guess I am a genocidal racist...weird.

Pretty sure those kids are not the same age as the individual with the dress on..

8l5w0k.gif (click to show)

"It takes a nice dress and a set of balls to bring these children an edu'gay'tion these days!"

I don't judge people for their "turn-ons" (and you'd be surprised at what turns some people on) as long as they are not harmful and *between consenting ADULTs*. (Or solo.)

I have seen it all ... and like you say, it has nothing to do with me and its none of my business as long as it is between adults. Once people want to start dragging kids into the picture.. I can't help but to take it personally because I have 3 of my own.

So adults can’t read to kids anymore? Better cancel all Kindergarten classes then

Now you know the problem is in the material and the individual presenting it. A dragqueen is an adult entertainer, having one read pro trans agenda to preschoolers is completely inappropriate. Just a day or 2 ago you agreed with me on this.

Okay, that was admittedly a bad faith argument, but I still think I may have a point. I agree that children should not be presented adult material. But I see no adult material in that image. Just a picture book, a person in heavy makeup and a dress, and kids

Drag is not inherently sexual. It usually is, sure, but not in these cases. That’d be like saying film is inherently sexual because many movies contain nudity. Sure, kids shouldn’t be seeing those movies, but that doesn’t mean they should be banned from seeing all movies

Right, but they should be banned from seeing the movies with nudity. There are movies designed for children, because there are things like sexual situations and nudity that preschoolers should not see in others. The book being read is an intro into trans identity, which is inappropriate for a drag queen to be reading to kids this young.

I tend to wonder why people like that want an audience of children.

I think “banned” is a bit strong, but I 100% agree with the sentiment for restricting access to said movies.

But let’s talk about the original meme here. What do you mean by “bedroom antics”? I agree with the statement by itself, but paired with the rest of the meme it seems specifically charged towards trans people living their identity in public, around kids at that. There’s a difference between trans people and AGP people, that being how AGP see it in a sexual way while trans people don’t . What I mean is, if a man or drag queen is wearing a dress in public because it turns him on, then yes, keep it away from kids. If a trans woman or drag queen wears a dress because it makes them happy, but not in a sexual way, then that’s okay.

"Bed room antics" meaning anything adult should be for 18 and over. finding out whether or not a drag queen gets turned on or gets happy from wearing a dress is an impossible task, wouldn't it just be better to seperate drag queens from children? I am not saying eliminate or ban drag.. but just stay away from kids.. This is not a difficult moral issue.