Furry cringe:

Diddling Pokemon, I do not condone, or support. It's basically beastiality. Do not get started with the Vaperon bullshit. Pokemon Feral p*rn should not exist, as it is a grave sin.

Based and true

LMAO

"We don't condone irl bestiality but we find the idea of it conceptually hot"- Furries

I hate how true that is.

Thats how furries are

Horny, narcissistic, degenerate, attention seeking and cultist

Pretty much

"We dont condone irl beastiality but we find the idea of it conceptually hot"- furries

I love the phrasing on that.

Thanks

Agreed

Yes

ESV And you shall not lie with any animal and so make yourself unclean with it, neither shall any woman give herself to an animal to lie with it: it is perversion. NIV 'Do not have sexual relations with an animal and defile yourself with it.

Yes,all true

what does diddling mean

(no actually looking it up rn)

(It means mating)

ah

Leviticus 20:15

Those who question this shall be smited down in the name of god

They’ll call everyone who disagrees with them Nazis

You know what I changed my mind about the flag. You are right, wee are not gonna change it just because furries get offended by it. Doing so is an act of submission to the enemy. We shall not change our flag just because SJWs and furries get offended by it. As such we will keep using the OG anti furry flag.

I don't consider that option helpful long-term, but do what you wish
I won't stop you

Like every SJW does

Oh damn, new flag?

Not anymore. An anti furry made this flag in response to furrie accusing antis of n&zism. But after realizing that there is no reason to change it, and that furries whining about it is cringe, I decided we will still use the og flag.

I don't think the flag was the only reason for that accusation...

Def not. The other reasons sre just as BS as the flag. People will accuse you of n&zism over everything this days. Specially oversensitive furries.

I mean the Antis who are just as insensitive as gjyg is oversensitive when it comes to his "jokes".

Yeah, but thats not proof of "n&zism"

Of course not.