes are?

your contribution to the dialog is noted.

what do you think the causes of that violence are?

*crazy

You are pure evil. You will be defeated

oh? when did Jesus start guiding him? before or after he started molesting women?

Yeah, you are going to need lots. Have some more.