I don't see why not being sexually attracted to anyone at all should be counted as being LGBTQ+

Wow. How to tell me you don't know the Bible, without saying you don't know the Bible.

The Bible forbids fornication, that is all forms of sexual relations, OUTSIDE of marriage.

Sex is great' we only have five kids, it is a good thing my wife didn't get pregnant every time. The fair skinned population would not be in trouble, and we would be in Gunises Book.

No that’s not true as depending on the sect especially hardline evangelicals, Catholics, and Jehovah’s witnesses they also will argue that sex is only for producing children.

And to have a conservative tell a former witness what is or isn’t in the Bible when most conservatives have never actually read the Bible is hilarious.

As if they followed the word of god as closely as they do they’d be stoning Trump not elevating him to power. Not just for his adultery but for his false claims of being gods chosen. Where as I just want him in prison for treason/jan 6th.

False witnesses and catholicism are religions that claim to be part of Christianity.

When I post, I am citing The Bible, not false dogma.

Again with the "other Christians are not Christians" bullshit, jeez you're obviously still stuck in the 14th century. All this pointless bullshit conflict of Catholics vs protestants vs orthodox acting like each other's religion "isn't true" when it shouldn't badly matter all the Abrhamic religions worship the same god.

Every catholic, witness, orthodox, baptist, methodist, lutheran, and any other person that trusts Christ's shed blood, and nothing else, is saved and child of G-d.

Any organization that does not preach Salvation by grace by through faith is not Christian.

I never comment, up vote, down vote, British, Australian, or Camadian memes, because I have no dog in the fight.

You as an unbeliever have only one choice that matters.

Trust Christ as your personal Saviour and become a child of G-d.

Continue as you are and meet Him on different terms.

Did you just “no true Scotsman” 3 different major sects of Christianity. 🤣

Christianity, is dependent on only one one thing. 100% Salvation, through the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Deny that, add to it or remove from it and you are not a Christian sect, but a false religion. Period. Full Stop.

Calm down there. last time the Christians started fighting each other it got so out of hand the pope sent them into the Middle East so they’d stop killing each other.

Even wrote em pardons for their sins. 🤣

Well there you go, if that is not an example of false religion, I don't know what would be.

If a Church (local) preaches the unadulterated Gospel it right.

Revelation 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

Shared via Bible KJV

I am nondenominational. Denominations are not Biblical.
You are either Saved or lost.
It helps to go to a Bible preaching local Church.
I attended an Independent Baptist Church. It is not part of any Denomination.

Baptists historically have adhered to the Bible in faith and practice.

Your ignorance is evident in your statement below.

There are several denominations that use the name baptist.

What makes them a denomination is that they have a hierarchy, like the catholics, lutherans, persbeterians, and such.

I go to an Independent Baptist Church. It answers to no man, board, or denomination. In turn we tell no other Church how to operate.

We follow the Bible, Christ is our head.

This is my last interaction with you.
You don't know the Bible you have no dog in this fight.

If you seriously want to discuss Salvation contact me.

Is that why you replied to your comment and not mine?
You speak of me being ignorant of “the Bible” except there are currently 5 different versions of the Bible in use not including ones that predate the KJV.

So which one is THE Bible as none of the 5 in use date back to the founding of Christianity and been modified by several authors and scribes.

We’ll woopdie do you arnt apart of the normal hierarchy of the evangelical base your a splinter group and do you honestly think your gonna be able to take on the Catholics, adventists, calvinists, Mormons, and more orthodox churches if they were to get into power?

Perhaps they will label you heretic for not following their established doctrine.

Which is THE ENTIRE POINT OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT.

You claim I know nothing of Christianity yet you know nothing yourself and know nothing about the government you and other Christian’s claw at to dismantle.

Lmfao! Baptism is a denomination of Christianity! Not only that it is apart of evangelistic Christianity!

You just labeled your own church as heretical while claiming it adheres best to the text!

This is exactly why Christian nationalism would eat itself again if allowed to take root as they’d spend non stop slaughtering each other over whose form of Christianity is correct.

Lmfao.😝😆😂🤣

Except that’s a choice on their part.
Ace people it’s part of who they are.

Maybe some nuns and monks are asexual. I've also heard of couples who are asexual and are married and haven't had sex other than the one the time they decided to procreate and have a baby so that again rests my case that asexual have more in common with conservative Christians than the LGBTQ+ community. I've also heard of straight people who identify as "demisexual" which means they only have sex with someone they are in a close relationship with and consider themselves part of the LGBTQ+ which I view as absurd because straight isn't an LGBTQ+ sexual orientation that was condemned by homophobic bigots let alone being straight and having sex with only someone you're in a relationship with. That also makes them having more in common with conservative Christians than the LGBTQ+ community, I mean conservative Christians who wait until marriage to have sex are technically by definition "demisexual" does that mean they should be considered members of the LGBTQ+ community? But then again having sex only with someone you're in a relationship with doesn't necessarily mean waiting until marriage to have sex.

As someone who is hetero demisexual male.
No.

Again becoming celebite for religious reasons is a choice. Being born wanting to not have sex ever is not a choice. They don’t enjoy it or are sometimes even disgusted by the mere idea. That goes down to the most basic ideas behind consent.

And requiring a relationship for demisexuals is a common misconception. It just requires an emotional connection. Ie you need to know them a little more or who they are to have feelings of attraction. Not just appearances.

And while some terminally online people will reject the idea of hetero Demi’s being LGBTQ most are usually welcomed by the communities as one it’s another ally at worst or b it’s someone who needs support for not behaving like other people.

I genuinely had people claim I was trying to be a puritan who wanted love more than sex just so I could get laid more. Despite the fact I’ve never had a one night stand despite receiving offers.because I didn’t want that.

And I am also formerly a Jehovah’s Witness and was disfellowshipped for false claims of adultery with a non witness (my gf at the time.) despite the fact I remained a virgin for 6 years after said dis fellowship.

Personally I found more aid and comfort among the LGBTQ then my fellow hetero males who would be obsessed with getting me to “lay pipe.” So much so I had rumors that I was gay dogging me since middle school because I wasn’t interested in sexual advances or ignore them. I’m not saying you can’t be Christian and LGBTQ that’s usually the Christian’s who do that.

Not to say that my hetero males were wrong if. Was just who they are and just didn’t understand me.