Imgflip Logo Icon

Soyboy Vs Yes Chad

Soyboy Vs Yes Chad | ASK ELIZABETH STRUHS, THE LITTLE GIRL IN AUSTRALIA WHO DIED BECAUSE HER PARENTS AND CHURCH WITHHELD INSULIN AND PRAYED FOR HER INSTEAD; WHAT HARM DOES RELIGION DO? | image tagged in soyboy vs yes chad | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
77 views 1 upvote Made by tekbarrier 1 month ago in atheist
Soyboy Vs Yes Chad memeCaption this Meme
19 Comments
0 ups, 1mo
High Vis. Burka | image tagged in high vis burka | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
This safety cone wants the vitamin D.
0 ups, 4w,
2 replies
LOL now do the 150 million people massacred by atheist states in the 1900s.
0 ups, 2w,
1 reply
"you have said "I don't like what you say, so therefor you haven't done shit. Lalalalala I can't hear you. I don't like facts that make atheists look like communists so I don't accept it." "

You're a liar, plain and simple

"The reason it's a bit more difficult to name atheist massacres before the French revolution us because it's a newer phenomenon. In the last 200 years we have only started seeing g how violent atheists are when they take full power of countries"

Once again, you're conveniently ignoring the fact that all of those instances were cases of communist dictators. There are countries in Europe right now that are overwhelmingly nonreligious, and yet you don't see the non-religious people committing massacres.

You're grasping at straws because you know you can't name a single massacre carried out by atheists before the French revolution

"The reason you can name at least a couple of ones carried out by the religious before the French Revolution..."

It's more than a couple. It's probably in the hundreds.

"is because the only examples of barbarianism carried out by christian-extremists is because they are only from long ago and have disappeared in modernity"

They didn't disappear in modernity. Christians still commit murders and attacks against people they don't like.

"Modernity brought out the best in Christendom"

No, Christians were dragged kicking and screaming into a modern world where slavery and barbarism aren't accepted anymore.

"while it has exposed the true end-goal and nature of atheism"

You clearly don't understand anything about atheism. It has no end goal. Atheism means not believing a God exist, that's it, nothing else. Anything else you try to add onto that part of the definition of the word atheism.
0 ups, 2w,
1 reply
You seem to be delusionally ignoring the fact that every last one of those communist dictatorships were atheist by nature. You ignore it because you don't like it. That is what lying IS!

"You clearly don't understand anything about atheism. It has no end goal. Atheism means not believing a God exist" Isn't it amazing that such a simple belief has led to the worst human rights violations in the history of mankind?

"No, Christians were dragged kicking and screaming into a modern world where slavery and barbarism aren't accepted anymore." You can tell that to all of the great scientists and university-founders of old who were Christians and brought about modernity. They'd love to take the piss at you for such a willfully ignorant, brain rot comment
0 ups, 2w,
1 reply
"You seem to be delusionally ignoring the fact that every last one of those communist dictatorships were atheist by nature"

I already acknowledged that they were atheist, I never denied that. What I'm saying is if they did the bad stuff they did because they were atheist then how come atheists haven't been doing stuff like that for thousands of years?

"Isn't it amazing that such a simple belief has led to the worst human rights violations in the history of mankind?"

I could say the same thing about believing in God. People who believe in God have committed the worst human rights violations in the history of mankind.

"You can tell that to all of the great scientists and university-founders of old who were Christians and brought about modernity"

Except not everybody who helped usher in a better way of looking at the world were Christians. And if we go back to the Enlightenment as the start of that, those people were often nonreligious
0 ups, 2w,
1 reply
"I already acknowledged that they were atheists, I never denied that. What I'm saying is if they did the bad stuff they did because they were atheists then how come atheists haven't been doing stuff like that for thousands of years?"
Probably because atheism hasn't been around for very long and remains one of the smallest minorities of belief in history. There have been relatively few experiments where atheists take full power, but of those experiments, it ended in the most brutal dictatorships in the history of man.

