Excellent question.

Libs get their jollies by doing so.

Why is it considered "butchery" and "cannibalism" when I cut out someone's internal organs but not when a surgeon does it? Checkmate libs.

Pretty sure a surgeon doesn't "eat " the parts they cut out.. ffs

I mean it’s just important for kids to learn about that stuff

One is intentionally making a person uncomfortable and the other is educating children on an incredibly important topic.

A mature mind is less tolerant as well as less likely to be groomed as opposed to a tolerant, trusting immature mind.

Exactly, Sex ed helps to prevent children from being groomed by letting them know what they're trying to do and why it is bad.

809f0o.gif (click to show)
Lol

Huh?

That's the libtard perspective on sexual orientation and gender ideology bieng taught to children in classrooms.

Is it really? What’s your source?

7xxc3u.gif (click to show)
You're asking me for a source on sexual orientation and gender ideology embedded in the education system and reinforced by liberal policy makers all over the western hemisphere?
Would you prefer I start from my ridiculous country of Canada or should we start in the U.S or the U.K?
This is news to you, where are from...if you don't mind me asking?

Start from wherever. You also talk as if it is a bad thing, so you can also explain why you believe so while you’re at it

80fbqa.gif (click to show)
First things first...let's get you and the rest of the modern day liberal cult up to speed.

It's alot to take in...we'll go slow ok?

*a lot
We’re off to a great start

Transgenderism was never part of sex ed. Neither was oral or anal sex, sex ed taught about the functions of the kids body and natural changes that occur during puberty.

Sex ed is way different than talking about your sex life.

You're the one comparing them.

actually

It has been so long since I've seen this much overt homophobia and transphobia in this stream

disagreeing with little kids being taught about anal sex is now some kind of "phobia"? Let me guess , in 10 years if you disagree with having sex with a little kid, you'll call it pedophobia , right?

You never mentioned anything about anal sex, you're just shoehorning it into the topic (and acting like you didn't just say that gay people talking about their relationships is grooming) to make yourself look better.
And then you say that me calling you homophobic and transphobic for blatantly saying that teaching kids about gay and trans people is grooming is somehow me supporting pedophilia lol

You are supporting it, because you want to enforce some twisted idea of gender into normal kids minds before they have the chance to develope and create their sexual identity. That is the definition of sexually grooming kids.

Wait now you're saying that teaching kids what genders are is pedophilia? Is this even about LGBTQ+ anymore? I am so confused.

This stream was never about -lgb whatever - it is and always was about what is appropriate for kids to be taught. If you are teaching a little kid about gay sex then guess what, you are grooming them . Cope.

Okay, and?

Nah that's not exactly how it's going down. These schools are literally teaching kids about blow jobs and anal sex.

Any one that is okay with strangers teaching prepubescent children about anal and oral sex are supportive of pedophilia , its the only explanation.

Every time I’ve ever seen someone defend sex ed for kids, they end up getting caught for pedophilia. Every. Single. Time. Wanting to teach kids sex ed is a red flag for pedophilia

Don't confuse sex ed with transgendered progressive agendas, learning about natural body functions is fine because it is normal and kids need to understand what is going on with their body. Like I told that other user, I had sex ed in 6th grade and it went over differences in boys and girls , body changes and functions, hygiene, and that was the extent, it didn't include anal sex or blow jobs or homosexual shit like what they push on kids now.

I mean the explicit “”how to have sex” ed stuff. Learning how reproductive organs and hormones work, that’s alright. But learning how to have sex before you’re even at 10th grade, that’s just morally wrong. Some progressives are trying to push this into elementary schools now.

Those things are part of sexual activity, right? Seems like a perfectly reasonable thing to learn about in a sex ed class.

What is the very important topic?

Sexual education

That is not the point being made.

The point is if your parents had the same conversations at work as "teachers" are having with other people's kids at school, your parents would be fired for sexual harassment due to what would be deemed inappropriate language.

By extrapolation, the teacher is sexually harassing the students.

And as an adult, sexually harassing a child is the equivalent of grooming, predatorial, pedophilic behavior.

The OP may correct me if my read on the meaning is errant.

It's almost as if the children need to be educated on the topic so they can be safe when they're older...

No

It is not.

teaching a little kid about transgenderism is "incredibly important"?, I think basic reading, writing and arithmetic takes precedent over liberal B.S.

