Homelessness? It's the Drugs!

Expand on that.

The original economists ("laissez faire," etc) were saying land is different. If the king owns the land, he owns the people's labor. But if all taxes were abolished except on land ownership, everyone would pay the same rate for land (the same RATE (not price) because some land is more valuable, of course), but we would all be tax free.

But rich people don't want to do their own chores, so they need society to stay poor. And easy to control. So, we are lied to about how simple economics really is in order to treat us like cattle.

We don’t have a king.
Go get some land.
I think I’ve told you this before.
BTW…your last paragraph is total bullshit.
As is your first paragraph.

Having no king does not give people equal access to land (life), only to land price investment.

Clearly you don’t know what you’re babbling on about

Anybody tried to afford medication for a rare desease... We're talking 14k a month for one drug, after bankruptcy and spending every dollar untill social services kicks in the only option is homeless, that doesn't even cover living expenses after services kick in because nobody can live on 1 k a month.