On the reverse side, we've had Christian kingdoms for literally 2000 years, and yeah, there have been bad people in them. Just downright bad guys that needed to face justice, won't deny that. Can't deny that, but the amount of tyrannical dictatorships that Christianity has created is almost non-existent when compared to the atheist ones and in a shorter amount of time.

"I could say the same thing about believing in God. People who believe in God have committed the worst human rights violations in the history of mankind."

I mean that's a relative scale, but to further make my point; you've been having to go back to the Middle Ages to find oppression in the name of Christianity while I just basically have to go back to when my dad was a kid to find examples of atheism stomping on the rights of a country's people.

"Except not everybody who helped usher in a better way of looking at the world were Christians. And if we go back to the Enlightenment at the start of that, those people were often nonreligious"

Vice versa, my propagandist. Not everybody who helped usher in a better way of looking at the world was nonreligious and even fewer atheists. It appears that the minority of golden-age scientists were non-religious/atheist. Whereas the list of the most celebrated thinkers of that exact time that ushered in the age of modern thinking was almost exclusively religious in some way. A LOT of whom were Christian. And that's a fact that doesn't go away just because it frustrates you.
0 ups, 2w
"Probably because atheism hasn't been around for very long and remains one of the smallest minorities of belief in history"

Atheism has been around for thousands of years. It's not some new thing that just started recently. As long as people have told stories about gods, there have been people who didn't believe those stories

"There have been relatively few experiments where atheists take full power, but of those experiments, it ended in the most brutal dictatorships in the history of man"

And yet the only examples you can give are examples where they are also communists.

"On the reverse side, we've had Christian kingdoms for literally 2000 years...but the amount of tyrannical dictatorships that Christianity has created is almost non-existent when compared to the atheist ones and in a shorter amount of time"

If you include European monarchies, then that number goes way up, because Christian kings and queens in Europe, have done horrific things for many hundreds of years. European Christians spent hundreds of years going to other parts of the world and committing barbaric acts of violence and oppression and extermination, much of it in the name of Christianity

"you've been having to go back to the Middle Ages to find oppression in the name of Christianity"

No, it still happens today
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Funny how you leave out what those countries all had in common: they were communist dictatorships.

If atheism is so horrible and violent, name all the massacres done by atheists for the centuries before 1900.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
The Soviet Union, China, Cambodia, Cuba, East Germany, North Korea, Mongolia, Vietnam, & Revolutionary France come to mind.
Better question: why are atheism and communism always in the same building?
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
"The Soviet Union, China, Cambodia, Cuba, East Germany, North Korea, Mongolia, Vietnam, & Revolutionary France come to mind"

I said before 1900. Revolutionary France is the only one on that list which was before 1900.

"Better question: why are atheism and communism always in the same building?"

They aren't. But to the extent that they are, I don't know. So back to my point: If atheism is so horrible and violent, name all the massacres done by atheists for the centuries before 1900.
0 ups, 3w,
2 replies
The examples I gave you are enough to prove a point already including the example I gave before the 1900s.
0 ups, 2w
"you have to go back over 700 years to find barbarianism by bad Christians"

I don't even have to go back 100 years. The KKK is a Christian organization and they are literally a violent terrorist group.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
No they aren't. Besides the French revolution, name all of the massacres carried out by atheists who were NOT communist dictators

I can name lots of massacres carried out by Christians going back hundreds and hundreds of years. Why can't you do that for atheism, since atheists have been around even longer than Christians?
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
LOL "No they aren't" and also "Besides the one you named". You dropped both of those sentences because you can't handle facts that make you uncomfortable or challenge your way of thinking, so you just dismiss them with "nuh-uh."
That's a you problem. Not a me problem. I've already done my job.
0 ups, 2w,
2 replies
" "No they aren't" and also "Besides the one you named"."

Yeah, because you named ONE that was unrelated to communism. I asked you to name more and you can't.

"You dropped both of those sentences because you can't handle facts that make you uncomfortable or challenge your way of thinking"

Unlike religious people, I'm perfectly fine with facts that make me uncomfortable or challenge my way of thinking.

