Imgflip Logo Icon

smiling black guy in suit

smiling black guy in suit | If the furry NSFW art is based off of animals. Doesn't that make NSFW furry art Zoophilia? | image tagged in smiling black guy in suit | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
245 views 7 upvotes Made by F-35B_Lightning_II 9 months ago in anti-furr_vs_furr
smiling black guy in suit memeCaption this Meme
65 Comments
[deleted]
1 up, 9mo,
3 replies
It would, but most of them are pinheads, so they have no idea. Like gj, he says thet senses humans are technically animals, so sexualizing them is ok. Any person with at least a single braincell remaining know that nsfw furry art is zoophilia. Thats just common sense.
2 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Change My Mind Meme | Nsfw in general is bad | image tagged in memes,change my mind | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
[deleted]
2 ups, 9mo
i really cant. that's a straight fact. also, i have to wait 2 mins to comment for some reason.
0 ups, 9mo,
2 replies
If they really think that humans are animals they should see if they are biologically compatible with a horse and watch their pelvises get destroyed.
[deleted]
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
But the poor horse has to get f**ked by a zoophile! Instead, elephant. They will die.
0 ups, 9mo
Yeah
0 ups, 9mo
What in the Secured Contained Protected | F%CK | image tagged in what in the secured contained protected | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
0 ups, 9mo
Man I agree with you on several of that but repeating it like that over and over will result in the furries becoming more unwilling to change, attack us and use bad faith arguments to justify their actions. So I siggest you delete the comment and put this topic to rest for now to avoid drama.
1 up, 9mo,
2 replies
I- Holup, you actually got a point there- but none of us are zoophiles, and we don’t draw nsfw
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
"None of us are zoophiles."
Now this looks like an argument for me.

Sociology of Furry Fandom (Rust, J. D., 2001) 2% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.

Furry Sociological Survey (Evans, K., 2008) 17% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.

2008 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2008) 18.4% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.

2009 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2009) 13.9% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.

2010 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2010) 13.6% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.

2011 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2011) 13.3% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.

2012 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2012) 14.9% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.

2019 Studies (Roberts, S., et al., 2019) 6.9% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.

Male Furries (Hsu, K., Bailey, J. M., 2019) 46.7% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.

What Are Furries? (fek, 2020) 14.3% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.

Comparing Percentages

Fourteen point nine percent. That's every 1 in 7 roughly.

Here are some points of note based on proven percentiles to compare the likelihood of being or becoming a zoophile to common other statistics.

You are 15 times more likely to be a zoophile if you are a furry than you are to die in a car crash.
https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/all-injuries/preventable-death-overview/odds-of-dying/

You are 14 times more likely to be a zoophile if you are a furry than you are to die in any gun incident, this includes; suicide via firearm, firearm assaults, and accidental discharges.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/04/26/what-the-data-says-about-gun-deaths-in-the-u-s/

You are 3.5 times more likely to be a zoophile if you are a furry than you are to acquire a million dollars in your entire lifetime.
https://balancingeverything.com/chances-of-becoming-a-millionaire/

An equal statistic to 1 out of 7 furries being or becoming a zoophile is the 1 in 7 chance of any person developing incurable cancer.
You have the same chance of being or becoming a zoophile if you are a furry, then you are dying from incurable cancer.
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/understanding-cancer-risk/lifetime-probability-of-developing-or-dying-from-cancer.html
0 ups, 8mo
Mint got destroyed 💀
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
If you ae not one of them then thats fine. However remember that there are many furries who are like this and we are trying to fight them off the clean the furry fandom from its toxic and pervert side.
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
That’s what we’re tryna do right now so I wanna help
0 ups, 9mo
If you wanna help you can ally yourself with the anti furries and help them in their cause.
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
You realize that repeating it in memes will result in the furries attacking us and fighting back right?? This subject is very controversial so to avoid drama and fights we nedd to lay low, so please delete the meme.
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Blud wrong stream
0 ups, 9mo
Am just saying to protect the cause.
Also no wrong stream, this stream allows furry and anti furry discourse so my point is on topic (though i dislike it because it causes drama and discourse)
0 ups, 9mo
I agree however this subject is very sensitive and talking about it openly will result in furries attacking us. So i suggest you delete this meme to avoid drama.
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
I support this meme but to avoid drama please delete it. If we keep repeating it the furries will fight back and attack us.
2 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Attack us all they want, it just proves that they're snowflakes
0 ups, 9mo
I know. But remember that unfortunately they outnumber us and that they have a lot of non furry allies aswell. So tackling a controversial subject of the fandom like this will result in them constantly attacking us more and refusing the change. I support the cause but right now when dealing with controversial subjects we have to lay low.
0 ups, 9mo,
3 replies
Em, aktualy, it's based of furry's OC, which may have animal traits but are mostly humanoid, so no 🤓☝️
2 ups, 9mo,
2 replies
It doesn't matter if it is mostly humanoid. If it is not a human, furries are fantasizing having sex with another spieces. Making yiff zoophilia.
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
Besides, a furry is an animal with human traits, as I said before, and you seem to be saying (I'm saying it in an easier way to understand)
0 ups, 9mo,
5 replies
That's nearly it, but with a slight twist :
Furry are human with animal traits. And sometimes even other things.

There's very ofter in a furry OC the structure of a normal human : bipedal, front eyes, big head and the back bone that I forgor the name.

