Anything that might harm the campaign of the person you want in office so badly is "dangerous misinformation"??? What are you, a CNN anchor?
Was this also the case for the idiot Stephalanosous (or however tf you spell his name) that covered up and censored any information on the woman Bill Clinton r@*ed? Was he censoring dangerous misinformation?
Who gets to decide what is information and what is misinformation? Cause the same side that called any idea of Hunter's laptop "Russian disinformation" got busted as a bunch of liars. This side censored all of Trump's words as misinformation (especially regarding COVID, where all he did was echo what the CDC and WHO said, before they both instantly flipped their opinions 180° so they could accuse him of trying to kill Americans [yes, anyone paying attention to the science department and not just politicians back in 2020 literally saw this happen, and arent making it up or getting it from a Fox article]). The same side that did all that also paints leaders like Karl Marx, Hugo Chavez and Che Guevara as decent people, (i don't think most are brave enough to openly say Stalin and Mao were, though they most definitely believe so), when they were all responsible for the deaths of millions (more millions than America has people, and more than the 200M that died from COVID [yes we remember how well you can count, Kamala]).
So at the end of the day, are they really concerned about misinformation that kills people, or are they just pushing an agenda? Because pushing any form of communism is promoting misinformation responsible for the deaths of millions, and no one seems to give a damn about that. It's as bad as openly promoting Nazism, but almost worse because Nazism doesn't even try to hide its evil and you have to be screwed in the head to be a neo-Nazi, but there's so much manipulation going on in our media that many people who think they're fighting for good fall for communism. If youre really concerned about lives, censor that idea.
