Blook's temp

Burn them at the stake like the witches they are

Good

Wtf Blook?! No!!! Animals can’t consent and it's bad for them emotionally and often physically. The only animals that allow it to happen are often trained in a highly manipulated and abusive way to allow it to happen or else. And some animals are unfortunately natually more trainable and loyal to their owners despite any abuse…. None of it is ok.

Facts bro

Good

F**k no

Good

No!

Good

Hell no

Good

Hell 2 Da Naw

Zoophillia should be illegal but furries should be allowed

Fax bro

💯

The fax to the machine to the no printer

Fax fax fax fax fax

Absolutely not

Absolutely not. Zoophiles are f**king awful.

No you spoon

Good

i feel like people saying no because it is easyer to be in the majority.
they are people and they should be respected
but their actions... thats a different story.

good luck proving this to whoever it is

This has nothing to do with wanting to be part of the majority. In the 60s and 70s animal p and CP was legal in quite a few places in the world… It led to quite a lot of animal and child abuse. There were animals that could be basically rented out for that specific purpose and parents who put their kids in explicit videos & dirty magazines for some cash. Even in the usa, while it was illegal to make it, it wasn't illegal to buy it for awhile… thankfully in 1977 it was made illegal. We should never be lenient to zoophiphiles or maps to protect the world from becoming like this again.

when i meant down at the base i meant down here. or up... wherever. its good to see we are on the same side here.

yeah... i dont care... i know its illigal and it has happend in the past. im not not trying to be part of the majority. im am part of the majority. this is why i said their actions are a differnt story. so get off my case.

I'm not on your case, this is the part I was responding to. “i feel like people saying no because it is easyer to be in the majority.”

and...

And what? That's it. I'm saying people responding are part of the majority because zoophilia is wrong and are NOT just part of the majority because it's easier.

im not saying people do it because its easyer. it because its what they think is right. not being in the majority has public immage dirted on.

But we're already used to not being in the majority as lgbtq people… so even if our thought about it being wrong was part of a minority, I still believe many people here would continue to say that zoophilia is wrong. Not everything is about image.

sure wemight be minority in total populus. but the thought is in majority here is it not? also is it not in majority most everywhere. yes people would say zoophilia is wrong because we all think we are right. who said eveything was abount immage? i certainly didnt

why must i be the devils advocate?

I don't care if you are a straight guy or not. Being straight or cis has less struggles when it comes to embracing who you really are (again ignoring other minority factors like race or religion that might give a person more struggles to face). It's easier for them to be who they are without a lot of the pushback that the lgbtq faces.

Everything is a term… every single word and term is made up but it's done so with the intention of getting across needs, wants, and ideas. The term lgbtq is as valid as the word cup or car or any other word you can think of. Feelings has nothing to do with it. It's just an established term and if you fit the definition then you’re part of it. It's no more special than having brown hair, it's just part of who you are. The reason it's a big deal at all is because of the struggle we have to face.

was a straight guy. but how would you know this. why might someone in lgnt have less strugle? oh right that what i was doing. going to look up capitain jack sparow intresting.

also its more space efficent to reply down at the base of the converce. also i tryed the part of who i am bit ddnt work out for me. i inconsistant. witch makes me a dirty lier. well ill see you around.

its funny how i struggle less when i find that in not straight.

“not being in the majority has public immage dirted on.” unless I'm misunderstanding, in this part right here you said how it's important to be in a majority unless you potentially want your public reputation to be damaged and that there's an importance in having conformity with others.

In my view, in a way, the lgbtq is punk rock. We are proudly our own thing and do our own thing. F conforming to what the world wants, we strive to live life the way we want as who we really are even if others see us not aligning as the gender that goes along with the sex we were pronounced at birth or us dating the same sex as wrong.

In that spirit, who cares if people saying zoophilia is wrong are part of the majority of the minority? It's everyone's opinion here that it is wrong because that is what we actually think/feel, not because it is popular to think it's wrong.

im sorry i have been awake for a while. so things may not be as clear. plus i find it is easyer to have clarity whilst in person. intelegence come with the time between replys.
*whispers to self: ok lets actualy read it*

i was talking abount how it is hard to be in the: "non majority" not how easy it is to be in the majority. one can be shamed and shunned for just thinking different. having that happen can scar one with trama mkin social interactions dificult for several years later for the subconsious fear of messing up again.

counter point: why is it only lgbtq that can express themselfs? who to say that cis hets dont strive to be themselfs? and whos to say that they are not shamed and shunned for driving to be themself? and who says that all of them hate and dispise the lgbtq community?

*reads last bit* ever read the 12 angery men? no? well its abount 12 guys (funnly enough) who are on a jury deciding if a kid murdered his father or not. and the main point of the book/play is that the majority isnt already right, and that uncertanty is more than fine.

so what im saying is that im certainly not thinking that the majority is always right. as the devils advocate i challange authority and always lawer for the opposed side.
man, its easy to base things off ones self

“ its more space efficent to reply down at the base of the converce.” It's impossible for me to reply to your last comment. You can only make a comment chain of replies in imgflip to a certain length. To get around that, I’m replying to your last comment where I'm physically able to reply.

I’m done talking to you for the night/morning. I have other stuff I’m supposed to do. If you feel like you struggle less, it goes against what is historically and statistically true, but good for you.

“Not being part of the majority is hard” and “being in the majority is easy” are saying the exact same thing just phrased differently.

Being lgbtq takes a lot more guts than being straight does. Nobody is giving people a bunch of fight back for being straight. Being straight is the expected norm. They don't have as many obstacles when it comes to being themselves (ignoring any race and religion minority factors that could be present). They don't have to fight to be themselves. Historically and even today it's harder to truly be yourself as an lgbtq person than it is to be yourself as a straight cis person.

I'm familiar with 12 angry men. It was mandatory for a psychology class. I don't see how it's relevant in this conversation.

some people you just cant convince.

let me type this fast because im tierd.
no major is not easy, but major is not hard. major is stating your mind.

let me ask you this. did it ever occur to you that i was that straight guy i was talking abount who was shunned for being different? did it not occur to you that i drop hints and clues that trickle into my everyday? before i argue with people i ligit tell how my mind works so they can brutaly out manuver me but they never do?

mental structure is shunned in our everyday.
..what is lgbt but a term to make our little heads fill with dopamine. to know that there is someone elce who is like us.
that must be special...

i will not respect these subhuman assholes

you do whatever. they are still people. i dont aprisiate their actions

F**K NO, IF I SEE A ZOOPHILE NEAR MY CATS, I'M GOING TO BE BE BRINGING BACK SCAPHISM

btw the scaphism part is a joke, but I will shove a jar of angry wasps down their throat ☺

Why the f**k would they

I wanna know if yall would back me up against a "pRoUD zOoSeXUaL"

Is there anyone specific you’re talking about or just zoophiles in general?

yeah someone on twi- x

Definitely would