About your moderator application, I have a few more questions:

How do you resolve your religious views with objective morality?

If morality is not objective, how could there be anything wrong with furries?

I just don't believe in a god nor objective in life. Furries are low life scum into shit like dressing up as a rainbow dog or drawing r34 of two people dressed as animals having sex. it's downright disgusting and not human, so I have a serious issue with it.

Okay, but logically, why do you have issues with it? After all, in your view, the world is purely physical, and nobody else is harmed.

Also, I'm not sure that you quite got what I meant by objective morality. I meant not about any objective in life, I meant a morality that is the same, no matter the standard of the person judging it. The opposite of that would be subjective morality, which says that morality varies from person to person and that we can't know anything of morality.

Considered that the world is purely physical, there's nothing I want more than to send one of these dogf**kers to the endless abyss using a sledge.

I have issues with it because you cannot pretend to be something you're not, like a dog. How would you find it in you to go on all fours and bark at people. Because of my views doesn't mean I can't see that furries don't make sense, I want nothing to do with them, aside from arguing and helping to deliver commands against them.

Who says you can't pretend to be something you aren't? Objective morality does, and since you can't provide a clear answer to why there's something wrong with furries while still excluding the possibility of God, I cannot give you moderator status.

are you accusing me?

Yes, I am accusing you of being a potential liability.

What was the correct answer to your question though?