You think atheism is a problem and leads to violence. Of all the examples you gave, all of them except one are directly tied to communist dictators, and the only example you could give before that was the French revolution. Why can't you name a bunch of massacres carried out by atheists between the year 1 and the year 1900?

"That's a you problem. Not a me problem. I've already done my job."

You haven't done shit. You cannot name a single massacre carried out by atheists before the French revolution. I can name many in that same time period carried out by Christians in the name of Christianity, and you know it.
0 ups, 2w
Translating your comment by re.oving all of the I flayed ego, you have said "I don't like what you say, so therefor you haven't done shit. Lalalalala I can't hear you. I don't like facts that make atheists look like communists so I don't accept it."

The reason it's a bit more difficult to name atheist massacres before the French revolution us because it's a newer phenomenon. In the last 200 years we have only started seeing g how violent atheists are when they take full power of countries. The reason you can name at least a couple of ones carried out by the religious before the French revolution is because the only examples of barbarianism carried out by christian-extremists is because they are only from long ago and have disappeared in modernity. Modernity brought out the best in Christendom while it has exposed the true end-goal and nature of atheism.
0 ups, 2w,
1 reply
You literally asked me for one example of an atheist massacre before the 1900s and when I told you, you said "Nuh-uh. you don't know shit. That doesn't count". Then you moved the goalpost and said "Besides that one and all of the dictatorships, name all of them."

You did that because you believe in propaganda. You don't have original thoughts. They were put there by other people and you accept them without question. then when someone like me calls you out on it you get hostile and "lash out". (to be fair, you aren't scary so your version of lasing out is like a toddler stamping her foot). Again, I answered your question, so I've done my job. It's a you problem. Not a me problem.
0 ups, 2w,
1 reply
"You literally asked me for one example of an atheist massacre before the 1900s and when I told you, you said "Nuh-uh. you don't know shit. That doesn't count"."

Once again, you're lying. I never said it doesn't count. I thought the Bible said lying is wrong. How come you do it so often?

"Then you moved the goalpost and said "Besides that one and all of the dictatorships, name all of them." "

None of the communist dictatorships you mentioned were before 1900. By your own admission, you could only think of one example of widespread violence by atheists before 1900, and yet atheists have been around for thousands of years.

"You did that because you believe in propaganda. You don't have original thoughts. They were put there by other people and you accept them without question"

It's hilarious that you say that because you don't know anything about what I believe or how I think. You're thinking of religion that tells people what to believe and they do so without question. Many religions even say that having doubts or disbelief is evil, to try to shame people into not questioning what they're told.

"then when someone like me calls you out on it you get hostile and "lash out"."

You made a bad argument, and I explained why it was a bad argument; that is not lashing out

You say that atheism is evil and dangerous and destructive, and yet you can only give one example of violence by atheists before the rise of communism. That tells me all I need to know.

You never even tried to explain why you think atheism is so dangerous. If you believe a god exists and other people aren't convinced, how does that make them dangerous?
0 ups, 2w
Your exact words: "If atheism is so horrible and violent, name all the massacres done by atheists for the centuries before 1900."
My exact response: "Revolutionary France"
Your response: "I said before 1900. Revolutionary France is the only one on that list which was before 1900."
My response: "The example I gave you is enough to prove a point already."
Your response: "No they aren't. Besides the French Revolution, name all of the massacres carried out by atheists"
Then it spiraled into you basically saying "That doesn't count. Name another one." Brother, I've already given you an answer. You just don't like it because it's relatively recent on the world stage along with the other massacres carried out by atheist dictatorships, while you have to go back over 700 years to find barbarianism by bad Christians.

It comes across to me like the one calling me a liar has a habit of accusing his opponent of that which he is guilty of (ironic given that we talked about Communism and that's one of its primary strategies of agitation). Hope you have a good lawyer and a game-keeper to help you move the goalposts back to where they started.
Soyboy Vs Yes Chad memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
ASK ELIZABETH STRUHS, THE LITTLE GIRL IN AUSTRALIA WHO DIED BECAUSE HER PARENTS AND CHURCH WITHHELD INSULIN AND PRAYED FOR HER INSTEAD; WHAT HARM DOES RELIGION DO?