There Should Be ONE Truth and Not FIFTY Shades of It

That's because that stuff goes in the trial. The indictment just confirms that his case meets the minimum legal threshold.

Legal scholars would disagree 'that his case meets the minimum legal threshold'. Fun fact:
DOJ and Dems' legal loons and FBI are all on the same team.

Injustice
imgflip.com/i/7utl3i

What legal scholars?

Howard, Fine & Howard LLP

Well I'm convinced now!

I got a friend, Dwight D Doogenhauser, whose cousin mops floors at an H&R Block, and they overheard there that someone there said Trump wuz robbed. And framed. Plus one time McD's left out the toy in one of his 2pm Happy Meals. That wasn't nice of them. It's very sad what he goes through, and he's doing it for us. One Happy Meal at a time. *wipes tear*

Mark Levin: This indictment is crap!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykBjAHiGQOU

Dershowitz Predicts SCOTUS Will Overturn Trump’s January 6 Conviction
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/dershowitz-predicts-scotus-will-overturn-trump-s-january-6-conviction/ss-AA1eRJR9

Gregg Jarrett is the third one off the top of my head but you are capable of doing your own research. Unfortunately, CNN doesn't cover the real news or you would know about them and others, Modda. You should be following Alan Dershowitz as he is a Democrat but a FAIR Democrat as he interprets the LAW and doesn't rely just on his 'feelings' like the ladies on The View. Glad they are on your side as they are nothing short of EMBARRASSING! 😂

Someone SCREAMED a rant on Fox News for 8 minutes,

Some discredited outcast loon on Trump's legal team,

and another Fox nutter.

No, I won't do your homework for you and look for others other than the only 3 you could find.
Perhaps you shouldn't watch so much CNN and maybe you can switch your party affiliation from Democrat to something else (and I don't mean Repugnican) and stop getting so wrapped in eveything on The View? Hasselbeck left, ya know.

Were your legal scholars on the Grand Jury? because that's who needed to make that decision.

Wow, really, two different law enforcement agencies are on the same side of a criminal case? What a mystery.

Can hardly wait for the fair and unbiased TDS-afflicted jury of his peers...

Sounds like you know full well he's guilty and you're making your excuses now 🤷‍♀️

Absolutely not. I know he is NOT guilty. I am fearful of the combined IQ of the compromised 'peer group' not exceeding room temperature.

You know the exact reason they choose twelve of them is to make that reaaaaaaaaally unlikely?

It's more likely that you're just trying to get ahead of the excuse-making you'll need.