The wealthiest states are solid blue and the poorest are deep red

We should all follow you and read what you post.
If you are against something, that tells us that we all should support it.
If you are for something, we should all be against it.

Welfare should be well regulated…if one has the ability to work, then they should work and get off the government teat. If someone is cheating and taking advantage of it, they should be prosecuted.
If someone truly needs help, they should receive it.

P’raps if we stopped sending our treasure and weapons to Ukraine, if we closed our borders to immigration for at least 10 years, if we stop funding bridges to nowhere and other silly bullshit like treadmills for shrimp and $100 hammers, p’raps we could use those savings to help the homeless veterans and other Americans who deserve it.

We are not you.

A lot of my posts are against trumps admitted pedophilia, and the fact that his supporters encourage it

Why do you support it?

What “admitted pedophilia”?
“The fact that his supporters encourage it”???
You clearly are just gaslighting.

In Advanced Mathematics to disprove a fallacy, it can be accomplished with a single counter example : North Dakota is fourth beating California, Washington and California per world population review com and happens to be Red.

4th?
4th by median household income - and that due to a (temporary) oil boom.

California has the 5th largest economy.
On Planet Earth.

Yet it is covered in human excrement and it’s people are fleeing in droves, as gagillions of illegals swarm across the border to take advantage of California’s citizens total stupidity.

People being displaced by gentrification isn't just people leaving. Housing prices being driven up isn't just for the funzies. They're a pretty good indicator of what people are willing to pay for them.

The price of all homes just went up by $25,000.
Thanks, Kamala!

What does that even mean?

Numbers tied to a standard unit are a good metric, you chose dollars, I chose regional population since it eliminates wealth disparity from billionaires and paupers which your metric ignores. Which approach is better? Others must decide: Is it "total dollars" or "dollars per person?"

Ok, sure, as compared to............... Oklahoma? Alabama? New Mexico? Kentucky? Heck, the entire South?
- Oh, wait, 4th in median household income still? Alright, that means we got 3 entire states ranking above that, and the only thing red about those 3 are the apples they literally grow.

Seems that you forgot your own premise "The wealthiest states are blue... the poorest are red." Your original claim was a bifurcation not a listing. Thus your last comment does not give you the moral high ground you seek. Stranger yet is that if capitalism is your touchstone why do you advocate for Marxists?