Yes, teaching kids about something that could be relevant to their life is important, and if the child is cis then the child knows to respect the people they aren't.
And don't act like I was only talking about teaching kids about trans people, I was talking about sex ed, which has a lot of other subtopics that are *much* more important.

You framing the fact that that transgender people exist as "liberal B.S." was such an easy way to let me know that you are biased on this topic and comparing sex ed to topics usually taught much earlier than sex ed is hilariously dishonest.

I had sex ed in 6th grade. 6th graders do not need to know about anal sex or blow jobs from strangers. Normal body functions like erections and mentral cycles, and physical differences between boys and girls are important. Not transgendered agenda or homosexual sex acts. trying to intertwine lgbtq progressive ideaology with sex ed is dishonest.

People have done fine throughout the eons without sex education.

It wasn't called sex ed at my school, we had health class.

They didn't tell you about boners, periods, or anything "alternative".

They spoke about teen pregnancy, STD's, and how to avoid both.

I have no issue with health class teaching kids about to enter puberty, about what is going to happen with their body, girls more than boys even because I heard a few stories about uneducated young females experiencing a menstrual cycle for the first time and freaking out because they were not informed on what is happening to them. STDs, pregnancy, and Hygiene should also be taught in health class, practical information that kids can use as they enter a new phase in their lives.

I am not advocating against some degree of what you state.

But there is no reason at all to venture into the mechanics of either heterosexual or homosexual intercourse and associated variants.

Plenty of people who were never given school instruction regarding sexual acts have figured them out.

Source (for any libs reading this): Eons of human sexuality and reproduction.

Of course , in my health class regarding sex ed there was no sexual act instructions what so ever. It was all basic body functions and biology 101 . Little kids don't need to be instructed on how to have sex like these left wingers are doing now.

I understand you. I would take no issue with the class you describe.

So you're comparing teaching kids that trans and gay people exist to teaching kids about anal and oral sex? You might as well just type out "I hate LGBTQ+" and hit Post Comment

I don't hate anyone, I disapprove of homosexual agendas being taught to children that have not even hit puberty yet. Little kids don't need to learn about transexuals or homosexuals, it is not necessary information for a little kid to have, it reeks of pedophilia, and trying to make it seem innocent exposes it even more as grooming.

Now you're saying that simply teaching kids that Trans and gay people exist is pedophilia? Your phobias are becoming more obvious with each comment!

Left wingers love your little buzz words. Label me what you will, I could not care less what someone that advocates pedo agenda on to little kids thinks of me. The more you defend the trans agenda the more guilty you are every time a kid commits suicide because they were lied to and sexually confused by your kind.

What are you even talking about anymore

Sexual minorities already have high suicide rates, now you have lgbtq cultists telling prepubescent children that they can be different genders when they are not truly trans, causing them to become more confused and more likely to commit suicide. You and people like you , who advocate for this type of brain washing, are putting kids at risk.

Yeah the people telling children that gay and trans people exist are the ones causing the high suicide rate of LGBTQ+ children, not the people bullying them and invalidating their identity. That totally makes sense and isn't the product of people desperately grasping at opportunities to validate their opinion.

Also your source does not even support anything you said, it is strictly about adolescents with aren't heterosexual, there is no mention of their gender; and it only says "Sexual minority adolescents", not "adolescents that know that gay people exist".

I am talking about the skyrocketing suicide rates of kids due to gender confusion, and people like you pushing this garbage onto kids too young to understand the concept of gender identity. For some sick reason you feel the need to recruit younger and younger kids to the alphabet cult . Introduce this left wing garbage to young adults , not little kids. Why can't you understand that it is not appropriate and has long term destructive mental side effects to the kids ?

Respecting others shouldn't be dependent on anything other than the fact that they are people.

You create "isms" when you base respecting others on social devices, or as people of your ilk prefer, "constructs".

Tell us, do you respect caucasian, heterosexual, Christian, affluent, males?

Your answer will include an "if" or "but" statement which will further illustrate my statement that you are advocating discrimination.

I am not hating anyone on fundamental parts of their identity, why are you?

Your answer will include an "if" or "but" statement which will further illustrate my statement that you are advocating discrimination

You lack the ability to even make an original statement.

There is no hatred in my statement(s).

That is you creating a false narrative to deflect attention from the fact you have no real response you can articulate.

Your tactics are common and transparent to all but the most simple minded.

The answer you do not wish to type out is that you do not have respect for people that differ from you in "fundamental parts of their identities", their beliefs, politics, morals, and values.

That is the very same bigotry that you purport to oppose.