Some choose to change the law, others choose to break the law. What do you choose?

I feel like pubs would literally turn this around and not get it. "Oh so when Rosa Parks breaks the law she's a Hero, but when Drump does it he's EVIL!" . . . Yes. Exactly.

"Oh, if I'm elected president, I'll be changing A LOT of laws. And I'll pardon myself and all my henchmen. And I'll dissolve Parliament & appoint my own, just like my hero Vlad. And I'll get rid of term limits, and..."

What term limits? XD

The difference is that Rosa Parks was a political prisoner (meaning that Parks was just jailed for no valid reason besides racism), yet Trump actually deserves to be locked up because if he doesn't get justice then the American justice system would be failing as it can easily fall for Trump's lies

Exactly: Rosa Park's arrest violated the Constitution whereas in Trump's case hé did.

Good point, I found on Google that segregation violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Get a load of this, but I honestly made a gut feeling that I honestly thought (with prejudice but I didn't post it anyways) that segregation "was constitutional". But it never was, which I'm glad I did my google search.

But why did they have segregation in the first place, if it was unconstitutional?

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/separate_but_equal