They admitted they had no evidence in court!

True The Vote admitted in court that they had no evidence. Were they lying about that? That would be perjury. Dinesh D'Souza has lost all credibility.

More lib propaganda media lies...

"they just busted a ballot stuffer who was working as a fed informant"
Proof?

https://www.ajc.com/opinion/columnists/opinion-election-deniers-murky-balderdash-comes-clear-under-oath/3E35KLIILNALBCY2UJQ2OVHKBU/

True the Vote said in a recent court filing that it doesn’t know the identity of its own anonymous source who told a story of a “ballot trafficking” scheme allegedly organized by a network of unnamed groups paying $10 per ballot delivered.

True the Vote also told the court it doesn’t have documents about illegal ballot collection, the name of its purported informant or confidentiality agreements it previously said existed. The records were subpoenaed by the State Election Board in 2022

Georgia election officials and voters are left to wonder whether True the Vote and “2000 Mules” told the truth — or if they were drumming up outrage based on vague suspicions and an unnamed whistleblower, fueling suspicions about Democrat Joe Biden’s win over Republican Donald Trump.

https://www.ajc.com/politics/true-the-vote-tells-court-it-has-no-records-to-back-up-fraud-claims/77FJUQMWBZFYHEYVF6M54BUBDQ/?s=04

A recently busted "ballot stuffer" "working as a fed informant" is irrelevant, doesn't change the fact that True The Vote claimed possession of evidence of a crime, was ordered by a judge to produce said evidence and subsequently failed to do so. In legal terms, that places the claimant in the position of criminally liable accessory after the fact --if they're not lying. And if they are lying, -the upshot of this matter- as TTV is a Texas-based organization, its operational contact across state lines with Brad Raffensperger to facilitate conveyance of false information intended to undermine the electoral process likely was facilitated via the web or other means of telecommunication -which would place TTV in legal jeopardy under multiple federal laws (perpetration of hoax, use of telecommunications to facilitate hoax, commission of hoax across state lines, election interference, hampering GA government employee in the execution of duties, etc.).

As for your alleged ballot-stuffing federal informant, I'm interested -please cite your source as I'd like to peruse that information for myself rather than rely on a second-hand accounting.

Yes... you don't know who can put names to their evidence... the evidence that they provided to the FBI and GBI... they provided proof... the authorities refused to unmask it... Gee... I wonder why...

"Yes..."

Yes, what? Yes, TTV is accessory after the fact? Yes, TTV committed interstate hoaxery?

"you don't know who can put names to their evidence..."

Nor do you. What I do know is that TTV was ordered to produce for the court the evidence it claimed to possess. It didn't.

"they provided to the FBI and GBI... they provided proof... the authorities refused to unmask it..."

Let's say that's an accurate statement -there's nothing preventing TTV from publicly dumping its alleged evidence on the media. No doubt a plethora of rightwing outlets would be thrilled to publish it in its entirity, full-page, unredacted. Considering TTV is staring into the maw of criminal liability for either accessory after the fact re: election fraud or perpetration of a hoax re: election fraud, it would be in TTV's own interests to go public. And yet they didn't do that.

"Gee... I wonder why..."

https://www.nydailynews.com/2024/02/15/true-the-vote-2000-mules-no-evidence-debunked/

Even Kelce knows it.

Nope... that just proves how stupid Kelce is...

https://truethevote.org/news/true-the-vote-responds-to-fake-news-attacks

Your "source" is True The Vote? 😆
Next you'll be telling us the unknown informer was Ray Epps.

Yes... they responded to the bogus lib media lies... 😆😆

“Mr. Niesse -

The claim that there is insufficient support for True the Vote’s allegation of widespread abuse of then-nascent ballot drop box voting during the 2020 General Election stems from a fundamental misunderstanding amongst members of the media.

The evidence True the Vote made available to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation shortly after the 2020 General Election cannot be understood to be like records stored somewhere. It consisted of massive quantities of electronic data that could only be appreciated and understood when you had multiple servers processing it and visually displaying how the information intersected in real-time. This is called geospatial analysis.

True the Vote provided this information to the FBI, which rendered it available to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation at the time. The GBI consequently has ready access to the summaries and underlying data, and could reconstruct it, but it declines to do that. It is in that sense that there is nothing more for True the Vote to provide that it has not already provided to the GBI.”

In addition to what was originally provided to the FBI and GBI in 2021, we provided three written complaints, with documentation, to the Secretary of State, and over 6,000 documents to the SEB.

The state was unwilling to provide whistleblower protection in 2021, unwillingly to examine our data while it was still set up in active databases, and unwilling to act on the summary data which it could easily have done. Now, three years later, after the statute of limitations has expired on any election crimes, its apparent that the SEB’s interest is not in investigating. Rather, it is in silencing citizens from speaking out, lest they get the same treatment our group is now enduring. It is outrageous.

Mind you, at any point in this odyssey, the GBI could have gotten an administrative warrant to have the summarized cell phone data deanonymized and begin their investigation. There is nothing stopping them from taking that action even now. They have all the information they need. We are not law enforcement. It is up to them to do their jobs. As civilians, we cannot do more than what we have done.

We stand by everything we have ever said about our work product and ballot trafficking in Georgia. We reached out to the Georgia Governor, AG, GBI, Sec of State, and SEB in good faith. Time and again, they have shirked their responsibilities and broken their promises. This is their failure. And the orchestrated attack against us is just one more effort to cover up the truth of Georgia’s failed election processes.

*** It is also important to understand that in the geospatial analysis of cell phone data, researchers are working with unique device identifiers, typically International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI), not cellphone numbers or personal information. When True the Vote was asked for name and contact information of the 242 identified devices, the SEB knew that was not the type of information we had. The device identifiers we do have had been provided to the GBI in 2021. That information has never changed. Only law enforcement can deanonymize this data. They have the authority to do so. Civilians do not.

For more information, please see the timeline, videos, and documents posted at open.ink/collections/georgia

UncoverDC: Ballot Trafficking: Georgia’s Election Board Subpoenas True The Vote

UncoverDC: True The Vote has RICO Ballot Trafficking Evidence: Americans Should Care

UnCoverDC: 2000 Mules and True The Vote Debunk AP Hit Piece

Word salad mumbo-jumbo.

Doubtful even they can.

Yes... I see your point of view... uninformed

"*** It is also important to understand that in the geospatial analysis of cell phone data, researchers are working with unique device identifiers, typically International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI), not cellphone numbers or personal information. When True the Vote was asked for name and contact information of the 242 identified devices, the SEB knew that was not the type of information we had. The device identifiers we do have had been provided to the GBI in 2021. That information has never changed. Only law enforcement can deanonymize this data. They have the authority to do so. Civilians do not."

You do understand that you effectively just stated TTV was spitballing, had no way of knowing what information it had, was operating blind on pure speculation in contravention of its claimed possession of proof of voter fraud, correct?

Btw, you might want to take a moment to read through open.ink's terms; said organization was apparently rather focused on protecting itself from pontential civil liability incurred by their content being quoted under fair-use when its TOS was being constructed.

"Gee... I wonder why..."