Sure - healthcare is a perfect example of this. In our system (with the exception of the VA), healthcare is a combination of products and services sold by corporations, which means our prices are a combination of fixed costs (supplies, labor), corporate profits, network and volume discounts, and payments from patients.
During the 90s and 2000s when boomers became middle aged and started needing things like statins and viagra, costs started shooting up, and insurance companies rolled out "pre-existing conditions" as a means of reducing payouts. That of course led to fewer Americans being insured, caused the amount of medical debt held by Americans to skyrocket, and led many to seek care in emergency rooms far later than they otherwise would have, both of which have huge implications on the cost of care.
The Republican solution to this problem since the early 70s when Nixon signed HMOs into existence is the same - save money on care by providing less of it while protecting corporate profits.
The Democratic solution was different in that it realized "less care" isn't a reasonable solution given the Hippocratic Oath, and that we'll end up footing the bill either way - so they passed ACA which made care more accessible, reduced costs, and did so while not just protecting, but expanding corporate profits.
Pretty much any disagreement between the parties is the same - we want to budget for these things, you want to pretend they don't exist but don't actually want to spend any less - that's why deficits explode when Republicans are in power.