Amazing how fast the facade crumbles when you haven’t known accountability in your entire life.

Your opinion matters less than the dirt under my boot, Richard Spencer fanboy.

You say Zionist as if it is a bad thing. Israel has a homeland now, they plan to keep it. Hating Jews because they want to keep and maintain recovered land is what the anti-Zionist are actually saying. Even if they deny it.

You are the antisemite for conflating Judaism with Zionism.

Bro you have absolutely no right to call anyone an antisemite.

Republicans have been siding with literal Nazis for the last 7 years. I’m in the perfect position to call you an antisemite.

Bro you’ve called for the ethnic cleansing of Jews, you have no right to call anyone a Nazi or an Antisemite.

I’ve called for the illegal occupying invaders of a sovereign land to go home to their own countries. Since when did that suddenly become such a disagreeable position among you people?

Calling Jews “Colonizing Savages” isn’t a very good look now is it?

You might want to look a bit deeper into what Israel's been up to for the last 60+ years before making up your mind about whether using the phrase "colonizing savages" is or isn't "a very good look."

For a tip-of-the-iceberg toe dip, search: "The West Bank: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver"

Is it a bit facile? Yes. Is it flippant? Yes. But that doesn't make it any less accurate.

You might want to look at what actually happened before believing antisemitic lies.

Just for clarity, did you get that from Reddit or Quora... or maybe some other location where it's also amatuer "historians" talking about history?

And since you brought it up, decided to try to frame this as an exercise in "anti-semitic lies," I'll play your game. Let's talk about the "lies" angle: did you maybe notice how the end result of both map groups is the same? Or maybe how, despite the fact that Palestine's been a separate entity officially recognized since the '50s, likewise internationally recognized as illegally occupied by Israel since '67, the 1967-1995 map shows no presence of the West Bank or Gaza?

Did you stop to consider that a war of aggression the likes of which would be necessary to seize the land area comprising the Gaza Strip & West Bank, thus rendering the "now" map valid, would have been front page news for months and yet there's a conspicuous lack of mention of anything along those lines in the news from '96?

And before you go off on a canardly, rambling "that's what 'they' want you to think"-based conspiracy theory tangent, have you stopped to consider the West's demonstratedly blind support for Israel, the public opinion cudgel available to swing relative to Israel's continuous efforts to paint itself as the victim such headlines would afford? Oh, also, there's that pesky little detail of the Oslo Accords inconveniently being ratified in '93.

Ah, but that's not what this is really about, is it? No... this is about the butthurts you're riding from having your attempted "only bad when Jews want one" bullshit narrative slapped down like the weak-sauce straw man it is, innit?

If they were any other demographic I’d still be calling them colonizing savages. Them being Jewish has nothing to do with it.

Yeah I highly doubt that, you’ve also called Jews plague rats.

Yes. If you see the non-cropped version of my post, you’ll notice I made a direct comparison to anti-vaxxers. Because Zionists are completely okay with spreading a whole new wave of polio if it means they get to make their genocidal fantasies a reality.

Again, emphasis on Zionists and not Jews. But I know you’re mentally incapable of engaging anyone in good faith, so I don’t know who I’m covering my bases for here.

So it’s okay that you called Jews plague rats because you also called anti forced vaxxers that too?

You’re the only one making this about Jews.

My guy you can’t openly call for the ethnic cleansing of Jews and say that I’m the one making it about Jews.

Zionists are openly calling for the genocide of Arabs, and I’m calling them out for the monsters that they are. Either you’re one of them, or you’re a useful idiot.

My god you are such a hypocrite, your comment calling for the ethnic cleansing of Jews proves that you are guilty of what you claim the other side to be guilty of.

No, I’ve called anti-vaxxers and covid denialists plague rats. Now I know you’re just putting words in my mouth.

Am I now?

Nope, Zionism literally means a homeland for the Jewish people as promised to them by their maker.

So "Manifest Destiny II: The Gefiltening"?

You don’t seem to have a problem with any other ethnic group wanting a state of their own, why is it only bad when Jews want one?

They Jews had one already as was created in the 1940s so I'm not sure where you're getting this "only bad when Jews want one" nonsense...

-oh, I see... you're trying use a relevant political joke to force a narrative of ethnicity-based bias, change the subject, shift the conversation away from the fact that Israel's been violating international law, engaging in blatant imperialism, committing human rights violations for decades, openly committing war crimes for the last 300+ days, in short, doing the same thing Russia's been doing in Ukraine only on a much longer time-scale.

Each time Israel has expanded their borders is when being attacked by hostile neighbors and in a push back gain territory. Just as it is with the Palestinians today.

Have you considered that them seizing more territory may be the reason they keep getting attacked?

Nope the attacks came first each and every time. The 1947 accords define the original territories. It was the surrounding hostile Arab nations that sort to remove them from the little territory they occupied. Each time losing ground.

You’d be mad too if some foreign government decided that part of your state belonged to them now.

Most of the land ceded to the Jews were desert. Any gain of territories were due to hostile neighbors attacking and losing.

Bullshit, what would an invading occupation want with a bunch of empty desert? I bet you think all those Olive just magically appeared after the Zionists showed up.

It was allotted to them by England whom controlled the region in 47. Look it up.

Just so we're clear, what you're saying is that if Ali attacks his neighbor Yehuda, the logical course of action is to forcibly take their neighbor Kasim's property?

No, according to international law, gaining land from concurring aggressor is common. Restoring ancestral land to their former territories is a plus.

"Concurring aggressor"? Sorry, but wtf are you talking about?

If that was meant to be "conquering aggressor" then yes, gaining land under such conditions is common -and illegal under international law. Also, strictly speaking, the Jews have about the same amount of right to the ancestral lands of Palestine as have the Palestinians.

My bad used the wrong term. Once hamas surrenders unconditional and the hostages released the war in Palestine will end. Since the Palestinian government under the terrorist group Hamas has proved to be hostile and barbaric they will no longer be under self rule. Israel will seize control and parcel out land deeds to others. The southern part of Gaza (boardering Egypt) will be granted to the Palestinians yet it will be under Israel rule. I know this is hard to hear yet this is Israel’s game plan. .

Nah, it's not hard to hear, just depressing. I mean... most world governments recognize that Israel's been illegally occupying the West Bank since the late '60s but they continue to turn a blind eye. And yes, no argument here; it's definitely Israel's game plan as evidenced.