If we want to talk about NSFW, you notice quickly that the exaggerated part as really common as human NSFW. Indeed, the animals kingdom has all sort of traits that are considered in the species attractive, yet the NSFW artists stick to the human ones (else there'd be no hormones).
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
If furries don't even identify as a human we won't treat it like a human, we'll throw it into the wild with the rest of the animals. See how fast they come crawling back (or just dead)
1 up, 9mo
I don't think the identify as animals...
From my experience at least, the point is pretty clear (head from furries themselves)
1 up, 9mo,
2 replies
Please forgive my friend Jacob, lets say he can sometimes be a little rough when dealing with controversial subjects about the fandom.
1 up, 9mo
Np I'm not offended, everyone can give his opinions
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
And I'm quite used to it at this point. Not like it never happened to me to burst like that
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Its ok, btw memechat???
1 up, 9mo
I was trying to tell him that, but nsfw is bad anyways plus it just gives the fandom a bad reputation
0 ups, 9mo,
3 replies
1)No, furries are in fact animals. They just happened to posses human traits but are neverthless animals.

2)The levels of anthropomorphism in a character varies amongst characters. But in the end they are still animals.

3)That is true in certain artworks but in other they lewdify the animal parts (snouts, paws, ears, fur, feathers, etc.) and this type of artworks are quite common. And if they just happened to like the human-like body proportions that would be understandable but the isssue is that many furries get aroused by the fact that their animals or the animalistic traits, which is why they never watch human NSFW and/or fetishize the animal body parts, most commonly paws. And that itself is concerning.
1 up, 9mo
1) If they are not humans, why do they live like humans? If they don't want to be a human, why don't we respect their rights, and treat them like it! Throw them out into the wild. I give them max 2 days before they die/come crawling back.

2) Once again, if they are animals, we need to treat them like it. I'm just respecting their rights man lmao.

3) Exactly, it's zoophilia.
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
Huh.
I wanna fact-check your saying but I kinda don't want to at the same time.
But it's not really how I imagined furries, and it's a way worse vision than I even thought.
I'll keep that in mine tho, and time will show me the truth.

I find sad that a cool concept like that can be turned into that. But humans are humans...
0 ups, 9mo
Yup, unfortunately

Btw lets memechat. There we can talk more:
imgflip.com/memechat?invite=m1mvMZ8wbJi5IC_hrTfC1m03ifXHU2IH
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
So wouldn't that mean vaporeon in some cases? And Anti furries claim to hunt them
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
Shiny hunt or ...?
0 ups, 9mo
You know what I mean.....
[deleted]
0 ups, 9mo,
2 replies
1 up, 9mo
Hey no need to be rude. I dont agree with him either but my response was more respectfull and with good faith. If you disagree with someone you need to be less rude, specially if the person can be reasoned with.
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
*It's an antro (not the roblox one), or more commonly named, a furry.
Or even for some like me a gootraxian
0 ups, 9mo,
2 replies
Out of all examples you could have used gootraxians are the worst examples. Gootraxians are not seccualized, they are simply gooey slime creatures, their not anthropomorphic. In fact one of them, the slime pups, are quadrupeds: https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/kaiju-paradise-and-the-final-experiment/images/d/d2/Limepup_v31r.png/revision/latest?cb=20231015200055

Also using a roblox game is also not a good example.
1 up, 9mo
I mean true tho, I thought I was the only one with the ref TwT
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
So with the exception of the slime pups, gootraxians are just bipedal slime animals.
0 ups, 9mo,
2 replies
YO YOU KNOW KP ?
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Actually I wish I handt because I dislike that game. But whatever
1 up, 9mo
Oof
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Yes
0 ups, 9mo
0 ups, 9mo,
2 replies
It's not that it's mostly humanoid, it's based on a human, and then they add animals traits for fun.
You can especially see in the NSFW arts that the big exaggerated traits is curves, chest or... other human traits. Kinda like generic NSFW art.

Anyway, f*ck porn, let ban this from the Internet.
3 ups, 9mo
I disagree and say that it is zoophilia.

However, I agree with you
0 ups, 9mo
Btw when are we gonna memechat???
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
They are still animals, and if they are attracted to the fact that their animals or their animalistic traits that makes it even worse.
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
The 2nd part I agree
0 ups, 9mo
Me too. Thats my main issue with furry NSFW. Like if people where attracted to the sexualized human-like body proportions of a character like Space Jam version Lola Bunny that would be understandable (still gross though). But when people get aroused by the fact that its an animal or fetishize its animal body parts thats where i cross the line. And sadly the latter practices have become very common and normalized amongst the fandom.
0 ups, 9mo,
2 replies
(Please do not bomb me with furry NSFW as my supply of eye bleach is currently empty)
2 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Um akshually, according to my calculations, even though they may have human traits, like walking and talking and standing, it is meant animal with human traits, so it is still an animal, making the art zoophilic 🤓☝
2 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
0 ups, 9mo
I agree with the meme, however this subject is very sensitive and talking about it openly will result in furries attacking us. So i suggest you delete this meme to avoid drama. The topic is controversial and furries can use it to attack us so we need to lay low for now.
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Then dont defend it.
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
I just wanted to clarify my opinion, even if no one really asked.
But ig that's what we're here for...
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Ok I know that

But just to clarify things my issue with furry nsfw defenders is not that they defend it, but that their arguments are bad and repetitive.
0 ups, 9mo
I mean, true. It's all hormones at the end that just take a chuck of your night for not much
smiling black guy in suit memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
If the furry NSFW art is based off of animals. Doesn't that make NSFW furry art Zoophilia?