No He Wouldn't And Jesus Wouldn't Make Up Excuses And Conspiracy Theories To Protect A Convicted Rapist Either

You still haven't told us where and when that happened? Or is it just in your mind?

And here's everything you need to know about Trump - here he is misidentifying a photo of his rape victim, who he said wasn't his type, as his first wife.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/0tq3rh6bh_8

And all you need to know is she didn't get the clothes analyzed for DNA because there were too many specimens from multiple men...

Rape apologist much?

oh... and those clothes she said she was wearing... they were not available for sale until years after her "rape"

You can stop using the quotes - the jury found that he did rape her.

On strong feelings only.

Trump's "strong feelings" about refusing to provide a DNA sample to exclude himself from the dress she wore when he raped her, maybe.

How did they find that on hearsay evidence?

It wasn't hearsay evidence - his victim, who he raped, accused him and the jury found him liable.

Based on Hearsay Evidence. Are you obtuse that you don't understand what that is?

Are you so obtuse that you don't understand what it is?

A victim claiming to have been raped is not hearsay - it was HER VA**NA he forcibly penetrated.

Nope... it wasn't a criminal trial...

It didn't need to be - they found him liable for forcibly penetrating her va**na.

He raped her.

It absolutely is not - the judge in the case even came out to clarify the ruling after the fact because Trump's lawyers were out there lying about it.

But do go on believing -those- dumb lies.

Nope... that's a blatant lie...

dems changed the law in 2022 with the financial backing of Reid Hoffman... the same guy who is petrified his name is going to be released from the Epstein client list.

Again it absolutely is not, and the crap you keep posting makes me wonder how it is you think yourself remotely capable of telling truth from lies.

New York has, over the past decade, passed several laws that extend statutes of limitations for heinous crimes - things like child sexual abuse and rape - from a few years to decades. New York law is prospective, and so they've created one year windows during which cases can be brought retroactively.

Imagine being so in the tank for a rapist that you think a state wrote laws which hold rapists accountable, and your first instinct is "ThEy'Re TaRgETiNg tRuMP!"

What evidence do they have of rape? I bet there's no cum, no fingerprints, no pubes... Only thing they have is triggered feminists.

Well, and a jury who said he raped her and was liable for defamation twice for denying it.

Jesus would frown on your repeated lie...